home

Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times

by Last Night in Little Rock

Tomorrow's NY Times has a significant article online tonight about the scapegoating of Hurricane Katrina: In Newly Released Documents, a View of the Storm After Katrina. It started as soon as the water leveled out in NOLA, and Bushinistas were already finding ways to blame everybody but themselves for the lack of preparation. No plan, except plan to shift blame. Worked with everything else to be thrown at Bush for the last five years, so why not then?

The gamesmanship and political posturing were, in a word, amazing. The greatest natural disaster in the history of the United States, maybe other than the 1906 San Francisco earthquake (see below), was a political tool or weapon in the hands of those who consider politics bloodsport without rules.

It was Thursday, Sept. 1, three days after Hurricane Katrina had ripped across the Gulf Coast. As New Orleans descended into horror, the top aides to Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco of Louisiana were certain the White House was trying to blame their boss, and they were becoming increasingly furious.

"Bush's numbers are low, and they are getting pummeled by the media for their inept response to Katrina and are actively working to make us the scapegoats," Bob Mann, Ms. Blanco's communications director, wrote in an e-mail message that afternoon, outlining plans by Washington Democrats to help turn the blame back onto President Bush.

With so much criticism being directed toward the governor, the time had come, her aides told her, to rework her performance. She had to figure out a way not only to lead the state through the most costly natural disaster in United States history, but also to emerge on top somehow in the nasty public relations war.

Katrina at least equaled the firestorm after the April 19, 1906 San Francisco earthquake may have killed as many as 4000 as noted here and the death toll was covered up for 90 years for economic and tourism reasons. (As the 100th Anniversary approaches, watch for the Discovery Channel shows. I saw one years ago that was shocking on how the destruction and death toll were covered up. Easy to do without CNN.)

We haven't changed all that much in 100 years; only the names have changed. Somethings are timeless: The lack of morals of politicians remains the same, and they apparently always were, except for the luminaries who got their act together long enough to make us a country, so characters like the Bushinistas can ruin it all.

A democracy squandered. I didn't think it was possible until a little less than four years ago.

And so it goes....

< FBI Runs Fake Candidate For Federal Office | Rove, Luskin, Novak and Fitzgerald >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#1)
    by Lww on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Little Rock, why parade around these leftwing hacks with a byline as something they're not? Maybe objective? I googled Eric Lipton and was connected to every leftist kook website on the planet. If I linked you to some nutbag rightwinger site you'd be unappreciative.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Please, everybody...just ignore the troll.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    The City of S.F. Museum timeline shows how the armed forces responded immediately to the earthquake and many other interesting actions. Another helpful 1906 book A Crack in the Edge of the World for the far reaching implications, including how it jumpstarted the failing Evangelical movement.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#4)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    "We cannot let this get out," Mr. Mann, the communications director, wrote about Mr. Castro's offer
    Babies dying of dehydration by the dozens and these idiots are worried about a PR issue that's a relic of cold war-era politics. Partisan politics aside, this government really doesn't give a damn about its own people. That much was made obvious by the hurricane.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#5)
    by Dusty on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    The only thing that is painfully obvious about what the gov't did or didnt do after Katrina is..its total lack of compassion for human suffering. This was a catastrophy unrivaled in modern history and our current administration gave it lip service and nothing more than it had to.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#6)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Good article on the politics of disaster relief here.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#7)
    by Edger on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Very good article, Ernesto. The final paragrapgh is rather telling: "In Florida in 2004, FEMA paid for more than 300 funerals despite the fact that hurricane-related deaths numbered slightly over 100**. In New Orleans in 2005, where the official death toll was over 1000 persons, dead bodies floated down sidewalks and streets, left to rot wherever they had drifted after the waters began to recede. Rowboat federalism indeed" **emphasis mine

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#8)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:38 PM EST
    Dusty: I gotta ask. How should the three gov'ts (fed, state and local) shown compassion for human suffering? Worn sackcloth and ashes in recognition? Or just gotten on with the job of relief? Would that make you feel better? I flew missions down into Hurricanes Katrina and Rita areas to deliver supplies and just got back from a month in the ME flying supplies into Islamabad for the Earthquake relief. I would judge that the Earthquake easily rivaled the Hurricanes. And I would say the Tsunami tops them all. You may have overloked them.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#9)
    by BigTex on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:39 PM EST
    The irony here is astounding. Has anyone condiered two salient points? First, the magnitude of damage with Katrina compared to other hurricanes? Second, how the victims of Katrina acted in compairson to how the victms of how Rita acted? Both of those are two telling criteria that need to be examined. Having been on the front lines helping Katrina evacuees in a decontamination and supply center in Texas, then having been one of those hit by Rita, the differences are astounding. But in the closed minded quest to bash the administration those factors aren't even considered. Not to say that FEMA acted perfectly, but their actions and the actions of the critics are indistinguishable. Critics care more about making political points rahter than getting to the root of the problem. It equally disgusting.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#10)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:39 PM EST
    Last Night writes:
    Katrina at least equaled the firestorm after the April 19, 1906 San Francisco earthquake may have killed as many as 4000 as noted here and the death toll was covered up for 90 years for economic and tourism reasons.
    First, are you saying that the government is covering uo 4000 deaths? If so, what proof do you have besides an inacurate comparsion to the SF earthquake? I'm LOL.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#11)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:39 PM EST
    getting to the root of the problem.
    Which is what, Tex?

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#12)
    by BigTex on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:39 PM EST
    Several problems: 1) Is FEMA prepared to handle one of the "disaster scenarios?" The disaster scenario's are special disasters that can happen that will result in more damage than run of the mill disasters. Katrina was one. A lahar/pyroclastic flow into Seattle or Portland is another. The "big one" directly under SF or LA. From what it seems, FEMA was simply not capable of dealing with the heightned level of damage and need from the storm in NO. They did okay with Rita. It is difficult to believe that a one month time difference was the reason the two storms response was so markedly different. Also, when comparing to the storms last year, the more likely reason is that FEMA can't handle one of the special disasters. 2) FEMA should be broken into separate components for natural disasters and man made disasters. 3) Communication between state and federal officials in disaster relief needs to be improved. Both storms saw problems, though Rita was much improved. 4) The response of the local government and victims. The two storms areas had completly different mindsets. With Rita, we went out and cleared the roads ourselves so relief could flow in. When problems crept up, local officials did what it took to fix the problem. There was no profanity laced interview whining about problems. Rather either the local officials took care of the problem, or got word to federal officials on what help was needed. The communication wasn't always good, espically after the actual emergency situation had died down. Regardess Rita wasn't feds come do it for us mentality. It was this is the problem, let's solve it mentality. 5) Evacuations needs to be planned better. I do not know if this is a local or federal problem. However, evacuations for both storms had serious problems.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#13)
    by Sailor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:40 PM EST
    hey Tex, one of the biggest recommendations of the 9/11 commission was to make the communication systems work together. 4 years later they still don't. I think you might also look to geography and population density in the ability of folks to respond, evac ... etc. The Gov of texas and mayor of houston also had and have very sharp words for fema's response. As far as folks helping themselves goes, I would suggest that the folks in your area started out with a lot more material items, specifically ones needed for 'helping themselves, (quick e.g. not many urban dwellers have chain saws.) Also, you can't clear roads that are under water, and you didn't have to contend with neighboring areas armed folks stopping you from leaving.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#14)
    by BigTex on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:40 PM EST
    As far as population density, I'm not sure what you are getting at. Raw population, 1.1 million in LA and an unknown amount in MS evacuated. Around 4 million in TX evacuated. Both areas were absloutly abismal. Not sure how pop density figures in since NO is high density, and the areas of TX that evacuated are relitavly low density. It may be, as you suggest, that there is a difference in the two areas based on ability to evacuate. That is a good observation that needs to be looked at further. The criticism of FEMA from Perry and White is interesting to examine. That was dealing mainly with the evacuations, once again which were absloutly horrible. That is an issue that must be addressed. Too bad I have a final the day the Governor is in Beaumont to take testamony from the people who evacuated. As is written testamony is being sent in. Looking at the difference in Houston and Golden Triangle (Orange and Jefferson Counties) officials comments also sheds light on the situation. White has and continues to complain fiercly about FEMA and the housing of Katrina evacuees. Thibdeaux (Orange County Judge) and Griffith (Jefferson County Judge - ironic about how the power seats are different in the two areas) both complained about slowness in the funding, but very little complaints about getting supplies in. There was a little bit of complaining vis a vis supplies in Jefferson County, but then again, they kept the County closed when Orange County opened up the county quickly.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#15)
    by Slado on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:40 PM EST
    The blame of Katrina can be put squarely on 1) Katrina and 2) all levels of government. Anyone who tries to separate "government" into entirely Bush or entirely Local is only showing that they are a "republican" or "democrat" and using this as a talking point to push there biases. Katrina was a large storm that hit a city that has and will continue to be underwater. Who's fault is that? The leves were not properly constructed through out and out fraud or stupidity. Who's fault is that? 100,000 people were in the city when it hit. Who's fault is that? Most roads and bridges were impassable so releif aid could not be brought in immediately and there was no or little aid available for those left behind. Who's fault is that? The city is predominately poor and corrupt. Who's fault is that? FEMA has turned into a huge buracracy that couldn't react with speed because all local levels of communication and planning broke down? Who's fault is that? My point is you can't blame one segmant of gov't individualy. NO is underwater. Local gov't didn't or couldn't handle their responsiblities prior or post hurrican and the federal gov't was not set up to pick up the slack. Simple as that. We can blame the locals we can blame the FEDS but Katrina and the subsequent breaking of the leves made this too big a disasture for the system as it existed to handle. Too much blame to go around to put it on one level of government.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#16)
    by Aaron on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:40 PM EST
    This story is just one more confirmation of what I realized two days after hurricane Katrina hit. The Bush administration immediately saw this as an opportunity to damage the Democrats in Louisiana. No doubt Karl Rove and others were whispering in George Bush's ear, "just wait, this is going to turn into a disaster for the Democratic Party, just sit back and wait and we'll move in and pick up the pieces after they fumble the ball." And of course it backfired on them big-time. But I guess when you decide to spend lives in order to gain political capital, you deserve what you get. The whole Bush administration are traitors to the the people of United States of America and I hope to see them dragging chains up the steps of the US Capitol and burned at the stake.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#17)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:40 PM EST
    While I agree there was a bipartisan failure of government, I also believe the real issue is the last 25 years of rightwing anti-government philosophy. The "sink or swim" social policies that have been trumpeted by such visionaries as Ronald Reagan, Newt Gingrich and other paragons of the Republican Party have made a disaster like Katrina inevitable. And the adherents of that philosophy really don't mind what happened, because the old, infirm, and poor people that drowned or died of dehydration are, in their eyes, just a drag on the economy and are better off dead. Some of these same people call themselves Christian, too. And while they don't believe in evolution, the idea of survival of the fittest is a big part of their economic policy. If their policies continue, in a few decades the United States will look like a third world country. New Orelans is just a preview of the future.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#18)
    by Slado on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:40 PM EST
    Ernesto The flip side of your "blame republican" argument is the "blame democrats" argument. Starting with Lyndon Johnson democrats (who controled congress for 40 years) started a policy which rewarded the poor in our country for not producing. Have a child, money. Stay unemployed, money. Etc..., Etc... The government has taught a whole segment of our population that they need not work or prosper because the federal government will be right there to give them money. Such utter dependency on the government finally came home to roost with Katrina because when the government was no longer there to protect them they had nothing to help them protect themselves. This argument is just as ridiculous as yours.

    Re: Scapegoating Katrina: Sunday's NY Times (none / 0) (#19)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:48 PM EST
    Slado, what the conservatives teach us is that you can work your ass off and still be poor. Most of the poor people in New Orleans had jobs. Many proably had more than one job. And they still couldn't afford to get out of the way of a hurricane. And what's the Bush answer? Create more poverty. Welcome to Costa Rica, buddy.