home

Morales Will Not Die Tonight

by TChris

The execution of Michael Morales has been indefinitely postponed. As TalkLeft noted here, a judge insisted that an anesthesiologist attend the execution to assure that Morales was not subjected to extreme pain when three drugs were administered to end his life. As reported earlier today, the anesthesiologists concluded that it would be unethical to assist California's goal of taking Morales' life against his will. Authorities postponed the execution to this evening, hoping to kill Morales with a lethal dose of a sedative, but the judge required the sedative to be administered by a medical professional, and the state acknowledged that it could not comply with that order.

Because the death warrant expires at midnight, authorites will need to obtain a new one from the trial judge. The judge, however, "joined Morales this month in asking Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for clemency." Even if the judge is willing to sign a new death warrant, it will likely take months to resolve the legal challenges to executing Morales by lethal injection.

< Nearly 100 Detainees Died in U.S. Custody | Technical Correction >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Morales Will Not Die Tonight (none / 0) (#1)
    by phat on Tue Feb 21, 2006 at 11:21:05 PM EST
    This really seems to have changed the dynamic surrounding lethal injection. I have to say I'm a little taken aback by it. I was expecting the usual, slow appeals process followed by legislatures modifying their execution methods as is usually how this has worked, historically. I don't understand the appeals process well here and I'm curious if any of this will likely be up for review en banc? It seems not. This whole circus seems quite strange to me. (pardon me if that's not the correct term, I'm still learning the ins and outs of federal appeals process) phat

    Re: Morales Will Not Die Tonight (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Tue Feb 21, 2006 at 11:35:54 PM EST
    The role of the doctors is theatrical, not humanitarian. Perhaps they understand this. Painless execution is easy, just not pretty: The most completely painless way To execute a man Was practiced long before the day It got its name and its cachet From Dr. Guillotin. Our needle brings a worse demise, So anyone who delves Into its use will realize The ones we would anaesthetize Must be ourselves. nightquill.blogspot.com

    Re: Morales Will Not Die Tonight (none / 0) (#3)
    by mpower1952 on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 05:54:39 AM EST
    I don't believe in the death penalty. There's too much chance for mistakes or injustice to take place. Even if there is no doubt and the crime is horrendous and involves a child I think the toll it takes on the victims' families is unconscionable.

    Re: Morales Will Not Die Tonight (none / 0) (#5)
    by jondee on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 02:47:30 PM EST
    Not "his side"; the side whats best and good about humanity. Youre just a very angry man waiting for an excuse to be lowered to Morales level. What would you do without people like that; you need them - otherwise you'd probobly be commiting daily acts of road rage or working for Blackwater.

    Re: Morales Will Not Die Tonight (none / 0) (#6)
    by Johnny on Wed Feb 22, 2006 at 03:04:39 PM EST
    Narius makes the typical wrong-winger assumption that liberals are on the side of the criminal. In the process, he leaves no doubt as to his bloodthirsty side. He does go one step beyond what most wrong-wingers go. He does agree that DNA evidence must be used. Good for him. However, with people like him running around, the chances of recidivism (which is way lower in sexual related crimes than almsot any other BTW) quite possibly skyrockets. If all a guy had to look forward to after prison was working for a man (or woman) like Narius, it is no wonder some want to go back.