home

Michael Jackson Opening Arguments

Both sides presented opening arguments today. I'll be doing a live chat for the Washington Post on the openings and case tomorrow at noon, ET. You can submit questions here.

The prosecution's side is in every news story. Very few that I've seen outline the defense. Here's one:

After the nearly three-hour opening by the prosecutor, defence lawyer Thomas Mesereau went on the attack, saying the mother of the accuser fraudulently claimed to many people that she was destitute and that her son needed money for chemotherapy. In truth, he said, the boy’s father was a member of a union that covered his medical bills.

Mesereau said the mother went to comedian Jay Leno for money and Leno was so suspicious that he called Santa Barbara police to tell them he had been contacted and ”something was wrong. They were looking for a mark.”

The mother also approached comedian George Lopez and a Los Angeles TV weatherman who staged a fund-raiser for the child at a comedy club, the lawyer said. “At the fund-raiser, there was (the boy) in the lobby of the Laugh Factory with his hand out, prodded by (his mother),” Mesereau said.

He said celebrities including Mike Tyson and Jim Carrey turned the family away, but Jackson was too sympathetic.“The most vulnerable celebrity became the mark, Michael Jackson,” Mesereau said.

....Jackson was depicted by his attorney as a humanitarian who built his Neverland ranch to give children something he never had – a childhood. He said that an appeal for help by the accuser’s family touched Jackson’s heart and “he took time away from his career to help this family, not knowing that the trap was being set.”

Here's the chat transcript I conducted for the WaPo the first day of jury selection.

< Government Ordered to Charge or Free Jose Padilla | New Mexico House Votes to Abolish Death Penalty >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Michael Jackson Opening Arguments (none / 0) (#1)
    by scarshapedstar on Mon Feb 28, 2005 at 04:22:22 PM EST
    You know, I think Michael might be losing it.

    Re: Michael Jackson Opening Arguments (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Mon Feb 28, 2005 at 09:13:50 PM EST
    I'm still trying to find the relevence. He may or may not have - I don't particularly care. I mean, aren't there more inportant things to be paying attention to? (congrats on the gig, you're gettin' paid, right?)

    Re: Michael Jackson Opening Arguments (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Mon Feb 28, 2005 at 10:38:58 PM EST
    Thomas, it should be obvious that this may be a politically motivated prosecution. There are a ton of reasons to cover it. If you're not interested, scroll on by.

    Re: Michael Jackson Opening Arguments (none / 0) (#4)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Tue Mar 01, 2005 at 05:59:06 AM EST
    I also wondered why the same type of coverage wasn't paid to the defense's opening statements as to the prosecution's. Is this what it's gonna be like with the media? Only the prosecution's story will be told in specific detail and we'll only mostly get the gist what the defense had to say? If so, I think it's ridiculous and that the transcripts should be provided to the public and not just the media who have no interest to fairly covering the trial.

    Re: Michael Jackson Opening Arguments (none / 0) (#5)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Tue Mar 01, 2005 at 08:04:36 AM EST
    "aren't there more inportant things to be paying attention to?" Maybe there is too much attention paid to these celebrity trials in the general media. Talk Left, however, is something of a speciaty site for criminal law issues, and how these celebrity trials are conducted is definitely raises criminal law issues.