But in poorly, or hastily, conducted polls you sometimes can get an inkling of data gaps from looking at the crosstabs.

The CNN/ORC poll in Nevada, which had Clinton one point ahead of Sanders, looked like it had very large data gaps.  In fact, they didn't seem to have enough data to release a reliable poll.

Whereas the crosstabs in the Gravis poll released today, which showed Clinton ahead by six points, look spot on.

However, both are pretty small sample sizes.

The trial was a small stepping stone in GSAW, rather than the bulk of the plot in TKAM.

So, GSAW was, essentially, the first draft of TKAM.

I really don't remember a whole lot about it, which it telling.

I do remember that it was, imo, way too much "on the nose."

Many, many, pages of exposition regarding race which read more like a research project or a thesis.

TKAM achieves so much more by "showing, not telling." imo, TAKM was written with the understanding that the reader is already pretty well versed in race.

From a reader's perspective, "To Kill a Mockingbird" likely holds much more timeless and universal appeal, while "Go Set a Watchman" is very much a reflection of the times in which Ms. Lee first conceived and wrote it.

SPOILER ALERT! Don't read any further if you want to experience "Go Set a Watchman" for yourself without any outside influence.

Okay, but don't say you haven't been warned.

The Atticus Finch whom the now-adult Jean Louise Finch -- aka "Scout" -- confronts in "Go Set a Watchman" is quite far removed from the iconic pillar of moral rectitude she once idolized as a child in "To Kill a Mockingbird." Those readers who shared Scout's adoration of Atticus might be distressed and perhaps even offended by the older, somewhat unreconstructed white supremacist introduced to them by Jean Louise:

"Do you want Negroes by the carload in our schools and churches and theaters? Do you want them in our world?"

Atticus' world in "Watchman," Alabama in the 1950s, is a white man's preserve, and his tolerance for the Negro's intrusion upon it would be about the same he might hold for a mosquito buzzing his bedroom at 3:00 a.m. He is clearly a man blinded by his own racial privilege, and Jean Louise -- who had earlier fled Alabama for New York due to her own personal incompatibility with this world -- eventually finds her own tolerance for his alternating latent and not-so-latent bigotry at a low ebb:

"Atticus, I'm throwing it at you and I'm gonna grind it in: you better go warn your younger friends that if they want to preserve Our Way of Life, it begins at home. It doesn't begin with the schools or the churches or anyplace but home. Tell 'em that, and use your blind, immoral, misguided, [racial pejorative]-lovin' daughter as your example. Go in front of me with a bell and say, `Unclean!' Point me out as your mistake. Point me out: Jean Louise Finch, who was exposed to all kinds of guff from the white trash she went to school with, but she might never have gone to school for all the influence it had on her. Everything that was Gospel to her she got at home from her father. You sowed the seeds in me, Atticus, and now it's coming home to you ..."

Further, while Atticus is arguably still a man of personal integrity, humor and patience, he's also maddeningly stubborn. The man refuses to lose an argument, because he simply won't give in. It's a personal trait that likely serves him well as a trial attorney. In the turbulent times of 50s-era Alabama, however, it's bound to cause him a lot of grief as the tide turns in favor of civil libertarians.

He also acknowledges the hypocrisies of the white Southern society in which he lives and works. "Hypocrites have just as much right to live in this world as anybody," he chides Jean Louise when she shows impatience with Henry Clinton, a former childhood friend turned potential beau. Atticus realizes his Jim Crow-era world is collapsing, but that doesn't mean he has to like it, even if his own daughter so happens to approve of the forthcoming changes.

Jean Louise makes clear in "Watchman" that she once idolized her father while she was a child, which of course provides the primary basis for the subsequent "Mockingbird." But this is altogether a very different Atticus Finch from the one we first met during his younger days in "Mockingbird."

Has Atticus really changed in the ensuing 20 years, or was he actually always this way? Maybe Jean Louise was blinded by her father's true character because she stood in obvious awe of him as a child. And perhaps we as readers were suckered in by our own fascination with his archetype in "Mockingbird."

Whatever it is, "Watchman" does eventually compel us to reconsider our own relationship with one of the iconic characters in American literature. Personally, I now see the Atticus Finch of "Mockingbird" as a two-dimensional cardboard cutout of Gregory Peck's upright character arguing on behalf of his client in court, and someone that's hard to imagine ever even using the bathroom.

The Atticus I met in "Watchman" is much more complex and earthy, and suffers from an arthritic condition. He's still a man of honor and integrity, but there's no denying that he's also very much a man of his region and times. While he hardly approves of the brutality being visited upon Negroes by the KKK, he's not at all adverse to attending meetings of the local White Citizens Council and opposing the activities of the NAACP. He can't quite reconcile himself to what's taking place, yet he nevertheless raised his daughter in anticipation of this day so that she would adapt accordingly, even if he could not.

For those who've never read "Mockingbird," I might cautiously urge them to actually read "Watchman" first, if only to see for themselves how Harper Lee's creative process worked in the gradual development of what arguably became one of the definitive novels of the 20th century.

For although "Watchman" shares many of the same characters as "Mockingbird," it's a much different story in terms of literary perspective, yet it is just as fascinating in its own inimitable way.

Bernie Sanders shoe was untied for 3 whole hours at a campaign stop in Greenville.

http://tinyurl.com/hjl3ky4

We can try to answer all of those questions with the help of the gigantic chart you'll see below. On the left-hand side of the chart, you'll find a projection for how each state might go if recent national polls are right, with Clinton ahead of Sanders by about 12 percentage points nationally.

Bush was not a popular president with the right wing.  Under him spending exploded we jumped into every war we possibly could, which the children's of poor republicans disporportionally fight, and he did none of the things he and every republican has promised for decades as far as social issues.   Abortion is legal.  Gays can marry and serve in the military.  And Obamacare thrives.

Far from saying his supporters were wrong, he is saying they were right.   He gets them.  And the (think) they get him.   In addition a huge part of Donalds support is purely and simply a middle finger to the republican establishment.

Trump was in every respect created by the establishment republicans by feeding and riding the paranoid fantasies of their looney base for decades.

To them I say