home

Roman Polanski Wins Libel Suit Against Vanity Fair

Good news for Roman Polanski, he has won his libel suit against Vanity Fair. Many wonder why he brought the suit. Here's why.

In July, 2002, the magazine had reported Polanski propositioned another woman at Elaine's on the way to Sharon Tate's funeral. Polanski wasn't in New York at the time - he had been in London when his pregnant wife was murdered, and flew directly to L.A. He proved that at the libel trial, and eventually, even Vanity Fair conceded they were wrong. But then, they said, they were only wrong as to timing. But Mia Farrow testified that he had been brushing women's attention off after Sharon Tate's death and that he was devasted by the murder. Polanski testified by video from France, since had he gone to London where the trial was held, he would have been arrested and extradited back to the U.S. for a charge that he had sex with a 13 year old girl more than 25 years ago. Polanski fled the U.S. while on bail before sentencing on the charge. He is a French citizen and cannot be extradited from France.

Polanski was awarded £50,000 in damages. But,also,

Conde Nast was ordered to pay £175,000 costs within 14 days, and faces a legal bill which could top £1m.

< Administration Resists Order to Disclose Abu Ghraib Pictures | Roberts dissents from suppression order today >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    This guy is creepy.

    Re: Roman Polanski Wins Libel Suit Against Vanity (none / 0) (#2)
    by Patrick on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:01:35 PM EST
    Regardless of the circs, a wanted fugitive should not be able to use the courts for gain.

    Interesting point, Patrick. Any statutory basis for freezing any possible proceeds from the libel suit. I also don't like the idea of the guy running from the criminal courts and using the civil courts in the same country.