home

WSJ Fails to Credit Online Reporter Who Broke Story

The Wall Street Journal today published article by Brody Mullins on Michael Scanlon and his former fiance Emily Miller. It fails to credit investigative journalist Jason Leopold who broke the story in January.

I did a Lexis search and found that Jason's article was the first to report the Scanlon-Miller story. Jason is understandably miffed. He writes by e-mail:

Three months ago, I broke a big story in the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal. I reported that Abramoff's ex-partner Michael Scanlon was implicated in the scandal by his jilted lover and former fiancee, Emily Miller, who met Scanlon when the two worked as press aides for Congressman Tom DeLay. I spent four months fleshing out this story. I spoke to a dozen people in Washington who told me how this went down. In the end, I discovered that Miller spoke to the FBI after Scanlon broke off their engagement and started dating another woman. It was an important story. It had all the makings of a Hollywood thriller. My story was published on the Internet magazine, Raw Story. It received some play on the Net and in indpendent media circles. Some mainstream publication reporters acknowledged the good work in private emails to my editor, John Byrne. However, it was never picked up or republished by any of the traditional publications.

Today, the Wall Street Journal published a front-page "exclusive" that basically recycled my story from January without mentioning that it was first reported by me or that I broke the story wide open. I spoke to two Journal editors in New York. They acknowledged this morning that they read my story and assigned a reporter to follow it up. But they refuse to credit me for first reporting it.

I work tirelessly on reports like this. Often times my reports are not taken seriously by the very people who are supposed to champion the independent media because my work does not appear in so-called reputable publications such as the Journal. The Valerie Plame leak is a perfect example. This isn't a case of sour grapes. It's about giving credit where credit is due. Even if the Journal printed something as benign as "this story was first reported by a website" would have been sufficient.

I spent more than 10 years working for the mainstream media. Ironically, I spent two years as the bureau chief of the Journal's sister outfit, Dow Jones Newswires. I know what goes on behind the scenes and I know what the reporters think of the independent media. We're crap. Hopefully, this will give some pause to