Patriot Act: Kerry vs. Bush
What's the difference between Kerry and Bush on the Patriot Act? The Associated Press asked each. Portions of their responses:
Bush: The Patriot Act has already been used to help break up terror cells in New York, Oregon, and Virginia. Safeguards for civil liberties, including traditional judicial review, are built into the Patriot Act. Not a single civil liberties violation associated with the Patriot Act has been cited by the inspector general. Because it has been used effectively and responsibly, I have called upon the United States Congress to promptly renew the expiring provisions of the Patriot Act."
Kerry: As president, I will defend our liberty and our security at home as well as abroad. I will appoint an attorney general who values and protects constitutional freedoms. I believe some provisions of the Patriot Act - like the money laundering provisions - must be made stronger. Others - like the library and 'sneak-and-peek' search provisions - must be made smarter, to better protect the freedom of law-abiding patriotic Americans while allowing our government to do everything necessary to track down terrorists and defend America. As president, I will ensure that the American government is open and responsive to the needs and inquiries of Congress and the public, offering enough information to hold the government accountable without compromising our security."
Actually, Kerry is far better on limiting the excesses of the Patriot than the AP article makes him out to be. He is a co-sponsor and supporter of the SAFE Act. Here's what Senator Durbin (D-IL) said about Kerry's position in a Senate Floor Statement on April 20, 2004, the day Durbin introduced the SAFE Act:
< Where Was Bush? Nowhere to be Found | What Has Bush Done For Us Lately? > |