High Court Weasels Out of Padilla Decision
That's our word for it--weasels--the Associated Press calls it a sidestep. Whatever. The Supreme Court today declined to address the Jose Padilla case on its merits. The opinion is here (pdf):
The Supreme Court sidestepped a third major terrorism case, ruling that a lawsuit filed on behalf of detainee Jose Padilla improperly named Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld instead of the much lower-level military officer in charge of the Navy brig in South Carolina where Padilla has been held for more than two years. Padilla must refile a lawsuit challenging his detention in a lower court.
Update: Scotus blog is blogging live via Blackberry while reading the Padilla and Hamdi opinions. Some of their comments:
Hamdi is 8-1. Within the majority, the 4 Justice plurality (which gives Hamdi intermediate procedural rights) is formed by the dissenters in the Apprendi cases, reflecting their pragmatic take on the Sixth Amendment. The strongest believers in Apprendi - Scalia and Stevens - take the hardest line on the right to get into a criminal court.
More:
< Miranda Takes a Hit | High Court: Foreign Guantanamo Detainees Can Challenge Their Detention > |