A Chilling Effect?
by TChris
There are reasons to worry that jailing reporters will have a chilling effect on the media's willingness to report stories that are based on leaked information. On the other hand, newspapers that suppress stories for fear that reporters will be jailed if they don't reveal their sources aren't doing their job. That seems to be the case in Cleveland.
The editor of The Cleveland Plain Dealer said last night that the newspaper, acting on the advice of its lawyers, was withholding publication of two major investigative articles because they were based on illegally leaked documents and could lead to penalties against the paper and the jailing of reporters.
Plain Dealer editor Doug Clifton says the stories are "profoundly important" and of significant public interest. So why isn't the paper publishing them?
"[The lawyers] said, This is a super, super high-risk endeavor and you would, you know, you'd lose," Mr. Clifton told Editor & Publisher. "The reporters say, 'Well, we're willing to go to jail,' and I'm willing to go to jail if it gets laid on me, but the newspaper isn't willing to go to jail."
Newspapers don't actually go to jail. If the reporters are willing to take the heat, the paper should publish the story. What good is freedom of the press if the press is too chicken to exercise its freedom?
< MTV to Rebroadcast 10 Hours of Live 8 - Commerical Free | London Bombing: Home Grown Terrorists? > |