home

1st Cir. Rules Against DOJ on Halfway House Restrictions

In December, 2002, the Bureau of Prisons changed its policy and began refusing to let inmates go to halfway houses until they completed 90% of their sentences. Today, the first federal appellate court to issue a decision on the policy, struck it down. Via e-mail from defense attorney Todd Bussert of New Haven, Conn:

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit published the first appellate decision on the merits concerning the BOP halfway house litigation that has been ongoing since January 2003. In Goldings v. Winn, the Court of Appeals roundly rejected the government's statutory interpretation, finding that 18 USC 3621 vests BOP with the authority to use halfway houses, which are properly viewed as "places of imprisonment" under that provision, at any point in a prisoner's sentence that it deems appropriate.

From the opinion:

The policy change that is the subject of this lawsuit was required by a December 13, 2002 Memorandum Opinion from the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel, which declared unlawful the BOP's prior practice of placing federal prisoners in community confinement to serve all or part of their sentences. Goldings argues that the BOP's policy is based on an erroneous interpretation of two statutory provisions of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § § 3621(b) and 3624©. According to this interpretation, these two provisions limit the BOP's discretion to place prisoners in CCCs to the lesser of the last six months or ten percent of their terms of imprisonment. Although the change in policy has generated a flood of lawsuits in the federal district courts, no court of appeals has yet spoken on the validity of the BOP's new policy. We do so here and conclude that the new policy is contrary to the plain meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b).

Congrats to appellate whiz and frequent TL commenter Peter Goldberger of Ardmore, PA and to Todd Bussert who co-wrote one of the amici briefs. Peter and Todd previously were successful in getting a New York district court to invalidate the policy.

< California Joins Suit Against Diebold | Pregnant Drug User Charged With First Degree Murder >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort: