Fight, Martha, Fight
William Safire provides an insightful explanation in today's New York Times why Martha should fight the charges against her.
I hope she beats the rap because I don't like the idea of a prosecutor — eager to deter others from doing wrong — twisting the law to make an example out of a celebrity. In doing justice, righteous ends don't justify unscrupulous means.
The U.S. attorney has not accused her of the crime of insider trading. After a yearlong investigation, that central matter is nowhere in his indictment. Why not? Because he decided that would be too difficult a charge to persuade a jury to believe.
....Rather than drop the weak case and his chance at national fame, the prosecutor James Comey handed off the insider-trading charge to the S.E.C., which seeks civil damages, not criminal penalties, and must meet a much lower standard of proof. Instead of focusing on what the case is about, Comey told a rapt press conference: "This case is about lying" — to investigators and to investors. "Lying" is a harsh word....But "perjury" is a much harsher word, meaning "lying under oath." Martha Stewart has not been accused of perjury.
< Second Circuit Expedites Jose Padilla Appeal | Max Factor Heir Loses Appeal > |