home

War on Drugs Victimizes Farmers

by TChris

An often overlooked casualty of our country's misguided war on drugs is prominently reported in today's New York Times: domestic asparagus farmers. Since the early 1990's, the United States has been subsidizing the asparagus industry in Peru, purportedly to encourage Peruvian farmers to grow asparagus instead of cocaine. The result has been disastrous for American asparagus growers, as companies like Del Monte move their asparagus processing plants from the United States to Peru, where they can buy cheaper asparagus and process it with less expensive workers.

Since 1991, this outsourcing of asparagus production has resulted in a 55 percent decline in Washington farmland devoted to asparagus growing, while asparagus imports from Peru have increased from 4 million pounds to 110 million pounds. The value of the asparagus processing industry in the United States has dropped by about 30 percent.

Can a program that hurts American farmers by subsidizing Peruvian farmers be justified by its reduction of cocaine production?

"The irony is that they didn't plow under the coke to plant asparagus in Peru," said John Bakker, executive director of the Michigan Asparagus Advisory Board. "If you look at that industry in Peru and where it's growing, it has nothing to do with coca leaf growers becoming normal farmers. Coca leaf is grown in the highlands. The asparagus is near sea level."

Peru's government claims that 40 percent of the people working in the asparagus industry come from "coca-producing regions," but that doesn't mean that coca growers have abandoned their crops. The Foreign Agricultural Service "does not believe that Peruvian asparagus production provides an alternative economic opportunity for coca producers and workers — the stated purpose of the act."

Peruvians need jobs, and the development of a significant agricultural industry provides stability to Peru's economy, arguably benefitting the United States in the long run. As with all trade issues, the benefits gained by the United States from the outsourcing of jobs are difficult to measure against the immediate detriment to the people who lose their outsourced jobs -- or in this case, the farmers who can no longer compete with the Peruvian asparagus market.

Yet one issue seems clear: fighting the drug war by subsidizing foreign agricultural endeavors at the expense of American farmers is a losing battle. As one Washington farmer points out: "We're a victim of the drug war." There's still "plenty of cocaine coming into this country," he says, but there's also a plentiful supply of taxpayer-subsidized Peruvian asparagus, against which he can't compete.

< The Religion Debate | Padilla, Hamdi and the Treason Clause >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort: