home

Enron Deals for Drug Offenders

There is an excellent column in the Chicago Sun Times today addressing the injustice of sentences handed out to small time drug offenders in comparison to sentences meted out to Enron-type offenders . Where's the justice?

...criminals in the Enron case won't spend a fraction of the time behind bars that judges order most drug offenders to spend. Some people would argue there are actually two justice systems: one for them and one for us. Certainly, white collar criminals are dealt with less harshly compared to non-violent drug offenders.

Look at the prison time most drug offenders face. Some of them have been sentenced to life terms, even though they haven't committed a heinous crime or murdered anyone.

'60 Minutes' last week featured a segment on mandatory minimum sentences in drug cases.

What passes for a drug king in 99 percent of the cases is nothing more than a young man who can't even afford a lawyer when he's hauled into court," Judge Patrick Murphy told correspondent Ed Bradley. "I've seen very few drug kings."

"It is unjust," Judge John Martin, a Republican appointee to the federal district court, said on the news magazine. "It's taking people who are low-level violators and putting them in jail for 15 to 20 years. I had a situation where a defendant was an addict. He sat on his stoop. People came to him and said, 'Do you know where I can buy some crack?' He told them about an apartment where there was crack being sold. For this, the people who sold it every once in a while gave him some crack for his own personal use. The guideline range for that man was 16 years in jail."

The bottom line?

If Lea Fastow was being accused of helping her husband cook cocaine instead of helping him cook the books, the feds wouldn't have to beg her to take a plea deal.

[hat tip to Ted in Chicago]

< Road Trips | The al-Gebra Movement >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort: