home

Spy Eyes

by TChris

The fear of Big Brother watching our every move has often defeated government plans to install surveillance cameras. Creeping into the public consciousness, however, is the reality that government usually obtains access to the private cameras that have become ubiquitous in urban areas.

According to the New York Civil Liberties Union, which tracked cameras from 1998 to 2004, publicly visible cameras in Chelsea have gone to 368 from 67; in Times Square, to 258 from 98; and on the Lower East Side, to 125 from 21.

Often the private camera in a building, store or restaurant might as well belong to the government, since private entities usually turn their videos over to police investigators after a crime.

The evidence provided by a clear picture is usually more reliable than eyewitness testimony, and can forestall accusations against innocent bystanders. Still, the realization that government has such easy access to cameras that chronicle the daily lives of many is unsettling.

What would be lawful taping by individuals would not be lawful by the government, but the government can get access to private videotapes that they would not be able to have taken themselves without a warrant," said Donna Lieberman, head of the city's Civil Liberties Union. "The distinction between private and government surveillance blurs."

< Springsteen on CBS Sunday Morning | Texas House to Debate Life Without Parole Option >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Re: Spy Eyes (none / 0) (#1)
    by kdog on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:17 PM EST
    Unfortunately, people don't care, because they are cowards that fear true freedom. The police state has arrived.

    Re: Spy Eyes (none / 0) (#2)
    by ppjakajim on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:18 PM EST
    TL - When you have some time, check out that very dangerous, high crime rate area in Littleton... intersection of County Line and Broadway..