home

Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee

In an end run around the Fourth Amendment, and putting our civil liberties under siege, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence met in secret today and approved expansions to the Patriot Act that wil allow the Government to obtain records without a court order or grand jury subpoena - and more.

The ACLU sent out this press release earlier today, objecting to both the secret hearing and the expanded powers.

"Americans have a reasonable expectation that their federal government will not gather records about their health, their wealth and the transactions of their daily life without probable cause of a crime and without a court order," Graves added. "We can give law enforcement the tools they need to protect us without sidestepping our Constitution’s fundamental checks and balances."

The bill would give the FBI "administrative subpoena" authority, permitting the bureau to write and approve its own search orders for any tangible thing held by a third party deemed relevant to an intelligence investigation, without prior judicial approval. This unilateral power would let agents seize personal records from medical facilities, libraries, hotels, gun dealers, banks and any other businesses without any specific facts connecting those records to any criminal activity or a foreign agent. This would drastically undermine the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

The proposal would also remove one of the few safeguards in place for intelligence investigations. Currently, business records of an American cannot be demanded "solely upon the basis of activities protected by the first amendment to the Constitution." The proposed legislation would delete this restriction and allow records to be sought based on constitutionally protected activity as long as the investigation as a whole is not based solely on constitutionally protected activity.

Proponents of that power claim that this would give the FBI the same power used by government agencies administering federal programs, like Medicare. But these agencies do not have at their disposal, as does the FBI, other tools like grand jury subpoenas or Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act search orders. The ACLU noted that Congress has continuously denied this power, long sought for by the FBI, for good reasons. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), a member of the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees, expressed concerns that this expanded power would give the FBI "carte blanche" to go on "fishing expeditions" without checks against abuse.

The new powers also allow the FBI to snoop into your mail:

The proposal would also give the FBI broad new powers to track people’s mail in intelligence inquiries. It would force postal workers to disclose the name, address and other information appearing on envelopes delivered to or from people designated by the FBI, without any meaningful protections or oversight. That drastic proposal has drawn criticism from within the service itself, including its chief privacy officer.

This is an abuse of power. The Patriot Act was passed in haste, without adequate time for reflection or review. It has nabbed a few bumbling holy warriors but no real terrorists. It has not made us safer, only less free.

Update: New press release from ACLU:

"Today's secret vote was a failure for the Fourth Amendment, the American people, and the very freedoms we hold dear. At a time when Americans from all walks of life are calling for the Patriot Act to be brought in line with the Constitution, the Senate Intelligence Committee went ahead with an unwarranted expansion of the Patriot Act's already intrusive powers."

< Michael Jackson: No Verdict Yet | Wednesday Open Thread >
  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    "Now is the time for Congress to consider well-thought out modifications to the Patriot Act..." Feinstein wants modicfications? of the Patriot Act? I say outright repeal!

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#2)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:49 PM EST
    Wow, now we create our secret courts in secret legislative sessions. I guess it's only a matter of time until we just scrap the whole voting thing and let the government tell us that it's not an autocracy, we just have secret representatives.

    Scar, we haven't scrapped our Sovereign Franchise. Instead, we outsourced it to entities unmentioned in the Constitution, Corporations.

    Facism: 1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. 2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. 3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. 4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism. 5. Rampant sexism. 8. Religion and ruling elite tied together. 9. Power of corporations protected. 10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated. 11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts. 12. Obsession with crime and punishment. 13. Rampant cronyism and corruption. 14. Fraudulent elections. Make no mistake people, we are there. Hey, the people of Mussolini's Italy didn't consider themselves all of these things either, they just thought of it as business as usual. Do you think the people of Hitler's Germany thought of themselves as genocidal manics? Of course not. Is it no surprise that only a handful of Americans can actually see the writing on the wall?

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#5)
    by pigwiggle on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:49 PM EST
    Well, the Supremes had it right, these folks need more power. Wake up liberals/progressives, the solution isn’t a strong federal government. Concentrated power is too easily misused and abused; and as a minority it is difficult to hold accountable. Decentralized power is responsive and accountable, especially in small states where I have and chose to live. I get the feeling you are going to have your shot in the next few years. What I suspect is the Democrats don’t dislike the new executive/legislative/police powers cultivated by the Republicans, but rather are covetous. Prove me wrong.

    Not being one pw, I can't speak for the Dems. That said, I wouldn't trust anyone with the powers in this act, LW and RW NJ's alike.

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#7)
    by Che's Lounge on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:49 PM EST
    Search first and ask questions later. Just like in the moovies! So it must be OK. MOOOOOOOOO.

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#8)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:49 PM EST
    Hey, defenders of traditional values, quick question. Would Thomas Jefferson approve of this style of governance? Yes or no? Why?

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#9)
    by selise on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:50 PM EST
    the vote was 11-4 !!??!?? does anyone know who voted for and against?

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#10)
    by Johnny on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:50 PM EST
    If you have nothing to hide, why worry? *snicker*

    Everyone should check out this month's Atlantic Monthly ("the coming meltdown")for what is coming once our economy goes south. Fenria is right - all we need now is a decent recession for things to kick into full gear. B

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#12)
    by wg on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:50 PM EST
    Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., said the bill places new checks and balances on the powers it would grant, such as new procedures that would allow people to challenge such administrative orders. I hate to say it but Sen. Roberts is hugely misleading here. His claim of "allowing people to challenge" is not true. You and judiciary can do very little here. FBI controls everything. Read on. --- The FBI needs no judge to secretly demand any records from any body. Once issued the recipient of such administrative subpoena either complies in the time frame dictated by the FBI or goes to court and: - request that the subpoena be set aside (quashed). (this is practically meaningless. In direct violation of fundamental constitutional principles the judge is explicitly forbidden by this statue to investigate whether a probable cause exists. Or even to inquire about it. Subpoenas can be set aside by only if it can be shown that the FBI abused its discretion. There are very few judges in this country brave enough to risk branding the FBI discretion abusers. Plus the FBI always claimed, and most judges long concurred, unlimited discretion.) - request that the subpoena be modified. (this can be granted if subpoena is abusive or oppressive. OK) - request that gag order be lifted/modified so that the recipient can protest his subpoena in public. (judge is at the FBI mercy here, if they state that this would endanger national security, he/she is explicitly forbidden from lifting or modifying FBI issued gag orders regardless of the facts of the case). All judicial proceedings above must be closed to public or in camera. Basically kangaroo courts. All this makes a mockery of judicial review in these cases. Plus few will be willing to go to courts to challenge FBI orders. No need to bother, this statue gives them (your bank, doctor, employer etc) full immunity from any civil liability. (continues)

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#13)
    by wg on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:50 PM EST
    There is no provision for notification of targets of FBI snooping. Ever. That is you will never be notified that FBI ordered your doctor, your employer, librarian, etc to produce your file. Compare it to Europe. Not only they are required to tell you what information they keep on you, they have to have your explicit permission to release anything to anybody. Long time ago when original Privacy Act was enacted we had a similar right. It was possible, in theory at least, to demand from the FBI a list of all people to whom your file was shown. The FBI never complied with that law (tbomk), now we go back to where we were under Hoover. Thank you Mr. Roberts. Thank you Mr. Mueller. -- To add insult to injury, all this is on top of old Patriot Act. That Act is now made permanent including all those provisions that generated massive protests in the entire country. Sweet. -- This is no done deal. It goes now to Senate Judiciary, full Senate and House later. Dump this legal monstrosity please, enact Security and Freedom Enhanced Act (S. 737) legislation first.

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#14)
    by Jlvngstn on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:50 PM EST
    Isn't it ironic that a vote on on our right to privacy was conducted in a closed door meeting?

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#15)
    by kdog on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:50 PM EST
    The FBI has a tradition of running roughshod over civil liberties and abusing power. We need look no further than the 60-70's, with cointelpro's domestic spying, illegal searches and wiretaps, etc. All Americans should be wary of giving the FBI these new powers. This is not the republic my grandfathers fought for. This is tyranny.

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#16)
    by SeeEmDee on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:50 PM EST
    Just two words describe this: Star Chamber. During the Civil War, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and tried US citizens in military tribunals. Looks like we're sliding back into that kind of 'justice'.

    Yes, a recession or a significant terrorist attack within the states could be used to really turn up the move into fascism. I hope the American people are smart enough at some point to recognize things for what they truly are. Next hope are the 2006 midterm elections. We need a groundswell of voter indignation about the complete mess that Dubya has created - Iraq, AG, Gitmo, the deficit, erosion of civil rights. Dubya has a dependable history of running businesses into the ground, then being bailed out by his Saudi pals. We now live in the United States of Arabia.

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#18)
    by wishful on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:50 PM EST
    Mr. Felt, of deepthroat fame, would never have committed a crime under this new legislation. Poor Liddy, et.al.--they wouldn't have had ammunition to lob at him for being a convicted FBI power abuser. When this immoral snooping happens now, it will be completely legal. This is what we get for so docilely succumbing to the label "consumers" replacing what we used to be--"citizens". Those in power know we are no longer citizens and don't treat us as such. I agree with the poster above who objectively described the situation: tyranny.

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#19)
    by wg on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:52 PM EST
    Isn't it ironic that a vote on on our right to privacy was conducted in a closed door meeting? First of all, it was rational. The learned their lessons with WMD, never go public with those things, look what that got us. My bet is that in order to improve their chances they resorted to scaring the living daylights out of that committee. For example: -- a notebook was found on a Iraqi insurgency battlefield containing a text of a desperate message to their jihadist network in America. It apparently said do everything possible to sabotage this Patriot Act II, if they pass it, we won't be able to wage our holy war with infidels there anymore. Join ACLU, activate librarians, do whatever it takes, God is great, or that they had evidence that the previous campaign to discredit Patriot Act (hundreds of municipalities passing anti Patriot Act resolutions) was organized by the enemies of the U.S., or something equally imaginative. -- All told, needless to say, in utmost confidence which necessitated a secret meeting in the first place. Similar techniques are used widely these days by the feds when dealing with local authorities.

    something equally imaginative.
    Babies being ripped out of incubators? Nah, been done before.

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#21)
    by Ambiorix on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:52 PM EST
    Babies being ripped out of incubators? Nah, been done before.
    You need to refer to the faked "Iraqi devils rip Kuwaiti babies from incubators" story now, to make a point for Patriot Act Expansion?

    Re: Patriot Act Expansion Passes Senate Committee (none / 0) (#22)
    by Jlvngstn on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:59:54 PM EST
    Nicely done, wg / ernesto...