home

Is Rove Facing an Obstruction of Justice Charge?

Anonymous Liberal lays out a case for charging Karl Rove with obstruction of justice (second paragraph) instead of perjury. Personally, I think a false statement charge under 18 U.S.C. 1001 would be easier to prove, but AL makes a good argument.

Also, if the Government charged and proved a false statement charge, it could get a bump under the guidelines for obstruction of justice, without ever having to charge or convict Rove of the actual crime of obstruction.

In any event, Anonymous Liberal's post is well worth a read.

< Blogging the Dog Days of Summer | Innocent Man Pardoned >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Is Rove Facing an Obstruction of Justice Charg (none / 0) (#1)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:28 PM EST
    Why stop at obstruction. There is perjury, conspiracy, the espionage Act, and the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, and throw in violation of RICO laws as well. John Dean writes about Randal:
    It was an eighteen count "kitchen sink" indictment; they threw everything they could think of at Randel. Most relevant for Karl Rove's situation, Court One of Randel's indictment alleged a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641. This is a law that prohibits theft (or conversion for one's own use) of government records and information for non-governmental purposes. But its broad language covers leaks, and it has now been used to cover just such actions.
    The Robert's INR memo and other documents may have been leaked around. Fitzgerald wants to ask Miller about any documents that her source (Libby) brought to the July 8 meeting; Presumedly he has already asked others about documents. Louis Klaravas writes about the Espionage Act indictments for AIPAC/Franklin case, and its implications for the Fitzgeralds case.
    On the morning of February 12, 2003, Lawrence Franklin, the Iranian desk officer working in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, met with Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman. Both Rosen and Weissman worked at AIPAC - Rosen as the director of foreign policy issues and Weissman as a senior Middle East analyst. The indictment charges against all three men with conspiracy to communicate national defense information to persons not entitled to receive it in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 793(g) - a provision of the Espionage Act that requires that at least one of the co-conspirators acts in a manner to "effect the object of the conspiracy." (The "overt act" requirement is a common feature of conspiracy law, designed to prevent mere conversations from becoming the basis for criminal charges.)


    Re: Is Rove Facing an Obstruction of Justice Charg (none / 0) (#2)
    by Molly Bloom on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:28 PM EST
    Former Federal Prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega seems to think an indictment under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act is under rated as a possiblity See Tom Dispatch

    instead of
    < ?