home

Abu Ghraib: Where's the Accountability?

The New York Times takes President Bush to task for his failure to investigate and hold accountable those responsible for the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. But at the end, it inexplicably gives him another chance:

When the Abu Ghraib prison scandal first broke, the Bush administration struck a pose of righteous indignation. It assured the world that the problem was limited to one block of one prison, that the United States would never condone the atrocities we saw in those terrible photos, that it would punish those responsible for any abuse - regardless of their rank - and that it was committed to defending the Geneva Conventions and the rights of prisoners. None of this appears to be true.

After citing numerous examples of those who have not been held accountable, the Times moves on to Bush's secret creation of a "parallel and unconsitutional judicial universe" at Guantanamo.

The White House was so determined to suspend the normal rights and processes for the hundreds of men captured in Afghanistan - none of them important members of Al Qaeda and most of them no threat at all - that it hid the details from Secretary of State Colin Powell and never bothered to consult Congress.

From there the Times recounts recent revelations of the Administration's transporting prisoners out of Iraq and hiding them from the Red Cross.

To justify that operation after the fact, the same legal offices that produced the infamous paper on how to pretend that torture is legal drew up a new opinion claiming that the president has the right to decide which prisoners are covered by the Geneva Conventions and which are not.

This happened in secret, at the same time that administration officials were testifying at the Senate's Abu Ghraib hearings about the president's allegiance to the Geneva Conventions and to American constitutional values when it came to the treatment of prisoners.

....The gap between the administration's public statements and private actions is enormous.

The Times says the public needs answers and accountability and hopes either Bush or Kerry, whoever is elected, will provide it. That's not a satisfactory conclusion to us. We already know Bush won't provide it. Our only hope, as with so many other issues, lies with Kerry.

It's not just the economy. It's not just the War. It's not just No Child Left Behind. It's the Constitution and its preservation for your children and mine. It's civil liberties. It's respect for the rule of law. Remember that when you're deciding whether to vote on Tuesday. Make sure you vote because if there is one election where it is going to make a difference, this is it.

< Judge Rejects Ohio GOP Voter Challenge | Pew Center: Kerry Gaining With Swing Voters >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort: