Enemy Combatants and Guilt By Association
by TChris
The administration's case against Murat Kurnaz boils down to guilt by association, and demonstrates why the administration's Combatant Status Review Tribunals are an inadequate substitute for judicial review of "enemy combatant" detentions. Kurnaz -- a German-born Turkish citizen -- was arrested in Pakistan and turned over to the U.S. military, which transferred him to Afghanistan for interrogation before sending him to Guantanamo. He's been imprisoned there for three years as an enemy combatant.
But an investigation of Mr. Kurnaz's case reveals no evidence that he ever fought against the United States or planned to.
The administration initially believed that Kurnaz was an associate of Mohamed Atta, who likely piloted a plane into the World Trade Center. Lacking evidence to support that suspicion, the administration now relies on evidence that Kurnaz received food and lodging from Tablighi Jamaat while he traveled in Pakistan. The administration contends that Tablighi Jamaat supports terrorism against the United States, a proposition disputed by some terrorism experts. In any event, basing a three year imprisonment on guilt by association is unconscionable.
< Iraq Judge Spin: Saddam Down in the Dumps | Biden Calls for Closure of Guantanamo > |