home

Can CA Farmers Grow Hemp?

by TChris

Another tangle between state autonomy and federal supermacy is in the making, as Gov. Schwarzenegger decides whether to sign a bill authorizing California farmers to grow industrial hemp.

The rapidly growing plant with a seemingly infinite variety of uses is against federal law to grow because of its association with its evil twin, marijuana. ... But California is the first state that would directly challenge the federal ban, arguing that it does not need a D.E.A. permit, echoing the state's longstanding fight with the federal authorities over its legalization of medicinal marijuana.

You'll recall that California came out on the losing end of the medical marijuana argument. Yet the federal interest in uniformity of drug law enforcement is stronger than its interest in preventing farmers from growing a crop that adds nothing to the supply of illicit drugs.

The hemp bill would require farmers who grow it to undergo crop testing to ensure their variety of cannabis is nonhallucinogenic; its authors say it has been carefully worded to avoid conflicting with the federal Controlled Substances Act. ...

"It would take a joint the size of a telephone pole to have an impact," [Nebraska's agricultural commissioner] said.

It makes little sense that hemp can be imported but not grown.

Hundreds of hemp products, including energy bars and cold-pressed hemp oil, are made in California, giving the banned plant a capitalist aura. But manufacturers must import the raw material, mostly from Canada, where hemp cultivation was legalized in 1998.

Oregon succeeded in arguing that the Controlled Substances Act can't be stretched to regulate a local physician's decision to use drugs to assist a suicide as authorized by state law. California may be equally successful in arguing that the Controlled Substances Act shouldn't be stretched to prevent the cultivation of a useful plant that couldn't get a fly high.

< Race, Katrina, and Republicans | Civilian Deaths in Iraq and Military Accountability >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Can CA Farmers Grow Hemp? (none / 0) (#1)
    by Johnny on Sun Aug 27, 2006 at 11:19:44 PM EST
    Again, I ask... "Can someone please demonstrate to me the actual harm related to the use of pot?" That being posited... The war on hemp is only slightly less absurd than the war on mary-jane. Seriously. Are there any people who actually support the ban on hemp? For real? If so, please, please, please... Explain to me the evils of said product.

    Re: Can CA Farmers Grow Hemp? (none / 0) (#2)
    by Che's Lounge on Sun Aug 27, 2006 at 11:24:09 PM EST
    It saves the environment. Let's evolve people. Link Link

    Re: Can CA Farmers Grow Hemp? (none / 0) (#3)
    by Jlvngstn on Mon Aug 28, 2006 at 05:53:08 AM EST
    I would imagine the risk of growing hemp would allow some people to mix in maryjane in their crops. Patrick????

    Re: Can CA Farmers Grow Hemp? (none / 0) (#4)
    by Patrick on Mon Aug 28, 2006 at 07:19:42 AM EST
    JL, Can't say for sure, if there were male plants in the hemp crop they would pollinate the female MJ plants...Of course a wiley grower could use all female hemp plants thereby reducing the risk.....But at what cost? I don't know for sure. I don't know enough about the legislation to decide whether I'm for or against it. I do know there's no way to legitimately "crop test" the potential amounts that will be grown, or if growing it should necessarily remove someone's rights against search and seizure re the testing....So there's potentially lots of good debate on this one. My gut feeling is it won't pass.