home

Iran vs. U.S. Lawsuit

Here's something else that is not being reported in the U.S. Oral arguments began yesterday in the World Court in a long-standing lawsuit filed by Iran against the United States for damages caused by the US Navy's destruction of three Iranian oil platforms in the Persian Gulf during the Iran-Iraq war. (in 1987-88). The arguments are scheduled to continue until March 7. The case is ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

You can access yesterday's transcripts of the hearing here, and all of the documents here.

Iran argues that the U.S. was not neutral in the conflict as it claimed, but was actively helping Iraq to win its war with Iran. It disputes the U.S. claim that the destruction of the platforms was necessary to protect it's "essential security interest."

The U.S. has acknowledged attacking and destroying the platforms. We find a few of Iran's statements interesting (The U.S. isn't presenting its case until later). Specifically, Iran complains
... that the United States consistently provided intelligence and logistical support for Iraqi aggression against Iran, and that the United States was “concerned that Iraq should not lose the war”.

So, on the one hand, the United States was actively assisting Iraq with its intelligence and logistical support -- which included the supply of “numerous items that had both military and civilian applications, including poisonous chemicals and deadly biological viruses” -- and was giving further indirect assistance by reflagging and escorting Kuwaiti tankers which were shipping cargoes whose proceeds were being used to finance the Iraqi war effort. The United States had no logical or legal reason to support Iraq against Iran: Iraq was the aggressor State who had launched an unprovoked invasion of Iranian territory; Iraq was the party who was using chemical weapons and launching missiles against Iranian civilians; and Iraq was the party who took the conflict to the Persian Gulf by attacking both Iranian and neutral shipping. Iran, on the other hand, was the victim; Iran used only conventional weapons in its defence and respected the laws of warfare; and Iran was the party in whose interest it was to keep the Persian Gulf open to shipping.

There's lots more.

< February 19, 1942...2003? | The Hotline on Hart >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft