home

A Vast Conspiracy

I was going to answer Hugh Hewitt, but August at World o'Crap does it so well, I won't bother.

< Terror Alert in Boston | Fed. Judge Rules Against Detainees >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: A Vast Conspiracy (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Jan 19, 2005 at 09:12:58 PM EST
    Conspiracy to do what? Bush/Fox mexico and aztlan all in one, with you working for a dollar a day. 3 percent rich \elite\oligarchies...see usa\mexico\drugs..see wars on wars. 7 percent police\Army\jugdes\camp system\prison..see usa\mexico 90 percent you\poor\living from day to day and your kids in prison..I.E.Aids\massacre end job done by bush and u.s government with a little help from mexico...payback all of the south west,for mexico, job done new world made from the blood of your kids and you. No Conspiracy here? bush family fox family laden famliy nothing to see here just move on.

    Re: A Vast Conspiracy (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jan 20, 2005 at 12:25:33 AM EST
    Eh, Fred, have you considered comparing this to the past in Mexico? Your telescope is seriously pointed in the wrong direction. Fox reportedly told Bush that his showing up with nada for Fox to announce he got from the pinche Tio Gringo was a political embarassment. Bush laughed. And that relationship has soured, as with most of the Bushliar's associations. His visit to South America, when he was reduced to appearing with the other leaders with his underwear showing through his unzipped pants was a HUGE success with the Pacific leaders. Yahoo published the photos...it was hard to believe one's eyes. He is seen throughout Latin America as a person without respeto. Most people in the world feel exactly the same way. Human friction is quite awesome at times, and some of it is very heroic sandpaper indeed. Gringolandia is in trouble, OK...chingao. But no reason to give up on the power of an alerted democracy. We may not have the answer today to this tyranny, but he has a LOT of concerted nonviolent, WE-WANT-JUSTICE for-his-crimes, enemies. A LOT more than the fake election stats and tiny-sample opinion polls suggest.

    Re: A Vast Conspiracy (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jan 20, 2005 at 01:10:52 AM EST
    Paul, you don't understand what is happening do you? what bush and boys want is mass murder in all areas of this world, but this move for mexico by the bush rats is to setup the people of this nation for civil and race war, and it will work, because that is what the aztlan movement needs or think's it needs. the mass murder of all whites and black's and all non-hispanics inside aztlan, by the way aztlan is a myth and was a made up story by some mexican guy 20 years ago. "Oh yes" bush was big on helping some people and making big dollars in mexico and many other places.

    Re: A Vast Conspiracy (none / 0) (#4)
    by pigwiggle on Thu Jan 20, 2005 at 07:27:09 AM EST
    “But here's why the TalkLeft comment spells doom for the Democratic Party” TL commenter only think they are democrats; a little introspection and they would find they were, in fact, greens or even left of green uber-liberal. And in the case of Fred, Tom, PinLA, et al. left of sane.

    Re: A Vast Conspiracy (none / 0) (#5)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jan 20, 2005 at 08:42:20 AM EST
    Kudos to August for her great piece. Fred and Paul got so excited they apparently started frothing at the mouth and speaking in (unintelligible) tongues. I'm actually glad I couldn't understand them.

    Re: A Vast Conspiracy (none / 0) (#6)
    by john horse on Thu Jan 20, 2005 at 02:27:44 PM EST
    His complaint against Kos amounts to this. "Bloggers should disclose --prominently and repeatedly-- when they are receiving payments from individuals or organizations about whom or which they are blogging. Period." Kos did this by putting his disclaimer on his website but, for some reason, Hewitt "never knew of it." So what Hewitt is saying is that if he doesn't know something that you disclose it is somehow your fault that he doesn't know it. The question isn't Kos's ethics but Hewitt's incompetence.