New Yorker Arrested For Broadcasting Hezbollah TV
by TChris
Free speech doesn't extend to Hezbollah -- or to those who help Hezbollah speak. That's the lesson learned by a New Yorker who provides satellite broadcasts to customers. The broadcasts include Christian evangelists and, until recently, the Hezbollah station Al Manar.
Javed Iqbal's home and storefront were raided by federal agents, and now he's behind bars, held on a ridiculously high bail -- $250,000 -- for allegedly providing "material support for terrorism." Does "supporting terrorism" include rebroadcasting programming that's available in much of the rest of the world?
"It appears that the statute under which Mr. Iqbal is being prosecuted includes a First Amendment exemption that prevents the government from punishing people for importing news communications," Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement. "Such an exemption is constitutionally necessary, and the fact that the government is proceeding with the prosecution in spite of it raises serious questions about how free our marketplace of idea is."
The Justice Department apparently believes that Americans aren't capable of evaluating the broadcasts and deciding for ourselves whether they merit our attention. Even if much of the programming is offensive propaganda, do we want the government telling us what we can watch? The president claims to be spreading freedom throughout the world. Do we want to be a country that controls the ideas to which its citizens can be exposed?
"It's like the government of Iran saying we're going to ban The New York Times because we think of it as a terrorist outfit," the spokesman, Farhan Memon, said before the hearing. "Or China trying to ban CNN."
| < MD's Gov. Erlich: Bold Use of Pardon Power | Katrina Timeline: Don't Be Fooled > |
