Security and Liberty - We Need Both
We agree with law prof Eric Muller who writes the blog Is That Legal? when he criticizes Andrew McCarthy 's article in National Review about the wall preventing information sharing between intelligence and criminal investigation agencies. McCarthy says:
the "wall was . . . a deliberate and unnecessary impediment to information sharing. . . . It told national-security agents in the field that there were other values, higher interests, that transcended connecting the dots and getting it right."
Eric replies:
Umm, well, yeah. Those "other values" are little things called "civil liberties," and what makes them "higher" is that they're reflected in the highest law of the land, the Constitution. If you read this blog, you'll know that I'm no "sky-is-falling" civil libertarian who has howled about everything law enforcement has done since 9/11. But I am very worried by the direction that today's testimony before the 9/11 Commission is taking, and by what seems to be the Commission's emerging self-appointed role to diagnose problems and recommend changes in law enforcement practices.
< Raiding a Mosque | Report: Fallujah Truce Broken > |