home

Why a Judge's Values Matter

by TChris

In the context of Harriet Miers’ nomination to the Supreme Court, Edward Lazarus argues that liberals should seize the opportunity to dismantle myths about judging that the right wing has propagated for a couple of decades.

In recent years, conservatives have -- with a fair amount of success -- painted liberals as having defiled the judiciary by overstepping the line between law and politics, and thereby substituting their own policy judgments for the "real" meaning of federal statutes or the Constitution. And Democrats have been far less successful in conveying to the public the view that legal interpretation is inherently politically-influenced -- even despite the fact that any objective study of both liberal and conservative judicial decisionmaking inexorably leads to just such a view.

This is not to say that judges have license to rewrite statutes or to ignore the plain text of the Constitution.

To be sure, conscientious judges recognize a clear distinction between judicial interpretation and imposing personal preferences. Thus, in interpreting the Constitution, they invoke text, structure, history, and precedent as crucial guides.

But by the same token, it is pretense to suggest that judges can somehow compartmentalize - and then ignore -- their own values when choosing among interpretive methods and results.

Statutes are often ambiguous (they result from a political process that depends on ambiguity to attract the votes needed to pass a law), and the “correct” interpretation of a statute typically invokes a contest between competing values. When legislative intent is unclear, judges tend to favor values that are consistent with their own. Interpreting the reach of a law prohibiting employment discrimination, for instance, conservative judges might believe the law was not meant to burden businesses, while liberal judges might believe the law was intended to secure a fair work environment. Both might be true, but the judge’s own values will ultimately govern the law’s application to a particular set of facts.

Interpretations of the Constitution are even more value laden. Good judges try to be true to the document’s core principles, but how those principles translate into modern life -- a life unimagined by the Framers more than two centuries ago -- is often subject to debate. It’s silly to think that a judge’s own values will play no role as the judge analyzes a constitutional question.

Deciding what intrusions on privacy are "reasonable," what governmental purposes are "compelling," what punishments are "cruel and unusual" - to cite but a few examples - requires an exercise of judgment that is inevitably colored by a judge's own values and experience.

Lazarus argues that conservatives, with their rhetoric of “strict construction” and “original intent” and “activist judges,” have disguised their desire to install judges onto the bench who simply share conservative values. He wisely suggests that it is time to inject honesty into the debate about what makes a “good judge”:

In sum, the debate among conservatives over Miers's nomination exposes a longstanding intellectual deceit in their professed allegiance to "strict constructionist" judges. At the same time, it offers an opportunity -- at Miers's hearing -- to treat the public to a candid discussion of how judges actually do their jobs, in place of the mythologized version of judging that emerged during the Roberts hearings.

< Miers: Could She Be Pro-Choice and Evangelical? | Attack Ad Launched Against Earle >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Why a Judge's Values Matter (none / 0) (#1)
    by Dadler on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:58 PM EST
    Human beings created law, human beings interpret law, human beings enforce law. The notion that a human beings' personal "values" do not matter in terms of their position on the United States Supreme Court is, to put it nicely, childishly anti-intellectual. And ask the current Supremes, all of them in their varied legal philosophies and temperments, if they think intellect is important or not in a potential Supreme nominee.

    Re: Why a Judge's Values Matter (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:58 PM EST
    This was an outstanding analysis, TChris, and something I wholeheartedly agree with. I thought Holmes dismantled this lie a long time ago...

    Re: Why a Judge's Values Matter (none / 0) (#3)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:58 PM EST
    Statutes are often ambiguous (they result from a political process that depends on ambiguity to attract the votes needed to pass a law), and the “correct” interpretation of a statute typically invokes a contest between competing values.
    Here's the problem. Republicans like to believe that all laws, deep down, stem from the Bible, which is infallible and, if you're a fundamentalist (i.e. a Republican) to be interpreted "literally" (i.e. in whatever manner aids Republicans.)

    Re: Why a Judge's Values Matter (none / 0) (#4)
    by cpinva on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:58 PM EST
    i don't care, and the constitution doesn't address, what ms. miers' religious beliefs are or aren't. in fact, that shouldn't even be an issue for discussion, certainly not a point in her favor. the issues that matter are her ability to analyze the law, with respect to its constitutional basis, period. the robes are not those of a minister, but a jurist, two entirely different animals.

    Re: Why a Judge's Values Matter (none / 0) (#5)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:58 PM EST
    'Liberals should seize the opportunity.' How come that reminds me of how the Bushies feel about Louisiana? "It’s silly to think that a judge’s own values will play no role as the judge analyzes a constitutional question." It's silly to think that a judge who has already pledged her undying loyalty to the should-be Defendant-in-Chief will put aside loyalty to serve the Constitution. "There isn't a judge on this earth who can judge a Christian like me." --A. Hitler, pentacostal preacher ANYTHING can be justified on the basis of religion. Absolutely stinking everything has already been justified on the basis of religion. Blinding them with lie-ance. Hip-hip for the Enlightenment. Let the self-proclaimed 'religious' work out their Apocalypse without the aid of our system of laws. Justice Crony is already sitting in too many seats.

    Re: Why a Judge's Values Matter (none / 0) (#6)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:59 PM EST
    PIL!! Look out! She's got a cross!!!

    Re: Why a Judge's Values Matter (none / 0) (#7)
    by Peter G on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:59 PM EST
    Well, actually, the Constitution does have something to say about this subject: "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." Article VI, para. 3, clause 2. Not even in the Bill of Rights, but in the original Constitution, the foundation of religious neutrality and of the separation of church and state. Not that our President, constitutional scholar that he is, would ever suggest that a nominee's religious affiliation or faith was an important "test" of her "qualifications" for high "office."

    Re: Why a Judge's Values Matter (none / 0) (#8)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:59 PM EST
    If Bush hauled the cross of going to the wars he supports, hauled the cross of watching soldiers die in his arms, hauled the cross of seeing the villages burning and the small children running on fire, then he MIGHT be something like a follower of Jesus. Instead, he's another LIAR BIBLE-THUMPER who has sold his soul to greed.
    Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal...For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also....No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon (Matthew 6:19-24)
    It's funny that greedy racists can't tell enough about that REAL gospel to save themselves, Jim. And she thinks this false prophet is BRILLIANT! A-ha-ha-ha-ha. What a sold-out ninny.