home

Thoughts on Kelo and Judicial Activism

From Defense Attorney John Wesley Hall (author of Search and Seizure Textbook, among others):

....the Republicans decry judicial activism at every turn, but, in Kelo v. City of New London (pdf), the "liberal" majority engages in judicial passivity to permit a taking by local government to use private property for a "public purpose" by granting near total deference to the determination of local officials.

The label "judicial activism" always applies to the judges aligned with the other guy. When it's their guys doing it furthering their agenda, "well, that's just the way it goes, citizen, suck it up." When you think about it, the only mouths the words "judicial activism" come out of are from the Right, but with an agenda to threaten judges with impeachment or a constitutional amendment limiting terms. Note that they didn't think of that when Reagan-Bush packed the federal courts with about two-thirds of its active members in that twelve years.

And I sit here, with my divining rod, trying to forecast where the Court is going in the next constitutional case.

In other Kelo news, developers want to seize Justice Souter's home. Law Prof Eric Muller of IsThatLegal has some thoughts on this and a lot of links to other law profs discussing it.

Update: Skippy has a blog roundup of opinion on the case from both sides.

< Don't Fall for the 9/11 Bait and Switch: Focus Should Be on Osama, the Taliban and Insurgency | Arianna Alleges Cheney Hospital Cover Up >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Thoughts on Kelo and Judicial Activism (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:00:42 PM EST
    Replace all churches with Walmart parking lots. Let the people get their divine inspiration on Aisle 31, in the book section. NOW -- Books on Tape are 25% off. That's better than a church will ever be. And you can still get your Starbucks™ coffee, just like you're used to in your church of choice. If Church Jesus was alive, he'd be a real estate lawyer, because this ruling is too good to be true, and that's Church Jesus all the way.

    Re: Thoughts on Kelo and Judicial Activism (none / 0) (#2)
    by Quaker in a Basement on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:00:42 PM EST
    Why are they picking on Souter? Weren't there five justices who voted for this decision?

    Re: Thoughts on Kelo and Judicial Activism (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:00:42 PM EST
    Why not give the state and local goverments the power to overide all the freedoms enumerated in the Fifth Amendment. I think it's great. You want due process, protection from self-incrimination or double jeopardy? Hope you live in a state these freedoms have not been eliminated for "economic reasons". On second thought maybe property rights were reserved for the federal goverment in the Fifth Amendment for a reason.

    Re: Thoughts on Kelo and Judicial Activism (none / 0) (#4)
    by Wile ECoyote on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:00:42 PM EST
    Paul in LA: I heard of Walmart going in over the local Abortion Clinic. They will beat any price.

    Re: Thoughts on Kelo and Judicial Activism (none / 0) (#5)
    by jimcee on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:00:42 PM EST
    I think that the irony of this put-on fits the template very well and I loved the Ayn Rand/Gideon analogy. Excepting that, it is much more difficult to steal a Supreme Court justice's property than it is to steal some smuck's property. If you think that this is a put-on you are correct. If you don't see the irony then you are an elitist idiotarian. Laws are for me, not for thee.... Sheesh, what fools do politics breed.

    Re: Thoughts on Kelo and Judicial Activism (none / 0) (#6)
    by Sailor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:00:42 PM EST
    Sheesh, what fools do politics breed. I would respectfully submit that they bred first and THEN went into politics;-)