home

Reform?

by TChris

This is what the House of Representatives, by a mostly party-line vote of 217-213, thinks it can sell the public as "lobbying reform":

The new bill would require lobbyists to disclose more of their activities, increase financial penalties for violations and require lawmakers and their aides to attend ethics training. It also aims to discourage earmarks by requiring House members who write spending bills to disclose them, a move lauded by fiscal conservatives who complain that earmarks waste taxpayer money and drive up the cost of legislation.

That's it. The bill doesn't ban members from accepting private trips on corporate jets. It doesn't stop members and their staffs from becoming lobbyists a year after leaving Congress. It allows members to accepts gifts and meals worth $50. As reform goes, the House bill is weak tea.

Why didn't the Republican House come up with a reform plan to match the Senate's?

"This is not John Boehner's forte," Mr. Shays said. "This is not something he believes in."

He believes in receiving gifts. He believes in traveling in style. He believes that the industries he helps today will want to reward him with a lobbying position a year after he leaves Congress. But he doesn't believe in reform.

Let's hope the Senate negotiators will stand up for beliefs that will benefit the public. And lets hope that voters remember who tried to fool them with an illusory reform bill.

< Thursday Open Thread | Defiant, Belligerant Moussaoui Sentenced to Life >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Reform? (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu May 04, 2006 at 06:54:52 AM EST
    Can't get enough of corruption and graft, Does my flying on private aircraft. This here bill, Keeps things still. A fine example of our statecraft.

    Re: Reform? (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu May 04, 2006 at 07:51:14 AM EST
    The only surprise here is that they did anything at all. The institution is corrupt.

    Re: Reform? (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu May 04, 2006 at 08:48:50 AM EST
    Ooooooo "ethics training!" That should fix everything.

    Re: Reform? (none / 0) (#4)
    by squeaky on Thu May 04, 2006 at 10:42:50 AM EST
    This from Think Progress:
    Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) called for restrictions on lobbyist-funded travel on Feb. 28. Six days later, he used "a BellSouth plane to travel to North Carolina and South Carolina." Santorum said he did not have the "luxury" of a self-imposed ban because he is running "one of the most expensive Senate races in the country."
    There you have it. If there were a way to regulate everyone else's behavior sensible Reform would overwhelmingly pass in a second.

    Re: Reform? (none / 0) (#5)
    by swingvote on Thu May 04, 2006 at 11:48:58 AM EST
    Squeaky, Hypocritical congresspersons are the rule, not the exception, and it's hardly surprising that Santorum can't walk the walk after talking the talk. Time and again these people have gotten up on a soapbox to tell all of us how we should live, only to be found later living quite otherwise themselves, and there's always some lame excuse like the one Santorum is offering. If there is a surprise here, it's that the Democratic Party as a whole doesn't support even minimal reform, lame and pathetic as it is.

    Re: Reform? (none / 0) (#6)
    by Sailor on Thu May 04, 2006 at 01:40:56 PM EST
    If there is a surprise here, it's that the Democratic Party as a whole doesn't support even minimal reform, lame and pathetic as it is.
    No, the point is they refused to have anything to do with this crappy piece of legislation.

    Re: Reform? (none / 0) (#7)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu May 04, 2006 at 04:16:38 PM EST
    No, the point is they refused to have anything to do with this crappy piece of legislation. There we go with the lame excuses again. Sounds a lot like Santorum.