home

David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom"

(Guest Post by Big Tent Democrat)

David Broder is angry. Not at the President of course. Not at Republicans. But at those nasty foul mouthed bloggers":

Now, however, you can see the independence party forming -- on both sides of the aisle. They are mobilizing to resist not only Bush but also the extremist elements in American society -- the vituperative, foul-mouthed bloggers on the left and the doctrinaire religious extremists on the right who would convert their faith into a whipping post for their opponents.

You see, Broder has taken a whipping the past week for his inanities and yearns for the return of the rightful respect that he, as Dean of the Washington Press Corps richly deserves.

But his prescription is pitiful, even for him. He says he wants "[a] congressional election with lots of new faces and a scare for many returning veterans" but who does he favor? Why the Republicans who have given us this mess of course. The man has truly lost his mind. He can't even maintain his logic through the course of one column. On the other side I'll show you how if you look at just one Broder column from a month ago, that Broder is absolutely lacking in sense. But make no mistake, this is about Broder getting called on his nonsense by bloggers and not getting his Deanful respect. He yearns for the return of the the unchallenged Beltway. But those days, like Tara, are gone with the wind. The country has declared its independence from the wisdom of the Beltway. That means you too Broder.

Who are the "new faces" Broder favors?

The center is beginning to fight back. Michael Bloomberg, the Republican mayor of New York, is holding a fundraiser for Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat running as an independent [read Republican] against the bloggers' favorite, Ned Lamont. His election is important, as is Republican Sen. Lincoln Chafee's in Rhode Island, because both would signal that independence is a virtue to be rewarded. Similarly important, though less publicized, is Republican Sen. Mike DeWine's race in Ohio. DeWine is an ally of McCain & Co. in forming a center for the Senate; his opponent, Democratic Rep. Sherrod Brown, is a loud advocate of protectionist policies that offer a false hope of solving our trade and job problems.

Ahhh. McCain. The love affair is renewed. Cohen and Broder and all the Beltway here they come to worship at the feet of Saint John. Hey Rudy, you don't stand a chance. The Maverick has them locked up.

And that in turn would set the stage for a 2008 election in which the two branches of the independence movement -- Republican and Democratic -- could compete in a campaign that would, for a change, show a "decent respect" for the intelligence of the American people

Sorry Broder, no respect for you. Nobody cares what you say anymore. Your foolish inanities are too vivid and too revealed now.

For example, you want McCain and Lieberman and DeWine to run the country do you? Then retract this columnl:

But once the hope for victory is gone, the issue remains: What do you do? The answer from Bush and from Olmert is: Carry on. Do not waver. And do not question the logic of prolonging the agony.

History suggests that is not always the right answer. The United States has failed to achieve victory in two of its recent wars -- with very different results.

. . .The point is that history and economics have their own logic. A military mission that fails to yield a victory does not always presage disaster. Today, virtually no one argues that we should have continued fighting the North Koreans or the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese.

Can we think about the costs of carrying on, without an end in sight, against Hezbollah and the insurgents in Iraq?

Your favorite "independents" were the main cheerleaders of the Iraq Debacle Broder. They continue to be. Joe Lieberman insists Bush has a "good plan" for Iraq. John McCain wants to send in more troops that we don't have.

You silly old man, you have no idea what you are writing about and frankly, it becomes apparent you never did. Can you even keep two thoughts in your head together anymore? It is obvious that you wrote this column out of personal pique at the rough treatment you received from bloggers. Cloak it in your Beltway BS as you like but we know. Like Bush, Broder has been exposed. And like Bush, there is nothing there, but pettiness and insecurity. Independence? You loathe independence. This is what you tempter tantrum is all about.

Oh by the way Broder, it may interest you to know that you are not the only person from the Midwest, why King Kos himself is from Chicago, the City of the Big Shoulders. Or did you decide Chicago is not the Midwest anymore?

< Bill Clinton Argues Against Torturing Terror Suspects | Dog the Bounty Hunter Special: All-Time High Rating >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Sep 21, 2006 at 10:50:42 AM EST
    Let me get this straight: Broder wouldn't support Gore or Kerry because they were know-it-alls (i.e. intelligent), instead supported a known idiot, and NOW is saying that he hopes the parties will run candidates who respect the intelligence of the American voters? The intelligence of Voters like him, who won't support a candidate because he doesn't like people who are too smart? So is he just figuring out that having morons in the highest public offices isn't really a good idea? Or is he saying that we have idiots running the country because they didn't respect the intelligence of the voters? The point he completely misses, because he doesn't want to face the truth, is that Rove has won elections by continually playing, not to the intelligence of voters and pundits, but to their ignorance and biases. In the new Funk and Wagnalls, next to the word "ass" is a photo of Broder.

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#4)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Sep 21, 2006 at 12:22:56 PM EST
    Yeah, that column has so many things wrong with it. I focused on how he put himself and his mod Rep friends in the middle, aligned with the majority of Americans against the two extreme ends of foul-mouthed bloggers and religious nuts. And what are those middle issues his mod Rep friends (but not lefty bloggers and Nancy Pelosi, apparently) support?
    Americans are saying no to excess greenhouse gases and no to open borders; yes to embryonic stem cell research, yes to a path to earned citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants and yes to a living wage.
    All those things are what mainstream liberals, Dems and particularly foul-mouthed bloggers have supported for years! The very people he supports have had their opportunities to make their moderate independent difference, and they have failed dismally because the radical Reps are in control. Broder is calling for status quo, not some soft revolution. But it's the same stance he took about the filibuster "nuclear option:" Dems surrender!

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#6)
    by Swan on Thu Sep 21, 2006 at 01:34:28 PM EST
    Check this blog post out Wouldn't that be weird if one of those agencies was like 100% ideological Republicans, but made itself look like a bunch of swank hippies in front of the media.

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#7)
    by Che's Lounge on Thu Sep 21, 2006 at 01:34:59 PM EST
    They all still reek of Bush and Cheney. You can't wash it off, no matter how much "Moderate Soap" you use. If the leftie bloggers are so inconsequential, then why get so upset over a few comments from them? Me thinks...

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#2)
    by Jim Strain on Thu Sep 21, 2006 at 03:13:34 PM EST
    I was all set to leave some foul-mouthed (foul-keyboarded?) vituperation, but then I remembered you won't let me. . . . jim strain in san diego.

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#3)
    by JSN on Thu Sep 21, 2006 at 03:13:34 PM EST
    Dick(no, not that one) Are we aupposed to rush to the bookstore and check out the new F&W dictionary? "Ass" and Broder seem to far apart in the alphabet to be on the same page.

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#5)
    by michael on Thu Sep 21, 2006 at 03:13:34 PM EST
    Maybe Broder could do us all a favor and retire. Once a journalist fails to accept criticism as part of job description, it may time to take up stamp collecting. I hear they may be issuing some new ones honoring 50 years of Geneva protections.

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#8)
    by cpinva on Thu Sep 21, 2006 at 03:13:34 PM EST
    broder's been brain dead for years, best to just say kadish over him and be done with it. that he's still a columnist, for anyone, pretty much says it all, as far as the MSM goes.

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#11)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Sep 22, 2006 at 09:31:35 AM EST
    My reading of Broder's piece is that he is supporting politicians who are perceived as different from Bush but will continue the current practice of funding huge military expenditures and ensuring that government is by and for the lobbyists and their corporate beneficiaries. I believe that, as a long-time insider, Broder's antennae sense where the power really resides in the Beltway and he is one that can be counted on to pay homage, perhaps unconsciously, to power. With his esteemed "independent" politicians, e.g., McCain, Lieberman, and Warner, leading the charge, the image of our government may change but the policies will probably not. Bush has only two years left in office and is currently not very popular, so the powers-that-be and their mouthpiece Broder are actively looking for a replacement. Bush is described as "lawless and reckless" which really means that he's dead wood from their perspective. He can't really help them for very much longer and he's become so unpopular that he's jeopardizing Republican control of Congress. Broder senses that the public wants a different direction, and a successful progressive candidacy is a definite and worrisome possibility. So, now we see from Broder's computer initial stones cast at progressives from the "sensible middle" rather than from the far-right Bushies. Hence, a progressive candidate is a "know-it-all" and the progressive base on the Internet are "vituperative and foul-mouthed." The fight will never center around what progressives believe in, because our stand on the issues is popular with the public. Progressives will be fought on matters of form and style and other trivia because that's the opposition's only way to win.

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#9)
    by john horse on Fri Sep 22, 2006 at 10:16:01 AM EST
    McCain, DeWine, and the other politicos that Broder praises for showing "independence" regarding Bush's torture policy have just caved in to Bush and are now going to give Bush essentially what he wants on torture. After he wipes the egg off his face, Broder needs to start opening his eyes and see the way the world is really run.

    Re: David Broder's Beltway "Wisdom" (none / 0) (#10)
    by SeeEmDee on Fri Sep 22, 2006 at 10:16:01 AM EST
    This is the same (ahem) 'gentleman' who decried the use of popular referenda in order to out-manuever established special interests and their crony friends who use the power of their offices to try to blunt or divert the democratic process. He should have his proboscis removed from the Washington political culture's backside before its' making any sharp turns breaks it. Besides, sniffing all that political natural gas can't be healthy; liable to cause cognitive difficulties due to brain damage. Badmouthing direct democracy as he has seems to be a sign of such impairment.