home

Mike Johnson Re-elected House Speaker (By a Hair)

By a vote of 218 to 215, Republican Mike Johnson beat Democrat Hakim Jeffries for House Speaker. There was some drama as it took a phone call from Donald Trump to get two Republicans to change their vote. (One person voted "other").

I tuned in to hear the end of Jeffries' speech on You Tube.

He gave a flattering welcome to Johnson. Johnson then spoke and was gracious back to Jeffries. . Here's how Johnson described their agenda: [More...]

The American people want an America First policy.
We will start by containing our nation’s borders. We’ll deport illegal aliens and criminal aliens and finish building the border wall.
We will extend the Trump tax cuts (gets the largest applause)
He emphasizes our duty to restore American energy dominance, stressing the word dominance.
We will pass legislation to eliminate the green new deal. We will end the ridiculous EV mandates.
We will roll back the totalitarian fourth branch of government known as the administrative state ( I have no idea what that means.) < br /> We will make sure parents have the right to choose their child's education.
We will create a lean and faster more efficient federal work force.
He then attacks Democrats claiming "They tried to replace our military with social justice warriors. We have to put an end to this madness."... It is time to reinstate fear in our enemies.
He recites a religious prayer he claims was given or written by Thomas Jefferson that ends with the words "Jesus Christ Our Savior".

Shorter version: The military-industrial complex reigns supreme.

****

Update: See comments to this post below: The prayer likely wasn't written or recited by Thomas Jefferson once, let alone every day of his presidency for years, as Johnson claimed. According to the Monticello Organization, which is a repository of Jefferson's works and words, most likely it is from a 1919 revised version of the "Book of Common Prayer". Also see the linked sources at the bottom of this post.

(Disclaimer: My only knowledge of a "Book of Common Prayer" is the 1977 novel by Joan Didion, referred to in Wikipedia. (I had no idea <"http://www.talkleft.com/bookofcommonprayer_350.jpg">my hard cover version of the novel is a First Edition. It is such pristine condition I'm not sure I ever finished reading it, even though Joan Didion is my favorite author.) In any event, the point is that Joan Didion's novel is hardly an uplifting work or anything like a prayer. It takes place in an fictionalized country in Central America she calls Boca Grande and is about a woman named Charlotte Douglas. From Wikipedia:

Charlotte's beloved daughter Marin has run off with a group of Marxist radicals and taken part in an absurd act of terrorism, and in the wake of her daughter's disappearance, Charlotte's marriage to a crusading Berkeley lawyer (not Marin's father), has fallen apart.

Or, as Joyce Carol Oates described it in a book review she wrote for the New York Times:

Marin, Charlotte's 8‐year‐old daughter, was seen with several other young people detonating a crude pipe bomb in a San Francisco office building and later hijacking a plane to Utah, where they burned it in time for the incident to interrupt the network news. Now a fugitive, she participates in revolutionary activity, mainly by making tape recordings in which she speaks of “expropriation” and “firepower” and the need to destroy imperialist symbols. “The fact that our organization is revolutionary in character,” Marin says with solemn, mindless circularity, “is due above all to the fact that all our activity is defined as revolutionary.”

The use of the word "imperial" strikes a new chord. Isn't that how Donald Trump how envisions himself, with his offer to purchase Greenland from Denmark and take back the Panama Canal? It's a good thing Mike Johnson has such a pious backbone. He will need it to survive as speaker of a House where Trump believes he gets to call the shots, set the agenda and fire the person in charge should he fail to bring home the bacon. Last word: I wonder if it turns out Johnson made a fool of himself by referencing Jefferson as the author of the prayer he recited, whether he wrote the speech or a speech-writer wrote it for him. If it's the latter, will he fire the speech-writer? He should. If he can't correctly fact-check his own speeches, how badly will he butcher other facts -- ones that matter --- during his tenure as Speaker?

Does anyone want to venture an opinion about how he came up with Thomas Jefferson for the prayer, and whether he was right or wrong?

< Utopias: A Successful Investment Plan for Cities' Poorest Hoods
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Fake prayer (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by hardindr01 on Fri Jan 03, 2025 at 04:27:11 PM EST
    Thomas Jefferson never said the prayer Speaker Johnson ascribed to him.  Please see here for more information

    here is the link (5.00 / 2) (#5)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Jan 03, 2025 at 06:48:23 PM EST
    from Monticello.org saying it's "spurious" that Jefferson used it, let alone created it.


    Parent
    Thomas Jefferson (5.00 / 2) (#8)
    by Zorba on Sun Jan 05, 2025 at 02:59:05 PM EST
    Was not a Christian Trinitarian in any way, shape, or form.
    And obviously Johnson and his people didn't even research this at all.

    Parent
    I think they just like (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by jondee on Sun Jan 05, 2025 at 05:04:55 PM EST
    the part about him having slaves. Before those 'woke' abolitionists came along.

    Parent
    It's OK to lie if its for... (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by desertswine on Mon Jan 06, 2025 at 12:33:10 AM EST
    Jebus or the Fat Melon Boy.  If fact, the bigger the lie the better. Let the official re-writing of History continue.

    Parent
    Correction (none / 0) (#2)
    by hardindr01 on Fri Jan 03, 2025 at 04:27:52 PM EST
    Not sure why the html link did not work: https:/www.monticello.org/research-education/thomas-jefferson-encyclopedia/national-prayer-peace-sp urious-quotation

    Parent
    HUH? (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by jmacWA on Sat Jan 04, 2025 at 05:23:45 AM EST
    He gave a flattering welcome to Johnson.

    Will Democrats ever learn that being nice to these people is a waste of time.  I did not see anything on this speech, so I guess it's possible it was given tongue in cheek knowing it would get him nowhere.  I want to see Democrats stand up and call out Republicans every time they speak.  The election of this crackpot at speaker does not call for flattery.

    After finding a transcript I can see that it reads like he was civil more than flattering, but I would still like to see more combativeness from the Democrats in congress.

    What (5.00 / 2) (#7)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Jan 04, 2025 at 11:52:54 AM EST
    a dark vision Johnson has for America. Not uplifting in the least but also what I expected from an apostle of the Dark Renaissance.

    Today is the day that Congress will (5.00 / 4) (#12)
    by Peter G on Mon Jan 06, 2025 at 11:06:51 AM EST
    unconstitutionally certify Tr*mp as the winner of the 2024 election for President, effective January 20, 2025. I say "unconstitutionally" because paragraph 3 of the 14th Amendment plainly states that Tr*mp is disqualified from assuming the presidency, on the basis that four years ago today he "engaged in insurrection" against the Constitution of the United States. In Trump v. Anderson (3/4/24) the Supreme Court (mistakenly, imho, albeit unanimously) held that Congress, not the States, is responsible for enforcing Paragraph 3. But assuming that is so, it is therefore the duty of Congress today to refuse to certify the election of someone who does not have the minimum requirements for the office, just as they would if somehow a majority of the Electoral College had voted for someone who is not yet 35 years old, or who was not born in the United States. I wonder whether any members of Congress will object on this basis?

    If the rest of the world is embracing EVs, (none / 0) (#3)
    by Chuck0 on Fri Jan 03, 2025 at 04:53:41 PM EST
    how does the US restore energy dominance if no one wants the GD oil any more?


    To me "dominance" (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by jondee on Fri Jan 03, 2025 at 04:58:36 PM EST
    for these f*ckers is just code for: "provide us with what we need or prepare to go to war."

    Parent
    Let's not forget (none / 0) (#11)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jan 06, 2025 at 08:27:06 AM EST
    he might be speaker but he has a 1 (one!) vote majority.

    Until next year.