home

Friday Blog Fight: Malkin vs. Muller

Update: Eric Muller posts an apology and acknowledgment that he was mistaken about the photo. I'll just say this. Lawyers, myself included, generally are left-brain. We don't know when a photo is photo-shopped or real-- we don't have the artistic ability to discern between the two. I honestly believe Eric thought the photo was real. He is to be credited for apologizing once its falsity was called to his attention.

UPDATE, 3:00 p.m.: It appears that I was mistaken when I linked to the picture on flickr below, which I believed to be a picture of Michelle Malkin. I regret my error, and I apologize to Michelle Malkin for it. She has asked that I leave the post up -- indeed, she has reprinted it -- and so I will do as she wishes.

**********
It's not even noon and we already have our Friday night blog fight that promises to go all weekend. It's Michelle Malkin vs. Eric Muller of Is that Legal , with a little Wonkette thrown in for good measure..

UNC Law Prof Eric Muller and Wonkette posted a picture he found on a Flickr site allegedly of Michelle Malkin on their websites. Eric wanted to show her hypocrisy for trashing a woman scantily dressed in her latest column.

Only the picture was photo-shopped by someone and is not Michelle. Now, Michelle is filing a complaint with UNC about Eric, saying it's gone too far. And she's asking for help identifying the flickr poster. Allah at Hot Air (another Malkin site) has more on the photo-shopping aspect.

< Military Commission Bill: The Nuts and Bolts | Fla. Rep. Mark Foley Resigns >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Friday Blog Fight: Malkin vs. Muller (none / 0) (#3)
    by Che's Lounge on Fri Sep 29, 2006 at 01:23:19 PM EST
    Muller got petty and got burned.

    Re: Friday Blog Fight: Malkin vs. Muller (none / 0) (#4)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Sep 29, 2006 at 04:19:41 PM EST
    I agree it was a dopey move on Muller's part, ridiculous and beside the point. Though I'm not sure what the point was. In any event it's bad enough to judge people by what they REALLY said and did in high school and college, rather than the stupid things they're saying and doing now.

    What's the UNC?

    Re: Friday Blog Fight: Malkin vs. Muller (none / 0) (#5)
    by Kitt on Fri Sep 29, 2006 at 04:19:41 PM EST
    Sorry, there's real news happening....

    Re: Friday Blog Fight: Malkin vs. Muller (none / 0) (#1)
    by HK on Fri Sep 29, 2006 at 04:19:42 PM EST
    It is a bad photoshop job, with the head far too small. But more amusing than finding someone worse at photoshopping than me is Malkin's attack on Charlotte Church that is the reason for these guys digging out the dodgy photo in the first place. Charlotte Church grew up. Big crime. There are lots of things I didn't do in my early teens that I went on to do. Guess what? People change. If we were all the same people we were when we were 14 years old, the world would be full of moody people with no sense of responsibility who live off fast food and are preoccupied with glimpses of naked flesh. Oh, wait a minute...

    Re: Friday Blog Fight: Malkin vs. Muller (none / 0) (#2)
    by HK on Fri Sep 29, 2006 at 04:19:42 PM EST
    Also amusing is that Charlotte church called GWB a t**t. After all, a person can only sue for slander if something is said about them that isn't true.

    Re: Friday Blog Fight: Malkin vs. Muller (none / 0) (#6)
    by cpinva on Fri Sep 29, 2006 at 08:48:12 PM EST
    so, she was supposedly caught wearing a..............bikini? geez, if i was going to photoshop something, i'd have put her in a teddy or something. last time i checked, a bikini is perfectly appropriate swim wear. i enjoy prof. muller's blog, but clearly he needs to get a better sense of what might actually be considered hypocrisy.

    Re: Friday Blog Fight: Malkin vs. Muller (none / 0) (#7)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Sep 30, 2006 at 05:07:13 AM EST
    cpinva - The issue has a couple of levels. First, the picture is not of her. Secondly, why should a law professor stoop to such pettiness?

    Re: Friday Blog Fight: Malkin vs. Muller (none / 0) (#9)
    by Che's Lounge on Sat Sep 30, 2006 at 02:06:22 PM EST
    So apologies are unacceptable? What goes around comes around Jane.