home

Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'?

Anti-war and human rights activist Dr. Habib Siddiqui, has some unkind words for New York Times reporter Judith Miller. Writing for al-Jazeera, he calls her a "Yellow Journalist."

The role of a good reporter is like that of an intelligence analyst who digs for the truth, and not of a stenographer who simply reports what he/she hears without verification. Regrettably, Miller has been nothing but an eavesdropper, and if I may add, a terrible one in that. For the War Party she performed miracles by essentially becoming its spokeswoman. Earlier in the program, she described her role as the conveyor of official news rather than of a skeptical reporter: “My job was not to collect information and analyze it independently as an intelligence agency; my job was to tell readers of the New York Times as best as I could figure out, what people inside the governments who had very high security clearances, who were not supposed to talk to me, were saying to one another about what they thought Iraq had and did not have in the area of weapons of mass destruction.”

[hat tip Patriot Daily.]

< Able Danger: Gorelick Smear Unjustified | CCR Challenges Collect Call Rates From NY Prisons >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#1)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:31 PM EST
    Yellow journalism is certainly the term for Miller's reporting that has rung true for me. I had not appreciated the perfect fit as applied to Miller until reading this from Dr. Habib Siddiqui's article.   
    It was probably William Randolph Hearst – the newspaper mogul – who first popularized yellow journalism in the Americas to spark off war hysteria. In the 1890s he sent the artist Frederick Remington to Cuba to illustrate articles on an alleged revolt against the Spanish rule. Remington and his fellow journalists searched for signs of revolt but could not find any. He wrote to Hearst, “There is no war,” and requested to be called back. Hearst sent him a cable that read, “Please remain. You furnish the pictures, I’ll furnish the war.” The rest is history! Soon the Spanish-American war was to break out in which America discovered herself as an imperial power and conquered Cuba and Puerto Rico.
    Hearst's ship was docked near the Independence when it was sabatoged; an act most likey perpetuated by Hearst and his US Gov cronies to make the case for war against Spain. Miller and her shadow Sulzberger can easily be substituted for Hearst in the Iraq war story. Surprise , surprise ,surprise, some things never change.

    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#2)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:31 PM EST
    Typo alert: that is perpetrated. Later comes the perpetuation of the perpetration. There all perps nonetheless.

    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#3)
    by fafnir on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:31 PM EST
    Ouch! Sadly too many so-called journalists swim in the same canary-colored swamp:
    One wonders, where did Miller learn the art of journalism? Unfortunately, it is not Miller alone who could take the full credit for Yellow Journalism. As Michael Massing in his 7,000-word analysis in the New York Review of Books "Now They Tell Us," (Feb. 26, 2004) noted, “In the period before the war, US journalists were far too reliant on sources sympathetic to the administration. Those with dissenting views—and there were more than a few—were shut out. Reflecting this, the coverage was highly deferential to the White House. This was especially apparent on the issue of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction—the heart of the President's case for war. Despite abundant evidence of the administration's brazen misuse of intelligence in this matter, the press repeatedly let officials get away with it.”


    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#4)
    by ppjakajim on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:31 PM EST
    From the post:
    Writing for al-Jazeera, he calls her a "Yellow Journalist."
    Uh, huh. Sure. No doubt about it. THE model for journalistic integrity Do you guys ever stop and consider the source? Oh I know. Squeaky hates the NY Post. Sailor can’t stand Powerline. Everyone hates Newsmax and Drudge… And Squeaky opines…
    I had not appreciated the perfect fit as applied to Miller until reading this from Dr. Habib Siddiqui's article.
    Make that double "Huh?

    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#5)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:31 PM EST
    PPJ- don't worry, with stem cell therapy now available you may be able to get help.

    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#6)
    by ppjakajim on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:31 PM EST
    Troll is as troll does, Squeak. And anyone who starts to believe al-Jazeera does need help.

    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#7)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:32 PM EST
    PPJ-It has vastly greater international respect than FOX or the NY Post. Ever read it? It also has actual journalists on staff a concept that must be mindboggling for you.

    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#9)
    by glanton on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:32 PM EST
    "Squeaky hates the NY Post. Sailor can’t stand Powerline. Everyone hates Newsmax and Drudge" You forgot to add one. None of those you mentioned turn to the National Enquirer for their news, either.

    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#11)
    by John Mann on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:32 PM EST
    Jim muttered:
    And anyone who starts to believe al-Jazeera does need help.
    Here's an op-ed from Al Jazeera, Jim. Do you believe it?

    Re: Judith Miller: 'Yellow Journalist'? (none / 0) (#12)
    by aw on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:33 PM EST
    John, I'll bet money you won't get an anwer to that question. Maybe you should ask it in every post ala Cindy then watch him ignore it.