home

U.S. Weighing Options for Trial of Iraqi War Crimes

The U.S. is holding 6,850 Iraqi war prisoners. Just a handful are top Iraqi leaders. In deciding what to do with the prisoners, the U.S. says that it is in uncharted legal waters.

Prisoners of war are entitled to the protections of the Geneva Conventions. The U.S. does not dispute this.
Unlike the 660 or so captives held at the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay as part of the American war on terrorism, the POWs in Iraq were combatants in a conventional war, so the United States is bound by the Geneva Conventions in its treatment of them, the U.S. officials said.
The Government says it is leaning towards dividing the prisoners into two groups:
A senior U.S. government official said yesterday that "it's very early in the process" of determining the legal fate of the Iraqi military officials in detention. But the government is inclined to divide those it eventually brings to justice into two groups, allowing Iraqi authorities to try people for "crimes against the Iraqi people," while courts under U.S. auspices would handle "crimes against Americans" such as Iraqi soldiers' waving a white flag before attacking, placing artillery in schools and mosques, and beating U.S. POWs, the official said.

The senior U.S. government official acknowledged the United States is entering uncertain legal territory in Iraq. "We've never had a war-crimes trial in a regular U.S. civil court, or in a court-martial setting, in our 200-plus years of history," he said. Instead, people who committed war crimes against Americans have all been tried before special U.S. military tribunals, the official said.
Friday, the U.S. released 900 Iraqi prisoners, after determining that they were neither members in the military nor participants in "hostile acts." Of the 6,850 that remain, a decision must be made. The Geneva Conventions dictate that Iraqi soldiers or officers have the same legal rights as do U.S. soldiers facing court-martial proceedings.
They would have a right to a lawyer of their choosing and the right to cross-examine witnesses. The judge would have to be independent and impartial, and the standard of proof for conviction is "beyond a reasonable doubt." Appeals could be made all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Amnesty International has called upon the U.S. to allow the United Nations to try the Iraqi war prisoners in Iraq. Here is their April 16th release, Responsibilities of Occupying Powers.
< Sniper Judge Vows to Prosecute Leaks | Scott Peterson: Track and Trace Bug Put in Vehicle >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort: