The Meth Act Does Not Belong in the Patriot Act
The House-passed version of the Patriot Act renewal legislation includes the Meth Act. The New York Times reports:
Under the proposal, Sudafed and similar medicines would have to be under lock and key in stores. Buyers would have to sign a sheet and show a driver's license. Purchases would be limited to one box a day and three boxes a month.
This has nothing to do with terrorism. Poor people and the elderly who don't drive won't have driver's licenses to show. Neither will undocumented residents.
Mike Krause of Colorado's Independence Institute reported:
Scott Burns, Deputy Director of the federal Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) recently contradicted the “epidemic” rhetoric, telling a Congressional sub-committee that America’s estimated 1.5 million methamphetamine users make up only 8% of the country’s estimated 19 million drug users.
Check out the New York Time's John Tierney on the meth myth and Reason's Jacob Sullum here and in Speed Bumps at the Pharmacy. Also, Radly Balko explains why restricting cold pills won't curb meth use.
There is no crisis. Cold pills do not equate to terrorism. Tell your senators to just say no to the meth act.
< Action Alert: Stop the Patriot Act Renewal | Pentagon Tracking "Suspicious" Domestic Groups > |