home

McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Seventh Trip to Gulf

by Last Night in Little Rock

TChris noted yesterday the White House's conservation message. In an incredible piece of irony, Presidential Press Secretary Scott McClellan urged Americans to save fuel by eliminating unnecessary trips during the President's seventh day trip to the Gulf Coast for a photo op as noted in today's NY Times. He noted that the Presidential motorcade had fewer vehicles in it, all for a trip of a few hundred feet to meet with local officials. That was an example of the White House conserving.

Mr. McClellan made his comments aboard Air Force One on Mr. Bush's seventh trip to the hurricane region. The Air Force has estimated that it costs $40,000 an hour to fly Mr. Bush's 747, according to the book "Air Force One," by Kenneth T. Walsh. The bulk of the cost is fuel.

Mr. Bush has spent about 15 hours on his plane in the last seven days.

Mr. McClellan said Tuesday's trip would be Mr. Bush's last to the region this week, although he said it was not necessarily because the president was limiting his travel for conservation reasons.

Two hours down, two hours back, just for a photo op to feign concern for the people who were harmed by the storm.

Remember the first trip: The President was in awe, and the best he could come up with was that he would see to it that Trent Lott's beach house lost in the storm will be better than before, as noted here.

"Do as I say, not what I do." And so it goes...

< Carnival Cruise Lines Cashes in with FEMA | Limbaugh's Doctors To Be Questioned in "Doctor Shopping" Case >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#1)
    by soccerdad on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:24 PM EST
    Bush will be interested in conservation the day his oil company cronies can make a killing off of it

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#2)
    by kdog on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:24 PM EST
    Not for nothing, shouldn't the White House always be urging fuel conservation? Isn't the conservation of fuel in our national best interest? This should have been recommended on 9/12/01. Waste not, want not.

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#3)
    by jen on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:24 PM EST
    The proper response to our nation's dependence on foreign oil (including our military) has never seemed to concern a majority of americans. After all, having a cool big honkin suv is our RIGHT dagnabit. I keep wanting to make little magnets that say "conserve fuel" to put on big honkin suv's sporting the "support our troops" magnets. One run through a parking lot and one would need many many many.

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#4)
    by kdog on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:24 PM EST
    Jen...Speaking of SUV's, one thing I noticed from all the pictures of the gridlock from the hurrican evacuation in Texas was that nearly every vehicle was an SUV or monster pickup truck. Nary a sedan or economy car to be seen. When it comes to nearly every resource, we are a bunch of gluttons.

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#5)
    by desertswine on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:24 PM EST
    That's funny. There's nothing about conservation in the Bush Energy Bill. Just giveaways and tax breaks for big oil companies.

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#6)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:24 PM EST
    America needs to guzzle as much gas as it wants. That is the sign of a successful and powerful nation. F*ck the rest of the world, Americans deserve the lifestyle they have even if I am getting rich off them.-the chimp king speaks.
    Q Does the President believe that, given the amount of energy Americans consume per capita, how much it exceeds any other citizen in any other country in the world, does the President believe we need to correct our lifestyles to address the energy problem? MR. FLEISCHER: That's a big no. The President believes that it's an American way of life, and that it should be the goal of policy makers to protect the American way of life. The American way of life is a blessed one. And we have a bounty of resources in this country. What we need to do is make certain that we're able to get those resources in an efficient way. . . Q So Americans should go on consuming as much more energy than any other citizens in any other countries of the world, as long as they want? MR. FLEISCHER: Terry, the President believes that the American people are very wise and that, given the right incentives, they will know how and they will make their own right determinations about how much they can conserve . . . But the President also believes that the American people's use of energy is a reflection of the strength of our economy, of the way of life that the American people have come to enjoy. Ari Fleischer Press briefing May 7, 2001
    via billmon

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#7)
    by kdog on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:24 PM EST
    That's hysterical squeaky..nice job. In other words, ignore the energy crisis so my buddies in the oil industry can continue to get obscenely rich. Also, is Fleischer really saying that gluttony is an american way of life? I'm sure that would be news to a lot of Christians. Gluttony is still one of the seven deadly sins right?

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#8)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:24 PM EST
    kdog-gluttony is offset by generosity; it is a way of giving to those that god has selected to be rich. The higher the price of oil the more generous the gluttons are. Bush understands all that and is thankful to be the leader of a great nation of generous glutton/givers. A juicy bit in the press briefing shows how savvy Bush is when it comes to his profit margin. Fleisher says that Bush is urging conservation on "renewables, biomass, wind, solar" but not on the 88% spent on fossil fuels. I guess he is not invested in renewable energy and wants to squeeze those that are out of business:
    MR. FLEISCHER:  There's also a reflection of the fact that 88 percent of America's energy comes from fossil fuels.  The remaining 12 percent come from renewables, biomass, wind, solar.  It's a very small percentage.  And among that 12 percent -- you also have nuclear in that mix.  And so the amount of energy that can come from -- let me put it to you this way. The place that the American people get most of their energy that we are dependent on to preserve the American way of life does come from fossil fuels.  And within the remaining portion of the energy that the American people use, the President is committed to a conservation program to help Americans to conserve more.
    link

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#9)
    by Che's Lounge on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:24 PM EST
    America. F**k Yeah!!!

    During WWII, a common sign, was posted at various places, "Is this trip really necessary?" It aimed at conserving gasoline and other materiel, like rubber tires, of course. I think the (p)resident should be met with that sign every time he sticks his nose outside the White House. "Is this trip really necessary?" Every time! "Is this trip really necessary?" And the presstitutes should ask it of Scott at every press conference concerning a Bush trip. "Is this trip really necessary?" Even just across town. "Is this trip really necessary?" Every. Single. Trip. "Is this trip really necessary?" Ed

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#11)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:25 PM EST
    Does Charley actually read his posts before submitting them?

    Re: McClellen Urges Fuel Conservation, Bush's Sev (none / 0) (#12)
    by aw on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:25 PM EST
    Well, Charley, I'm a liberal and I drive a Subaru Outback wagon. It has everything an suv has without being a monstrosity.

    Hmm, there are kits coming to market which will allow Prius drivers to get up to 250 miles per gallon. Prius' are such a success story, that Ford has ante'd up (far too late) for a piece of that action. It's truly amazing to go out on errands, drive to the store and back, and not burn one gallon of gasoline. I have started seeing two-Prius households, and the people who drive them don't seem to miss anything that they actually needed from a larger, less efficient car. A Prius actually takes some of the energy wasted in braking and turning corners, and stores it to the battery! It also doesn't have to idle to keep running, so drive-through line savings are considerable. It's easy to park, quiet, and rather charming. Charley, you aren't charming. And you aren't a solution. You're just the old inefficient worldview, greedily barking for a bone.

    This stuff is too precious! There has got to be some sort of inverse proportionality law in politics that dictates that you become more like your sworn enemies as your numbers begin to tank. America is on the verge of getting reasy to throw this a#$hole to the wolves and now he's becoming a Greenie. Way too f*&^ing precious! I love it!

    Paulie.... I have started seeing two-Prius households, and the people who drive them don't seem to miss anything. Yeah but nothing compares to my 340HP Hemi! ...Except of course my 385HP GTO with 3 dueces!

    BB, I'm a car nut, so don't try to puff yourself up on your archaic vehicles around me. Vroom Vroom only goes so far when people are dying for the oil supply. I prefer to pay cash for my oil, without innocent families being blown to bloody bits. I'm just sentimental like that.