home

Filibuster Ads Debut This Week

Congress returns from its Spring Break this week, and among the hot topics will be the Republican attempt to end filibusters over judicial nominations by instilling the nuclear option. Lots of lobbying money will be spent on both sides. Here's what the Democrats have planned:

The liberal group People for the American Way said it was spending $5 million on television advertisements. On Tuesday, the Alliance for Justice will begin running commercials in which an animated character, Phil A. Buster, asks viewers to help "save checks and balances." MoveOn.org is already running ads, and Mr. Kerry's re-election committee will start a newspaper advertising campaign on Tuesday.

Seven Republican Senators may break ranks. If you are one of their constituents, contact them and tell them to oppose changing the filibuster rules:

Olympia J. Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, John McCain of Arizona, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and John W. Warner of Virginia.

Some conservative organizations already have broken ranks:

...a coalition of conservative groups, including the anti-union National Right to Work Committee, the Gun Owners of America and the anti-abortion National Pro-Life Alliance, has recently broken ranks. All argue that changing the rules to prevent filibustering nominees would lead to the elimination of legislative filibusters, which conservatives have relied on to protect gun rights and abortion restrictions.

This is one of the most important votes ever. It is not an overstatement to say that this vote may make or break Bush's choices for up to four of the next Supreme Court justices.

For the Republicans to win the vote, they need half of the Senate plus Vice President Cheney. To defeat it, Democrats need the vote of all 44 Democratic Senators, plus seven more -- the one Independent vote and six Republican votes would do it.

Here are more reasons to preserve the filibuster.

Update: Edwardpig has a good rant against Tom Delay's war on the judiciary. [link via Political Animal.]

< Al Qaeda Claims Credit for Abu Ghraib Attack | Cashing in on the Michael Jackson Trial >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 09:11:50 AM EST
    If the filibuster rules are changed, it's game, set, and match for virtual dictatorship.

    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 10:02:03 AM EST
    uhoh - Now let me see. With the filibuster, a President who has been re-elected and whose party has control of both houses of Congress, cannot reasonably expect his nominations to be debated and voted on. How can you possibly call that "democracy?"

    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#3)
    by glanton on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 11:33:30 AM EST
    I am for ending the filibuster. Let the herd, as Big Tex affectionately calls us, really see the consequences of voting in the party of corporate greed and social tyranny. No milk and sugar in our coffee, please. The Dems need to spend more time running competent, no holds barred campaigns, and less time filibustering.

    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#4)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 02:15:57 PM EST
    Well, according to no less an authority on the rules of the Senate than Robert Byrd himself, there is no need for a vote on nominees at all. The President is free to name appointments as he sees fit. This being the case, discussions of the filibuster, pro or con, are irrelevant.

    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#5)
    by glanton on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 02:24:39 PM EST
    Wouldn't it be better for the Dems to vote up or down, leading to the confirmation of judges who would uphold widespread denunciations of our right to privacy, illegalizations of homosexuality and perhaps even sex out of wedlock, overturn Roe, allow for the reinstitutionalization of creationism and prayer in the public schools, etc.? Etc.? Etc.? Dems could then go to the voters in 2006 and 2008 and say, look, look what you have done, is this what you wanted? Shall we let this continue--shall we surrender completely to the Wal-Mart/Falwell jihad? But no. Such truthtelling requires guts. With a precious few exceptions, the Dems have none. Almost all of Dubya's judges--to a far greater extent than Clinton or Bush I--- have been confirmed anyway, yet the GOP gets to brand the Dems as obstructionist. Let's end the charade, people. If we're going to descend into straight-up fascism, can we not at least go down swinging?

    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#6)
    by Sailor on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 02:38:21 PM EST
    glanton, the problem wth that is we're still stuck with those judges for a lifetime and winning a few elections for 2, 4 or 6 yrs can't counteract the influence of a theocratic judiciary.

    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#7)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 02:47:57 PM EST
    sailor - Go to a mirror: sailor, meet the right. The right, meet sailor.

    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#9)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 05:12:05 PM EST
    glanton - Very well said.

    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#10)
    by Sailor on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 07:05:59 PM EST
    Don't understand what you could possibly mean ppj since most fed judges were appointed by republicans. How can you rightwingers possibly object to a system that has served you so well?

    Re: Filibuster Ads Debut This Week (none / 0) (#11)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sun Apr 03, 2005 at 07:51:28 PM EST
    If sunshine is the best disinfectant, then let the sunshine in instead of hiding behind arcane rules most people really don't care about. Most people are tired of beauracracy and process. They want things done. In a crisis people want someone to make a decision one way or the other - not table one.