home

Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals

by TChris

The right wing built its power by embracing extremism, but surely those who still claim to be “compassionate conservatives” will publicly oppose this hate mongering:

Members of a church say God is punishing American soldiers for defending the United States, a country that harbors gays, and they brought their anti-gay message to the funerals Saturday of two Tennessee soldiers killed in Iraq. …

The Rev. Fred Phelps, founder of Westboro Baptist Church in, Topeka, Kan., contends that American soldiers are being killed in Iraq as vengeance from God for protecting a country that harbors gays. …

The church members carried signs and shouted things such as "God hates fags" and "God hates you."

Remember when the left was denounced for “fuzzy thinking”? What about denouncing unthinking hatred?

< Open Thread: Hurricane Katrina | Sex Offenders Murdered in Bellingham, WA >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#58)
    by jimakaPPJ on Tue Aug 30, 2005 at 10:59:17 AM EST
    Roger writes:
    Sorry, that should read that I am solid RINO
    Hmmm... Dreams can come true...it can happen to you.... ;-) Et al – Their arrogance is astounding. The practice of putting names on crosses without receiving permission demonstrates that the anti-war people do not respect either the soldiers, or their families. The guideline should be simple. Ask first. If no answer, or if the answer is no, DON’T DO IT! Ernie - Not the same. The Operation name is merely an identifier as to where he was killed and what he was engaged in. It neither endorses or opposes the war.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#59)
    by Kitt on Tue Aug 30, 2005 at 11:04:18 AM EST
    Me: This is such a clean war, ya know. You: NO such thing never has never will be.
    I was being sarcastic.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#60)
    by Kitt on Tue Aug 30, 2005 at 11:05:39 AM EST
    Thanks, Paul (in LA)

    I actually live in Smyrna, TN where Phelps staged one of his pathetic protests this weekend. He is obviously a kook; and the debate on whether he is a Democratic or Republican kook is meaningless. To show up and disrupt a funeral is unexcusable. To harass wounded veterans trying to heal at Walter Reed Hospital is also unexcusable. In my mind Phelps and Code Pink are as alike as peas in a pod. Both think that pushing their agenda is more important than basic, common decency.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#62)
    by jimakaPPJ on Tue Aug 30, 2005 at 12:45:21 PM EST
    Tom - May not be important, but the facts are, both are Demos.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#64)
    by glanton on Tue Aug 30, 2005 at 01:21:33 PM EST
    Great job, DA, that is the main point. Staying on task is hard sometimes with these people. Not much homophobia in the Dems, people. The Democrats are in fact the only place homosexuals can turn to protect their supposedly inalienable civil rights. FACT: The GOP base doesn't differ substantially from Phelps's views on homosexuality. Sure, they don't approve of protesting the funerals, but they're inarguably on board with the fear of boys kissing.

    Not the same. The Operation name is merely an identifier as to where he was killed and what he was engaged in. It neither endorses or opposes the war.
    Ummm not quite; the whole concept of the op-name is to serve as an endorsement, i.e. "Iraqi Freedom".

    oops...2:26 pm was mine

    "To harass wounded veterans trying to heal at Walter Reed Hospital is also unexcusable." TO CREATE THOSE DISFIGURED VETS IN THE FIRST PLACE is what is inexcusable. "In my mind Phelps and Code Pink are as alike as peas in a pod." Then you are an IMBECILE. CodePink started by women fasting in front of the White House to try to stop the illegal invasion. Now 130,000+ Iraqis are dead. 30,000+ veterans are disfigured. Something like 5,000 US-aligned soldiers are dead. But you think CP is the problem. THAT'S HILARIOUS "Both think that pushing their agenda is more important than basic, common decency." Common decency? Like taking a vacation a month? Like laughing about not finding WMD under the pillows in the Oval Office? Troll-logic. You wouldn't know decency if it bit you on your brain.

    Paul, I'm sorry that you were upset so by my comment. Perhaps I can clarify my earlier point. 1. Phelps and his group believe that their cause is so important that they intentionally disregard the feelings of families trying to do nothing more than lay their loved one to rest with some degree of dignity. He disrupts funerals for heaven's sake, not demonstrations, speeches or rallies. He obviously thinks that advancing his cause overrides the basic human decency or courtesy that 99.99% of humans would extend to a grieving family. 2. Code Pink is a group which believes that their cause is so important that they intentionally disregard the feelings of wounded veterans trying to do nothing more than recover from their injuries with some degree of dignity. They disrupt hospitals for heaven's sake, not demonstrations, speeches or rallies. They obviously think that advancing their cause overrides the basic human decency or courtesy that 99.99% of humans would extend to a wounded person and his family. Why do they seem so alike to me? Because: a) their actions are similar, b) their disregard for others is similar, 3) their conviction that their cause overrides all other considerations is similar, and 4) their uncaring willingness to inflict emotional pain on emotionally vunerable people is similar. Obviously there are differenced between the two groups, but to me the similarities outweigh the differences.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#69)
    by Kitt on Tue Aug 30, 2005 at 06:23:21 PM EST
    Re: Code Pink - "They disrupt hospitals for heaven's sake, not demonstrations, speeches or rallies." No, they don't. They're not allowed inside. I don't know if they're allowed on the grounds of the hospital or if Walter Reed is a closed or open campus. So rather than confront the health care issues they bring up or the sanitatizing of the wounded of this war, along with their long-term care issues, it's attack those who bring them into the spotlight. It's been going on since the end of March and the vigils are held on Fridays only.

    Re: Kitt on his Re: Code Pink - "They disrupt hospitals for heaven's sake, not demonstrations, speeches or rallies." See you and raise - "They disrupt funerals for heaven's sake, not demonstrations, speeches or rallies." No, they don't. They're not allowed inside the churches or cemetaries. Anyone who is half aware can tell from numerous news accounts that both Phelps and Code Pink choose the locations for their demonstrations because of the close proximity to dead or wounded veterans. It is obvious from news accounts that the families of the dead know Phelps is around and the injured and their families know Code Pink is around. It is also readily apparent from news accounts that those emotionally vunerable people would just as soon not have to contend with the presence of either Phelps or Code Pink. If Phelps or Code Pink want to protest at City Hall, or the White House, or in Crawford, TX then more power to them. By deliberately choosing to intrude into areas where their presence causes more pain to people who are already hurting, physically and emotionally, they display a callousness that goes beyond mean-spiritedness. It is nothing but cruelty. Their actions are similar, the effect is similar, their narcissistic insistence that their cause outweighs common decency is similar. A pox on both their houses.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#71)
    by glanton on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 09:09:05 AM EST
    Ask the loved ones of the thousands of Metthew Shepards out there if it's worth parsing the difference between Phelps's position on gay rights and, say, Dubya's or Santorum's. Perhaps to them it would be worth it. A life of imprisonment and/or never ending marginalization is better than outright violent murder, I suppose. But I also suspect they would rather have seen their loved ones "allowed" to live their lives fully, openly, and peacefully.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#72)
    by glanton on Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 09:09:48 AM EST
    Above should be Matthew, of course.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#1)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    Well, Rule #1 is that More Jesus = Better Than.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#2)
    by jen on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    Well, Rule #1 is that More Jesus = Better Than I don't think these people pay that much attention to Jesus.

    Shame on all who've accused conservatives of being compassionless. Their exceedingly high tolerance for blind hatred actually shows great inclusiveness of that which makes the rest of us shudder in revulsion.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#4)
    by soccerdad on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    Phelps is a real certified lunatic. he is the most extreme of the extreme. He does not have the same connections to the Right as say Robertson.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#5)
    by DawesFred60 on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    This would be funny if it wasn't for the dead guys, but maybe Fred Phelps is a gay guy and was in love with one of the troopers that was killed? maybe Phelps wife is a shemale and phelps need's some loving from the gods? i hope the "gods", open his mind and heart soon because the "gods", are coming back to free us all, sad,sad, world. but maybe the one god will send him to hell for being a real nut case, who knows anymore? to bad, we can't have a waco on Phelps, but the two guys who died for him wouldn't want that to happen, but i do.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#6)
    by kdog on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    God hates extremists.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#7)
    by Patrick on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    so the question remains, as disgusting as this form of speech is, should it remain protected? Of course the answer is yes, so why publicize it. These people do not speak for the majority, nor are they representative of conservative values. It's disingenous to try to link the two together. Kind of like saying all muslims are terrorists.

    That's it. Pile on, folks. And then, right at that most embarrassing moment, someone will leave a comment pointing out that Phelps is in fact a Democrat. To which the collected outrage here will shift to Phelps being "more representative" of the "religious right extremist wingnut," and -- though the example deployed for this post was a bad one -- the point still stands. Meaning, roughly, this Democrat represents "right wingers" -- and, not surprisingly, that this post is, when you really stop to think about it, "fake but accurate."

    "Phelps is in fact a Democrat." And he sat next to Jimmy Carter at the Topeka Tastee-Freez!

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#11)
    by swingvote on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    Jeff, Phelps is simply proof that religious extremism, complete kookery, and general intolerance toward others, is not limited to "the right", no matter how many times you see it posted otherwise here. There are stupid people on both ends of the spectrum, as well as everywhere in between. The right has no monopoly on idiocy or hate.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#12)
    by Kitt on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    So - what if Phelps is a democrat? He's a nut! What does party affliation have to do with the kind of crap he does? (Mother Jones - March/April 1999) "Phelps remained prominent in state and local politics, working for years as a major organizer for the state's Democratic Party. (He still calls himself a Democrat, refusing to change just because his party has.......But Phelps' campaign against homosexuality actually began in earnest just before the 1992 campaign, when politicians, especially Democrats, began to openly court gay voters..)" One of his daughters alleges some pretty striking evidence of physical abuse and as a result of her 'leaving' the family was told: 'In the years since she left, Bird has spoken to her family on only a handful of occasions. She says when she left, she knew there would be no coming back. Her father had always made it clear: "You're either with us or against us." Who's that sound like? And in the future, Jeff, if you want to make your point - try something more current than something from 7 years ago. I would surmise Mr. Phelps retains his 'democrat' label to embarass that party, just as he does 'christians.' He is consummate street theater - unfortunately.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#13)
    by glanton on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    justpaul: Whatever. Keep telling yourself they're the same. Phelps is a Democrat in the same way that Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmonmd were at one time Democrats and in the same way that Zell Miller still calls himself a Democrat.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#14)
    by swingvote on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    Keep telling yourself they're the same. Phelps is a Democrat in the same way that Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmonmd were at one time Democrats and in the same way that Zell Miller still calls himself a Democrat. Thank you for proving, once again, your own intolerance and ignorance, Glanton. Phelps may well be the perfect representaive for your school of thought. Blind, stupid, hatred, with no redeeming qualities and nothing substantive to offer, ever. Zell Miller is more of a Democrat than the majority of those who claim the title.

    "There are stupid people on both ends of the spectrum, as well as everywhere in between. The right has no monopoly on idiocy or hate." I think some of the stupid people jp writes of include those who won't recognize the truth of his last sentance.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#16)
    by glanton on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    "Zell Miller is more of a Democrat than the majority of those who claim the title." You know, I've heard Sean Hannity and Miller himself say the same thing a thousand times but I really don't understand it. Maybe you can help me. Let's see: Miller is against progressive taxation of any kind. He would have Roe overturned. He would have Lawrence v Texas overturned. He would have creationism taught in schools. He is pro business on every issue imaginable, ranging from health insurance to the environment. He has declared on more than one occasion that Americans don't have a right to privacy, would ban music and video games and literature and works of art offensive to the Christian Right, etc. The list goes on. Yeah, Miller's a true Democrat if you're talking about 1849. Rebuttal?

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#17)
    by TomK on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    Fred Phelps is really someone to feel sorry for. He is obviously gay, and obviously hates himself so much for it. Fred Phelps isn't the problem with homophobia in america. He is a symptom of it.

    The list goes on. Yeah, Miller's a true Democrat if you're talking about 1849. Rebuttal?
    I lived in Georgia back when Miller was Governor of the state. They didn't give him the name of "Zig Zag Zell" for nothing!

    At this stage, I'm increasingly surprised that Phelps hasn't incurred what you'd expect to be a hazard of picketing funerals: having the living snot kicked out of him by people who were already upset to begin with. (It occurs to me that, if he were injured in such an altercation, he'd probably sue. But if he were killed outright, the other parties would probably get off light--especially considering how many Americans would probably unwallet for their defense. I'm recommending any of this, obviously, but you can see how it would play out.)

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#20)
    by jen on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    Molly: puleeze lets not start imitating Pat Robertson!!

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#21)
    by roger on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    If it were the funeral of my loved one, I would kick the snot out of him, let him sue and good luck collecting. I think that I would go to jail rather than pay him a dime. As for being registered as a dem, I am registered Repub (for various reasons). Those who know me by the comments section may be suprised by that. However my registration reads, I still vote Dem, so dont be suprised if a particular person`s registration has other motives besides the party platform.

    Jen--I got no dogs in this fight. My kin are so healthy, if Phelps wanted to picket their funerals, he'd probably have to shoot them first.

    OH!! and that should have read: "I'm not recommending any of this, obviously, . . . "

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#24)
    by jen on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    If it were my family members I would -- I don't know, probably get incoherent angry and barf on their shoes or something.

    Being a Democrat is not the same as registering as one. Check justpaul -- I think his battery just ran out. Pink rabbits banging drums -- blind, deaf, and dumb. Troll logic; SO not democratic. "Help him! Help him! Help who? Help the bombadier! But I'm the bombadier! Then help him, help him!"

    Let me get this straight, Glanton. Your complaint is that the article is 7 years old, and that Phelps still self-identifies as a Democrat, even if you don't want him to? Uh, okay. But do remember that this post started off by asking "compassionate conservatives" to distance themselves from...well, an extremist who turned out to be a Democrat. Why not just admit what everyone here knows: that the post was built on a bad premise, and the ludicrousness of the premise was thrown into stark reality by the misidentification of Phelps? Is it really that difficult to identify a mistake when you see one?

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#27)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    Dobson can cure gays and democrats. As the truly compassionate one, he has just the ticket for Phelps. Gay therapy and democrat adjustment. Finally Phelps can rid himself of those homo and democratic voices in his head for ever. The two blights allegedly stem from the same bad childhood experieces. The two similar remedial treatments can be combined for a small additional charge (almost a twofer). They are were inspired by the cure depicted in Clockwork Orange. Although Dobson claims to have had made major improvements in the technique, Burgess and Kubrick are suing for patent infringment.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#28)
    by glanton on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    Jeff: I'm not "complaining" about Phelp's "self-identification" at all, nor that of Miller for that matter--I am laughing about it though, and laughing even harder at the attempts of some on this thread to equivocate Democratic and Republican bases in terms of bigotry. And I could give a flip about the article. Miller has always voted and spoken like an ultra-conservative Republican, and Phelps is obviously fringe right. It doesn't matter how they're registered. And justpaul, in case your batteries ever do recharge, don't be too hard on yourself. Neither Hannity nor Miller ever explained or defended what they meant by that ridiculous statement, either.

    Why not just admit what everyone here knows: that the post was built on a bad premise, and the ludicrousness of the premise was thrown into stark reality by the misidentification of Phelps?
    Mis-identified? I don't see any place in the original post where Phelps is identified as Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative. TChris asks whether "compassionate conservatives" will condemn Phelps' picketing of soldiers' funerals. As I recall, it's the "compassionate" crowd that opposes legislation to recognize the rights of gay Americans. (We Democrats are "the party of gay marriage," remember?) If your response is a reliable measure, Jeff, the answer to TChris' question is: Of course not. Phelps gives you a twofer--a nominal Democrat who supports the conservative point of view.

    Oh, lookie at Quaker! -- never met a post he won't parse to the last diacritical mark to show just how clever he is at deconstructing the obvious! Listen, if we're going to pretend that the original post was not attempting to embarrass conservatives by identifying what TChris thought was a member of the base, then you win. If we're going to be honest, though, we'll just agree that Phelps is a kook, and that he represents the vast majority of Democrats about as much as he does the vast majority of Republicans. But arguing this any further is ridiculous.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#31)
    by glanton on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    Jeff, what makes Phelps a kook in the eyes of the Republican base is that he thinks American soldiers are dying because of gays. As far as his blind hatred of gays goes, he's very mainstream within the GOP base, however. This is self evident. Keep twittering and equivocating, though. It is posts like yours that prove political blogs can provide entertainment.

    "Remember when the left was denounced for “fuzzy thinking”?" Pretty funny comment TChris, considering.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#33)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    Roger – Say it aint so! BTW – One article I read said they had very heavy police presence. QIB – Come on. The premise had to have been that this guy was a Repub Conservative Right Winger. Let’s face it. He is a Democratic nut. T Chris just got caught profiling. ;-) PIL writes: Being a Democrat is not the same as registering as one. In some states you can vote only in the primary elections of the party you are registered in. In many places membership in a party is an important element in business relations. Some people are just a RINO or DINO. DA – Given that he probably would have filed charges had the Demos forced him to register, I would say he just walked right in and did it. Probably the same way Robertson and Fallwell registered Repub. Stuff happens, eh?

    The premise had to have been that this guy was a Repub Conservative Right Winger.
    Well, if it's that obvious, it shouldn't be a problem for you to point out where TChris said that. Please do so.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#35)
    by glanton on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    Who cares how he's registered?????? Jeff, justpaul, sarcastic, and PPJ are being idiots, and not very useful ones either :-O Anyone care to explain the diff between a GOP right winger and a DEM right winger?

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#36)
    by jen on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    one's a dumbo the other's a jackass?

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#37)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    JeffG Embarrassing? This post was built on a solid premise. I am not sure what you hope to show with your nit picking point here. It is irrelevant whether or not he is a democrat, republican or certified nut case. His basic point that homosexuality is the Devils work is shared by a substantial block of right wing religious voters who use the knee jerk shame of homosexuality as a focal point to garner financial support for their own agendas.
    It is tempting to see in all this a vast right-wing conspiracy, à la Hillary Clinton. Levine would take exception to that charge. "This isn’t a conspiracy, but a strategy," she says. "The right is using people’s legitimate anxieties around sexuality to fuel their own larger goals.
    Nut case or not he sure has garnered more than a fringe of support, and I doubt that the pro votes were Democrat.
    More recently, Phelps was the subject of nationwide controversy when his family proposed, in a referendum, the removal of workplace protection for homosexuals in Topeka. The measure was defeated, 53 percent to 47 percent.
    Seems like he is not too far from the mainstream here. He is extreme and perhaps does not have Chimpy's ear, but James Dobson, Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell certainly do. He is a lightning rod for the right's 'culture war' even if he is/was a Dem.
    All of us, hetero- and homosexual, should recognize that this is a primary issue in the so-called "culture wars" in America. This is where the Relgious Right is focusing a significant percentage of its attention because, if they lose on this, they may never again have the chance to impose their vision upon our society by peaceful means. They really need to win on this in order to maintain any degree of status and importance in American political life.
    link

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#38)
    by Kitt on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    ...But do remember that this post started off by asking "compassionate conservatives" to distance themselves from...well, an extremist who turned out to be a Democrat. Have you said anything about Fred Phelps' message or are you just wanting to point out party affiliation? I don't what his party affiliation is, he's a f*cking nut. His absurd preoccupation with 'fags' and how G*d supposedly feels is directly in step with some notable other dimwits espousing Christianity who have been described as 'compassionate conservatives.' Molly, NYC: Phelps came to Idaho in June to protest the funeral of the first Idaho woman killed in Iraq. Same kind of crap as elsewhere. I don't know about elsewhere but here, the police had Phelps & his gang 'quarantined' across the street from the auditorium where people were entering (which was on private property at the College of Idaho) and when Phelps complained about remarks & gestures, the police moved a line of squad cars and a fire tanker truck in front of them (as in across the street 'in front' of them) which basically shut down their line of sight. They were there half an hour and left. I do NOT care whatever else this man espouses or to which political party he aligns himself. His behaviour and actions based on this one issue alone is enough for me to .... write him off. And - the last I heard, Fred was hunting down the king of Sweden (the tsunami and the role it really played in the deaths of all those poor Swedes who died)

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#39)
    by roger on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    Jim, You got me pegged, solid Dino. Just like Phelps is a Dino. I wouldnt protest W`s funeral, and I hate the man. Barging in on a funeral is just so no class...........

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#40)
    by roger on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:54 PM EST
    Sorry, that should read that I am solid RINO

    Phelps and his band of scum threatened to turn out here in Bakersfield to protest at the funeral of Ramon Villatoro, who was killed in Iraq. The whole damn town turned out and lined the route to the cemetery. The gutless Phelps and his sheep failed to show. Maybe it was the bikers circling the area who were itching to club them. The town was united, left and right, in our determination to not let this idiot ruin the memorial service.

    "Remember when the left was denounced for “fuzzy thinking”? What about denouncing unthinking hatred?" Yep they and the predators protesting at Walter Reed, AND those at Crawford who refuse to take the names off their crosses when asked to by parents are ALL ALL the type of pale pallid slimy creatures that you might find when you turn over a rotten log, those who would intrude so on the pain of the parents of slain and wounded soldiers should get the scron and derision they deserve. What Party is this guy registered to? One of the fringe loony ones I would imagine.

    Oh he is a Democrat? Doesn't matter he is still a maggot. Now that I have absolved the Democratic Party of any taint by this lowlife. I await comments here on YOUR opinion of those who harras the invalided soldier at Walter Reed, or those who insist on usin the names of slain soldiers in protest ensigna when ASKED by the Parents to remove them. Are you willing to denounce and reject them as well?

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#44)
    by Kitt on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:56 PM EST
    I await comments here on YOUR opinion of those who harras the invalided soldier at Walter Reed, or those who insist on usin the names of slain soldiers in protest ensigna when ASKED by the Parents to remove them. Spelling & grammar are always a plus. Code Pink is and has been since early this year holding vigil at Walter Reed to highlight how our wounded are brought in 'under the cover of night.' This is such a clean war, ya know. As for those names on the crosses at Camp Casey? Is that it? Those names on crosses requasked to be removed have been removed. To say otherwise is an outright lie. Family members who were in Crawford & requested as such were escorted by the police and their requests fulfilled.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#45)
    by Kitt on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:56 PM EST
    I await comments here on YOUR opinion of those who harras the invalided soldier at Walter Reed, or those who insist on usin the names of slain soldiers in protest ensigna when ASKED by the Parents to remove them. Spelling & grammar are always a plus. Code Pink is and has been since early this year holding vigil at Walter Reed to highlight how our wounded are brought in 'under the cover of night.' This is such a clean war, ya know. As for those names on the crosses at Camp Casey? Is that it? Those names on crosses requasked to be removed have been removed. To say otherwise is an outright lie. Family members who were in Crawford & requested as such were escorted by the police and their requests fulfilled.

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#46)
    by Kitt on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:56 PM EST
    Sorry about the double post. I got some weird error posting about curbing malicious posters?!

    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#47)
    by Kitt on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:56 PM EST
    Since I seem to be the only one up, I just read this at 'One Mother's Stand' - the daily posting from Truthout.org
    t r u t h o u t | One Mother's Stand By Scott Galindez Monday 29 August 2005 8:48 PM A beautiful moment just happened at Camp Casey I. There was a candle light vigil honoring troops who have died in Iraq. The counter protesters came across the street and joined the vigilers at Camp Casey, They shared the flag and prayed together for the families on both sides who have lost loved ones in the war. They are now singing and holding candles together. This is a testament to the power of this movement."


    I does look like their initial refusal has been altered recently
    Mother takes son's name off memorial SANTA BARBARA A mother persuaded organizers of an anti-war memorial to remove her son's name from a weekly beach display of crosses representing U.S. troops killed in Iraq. Debbie Argel Bastian said she didn't believe the cross was a tribute and considered it an insult to her son, 28-year-old Air Force Capt. Derek Argel, who was killed Memorial Day in a plane crash. The cross with his name was among more than 1,800 erected in the sand each weekend here in a memorial dubbed Arlington West. "Their Web page says 'Wage Peace," said Bastian, of Lompoc. "I think they're trying to convey victims of war. Derek is not a victim of this war. He is a grown man, well-trained. He knew what he was doing. He would not want his name associated with an anti-war movement.' Memorial organizers Santa Barbara Veterans for Peace initially resisted requests from Bastian and Argel's widow Wendy that they remove the name of the special tactics officer. They relented this week after hearing from Bastian, but urged her to visit the display and reconsider


    Code Pink is and has been since early this year holding vigil at Walter Reed to highlight how our wounded are brought in 'under the cover of night.' This is such a clean war, ya know
    Yep they sure have. Oh you can see a video of them here. Anti-War Protests Target Wounded at Army Hospital By Marc Morano CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer August 25, 2005 See Marc Morano's Video Report Washington (CNSNews.com) - The Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., the current home of hundreds of wounded veterans from the war in Iraq, has been the target of weekly anti-war demonstrations since March. The protesters hold signs that read "Maimed for a Lie" and "Enlist here to die for Halliburton." Among the props used by the protesters are mock caskets, lined up on the sidewalk to represent the death toll in Iraq. Code Pink Women for Peace, one of the groups backing anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan's vigil outside President Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, organizes the protests at Walter Reed as well ************************************** And of COURSE they are doing this to SUPPORT the Troops, so let's read what one of the Troops there had to say? ************************************** But the anti-war activists were unapologetic when asked whether they considered such signs as "Maimed for a Lie" offensive to wounded war veterans and their families. "I am more offended by the fact that many were maimed for life. I am more offended by the fact that they (wounded veterans) have been kept out of the news," said Kevin McCarron, a member of the anti-war group Veterans for Peace. Kevin Pannell, who was recently treated at Walter Reed and had both legs amputated after an ambush grenade attack near Baghdad in 2004, considers the presence of the anti-war protesters in front of the hospital "distasteful." When he was a patient at the hospital, Pannell said he initially tried to ignore the anti-war activists camped out in front of Walter Reed, until witnessing something that enraged him. "We went by there one day and I drove by and [the anti-war protesters] had a bunch of flag-draped coffins laid out on the sidewalk. That, I thought, was probably the most distasteful thing I had ever seen. Ever," Pannell, a member of the Army's First Cavalry Division, told Cybercast News Service. "You know that 95 percent of the guys in the hospital bed lost guys whenever they got hurt and survivors' guilt is the worst thing you can deal with," Pannell said, adding that other veterans recovering from wounds at Walter Reed share his resentment for the anti-war protesters. "We don't like them and we don't like the fact that they can hang their signs and stuff on the fence at Walter Reed," he said. "[The wounded veterans] are there to recuperate. Once they get out in the real world, then they can start seeing that stuff (anti-war protests). I mean Walter Reed is a sheltered environment and it needs to stay that way. ************************************* NOPE no sheltered environment for invalid soldiers. Still some of the protesters even are starting to have doubts
    At least one anti-war demonstrator conceded that standing out in front of a military hospital where wounded soldiers and their families are entering and exiting, might not be appropriate. "Maybe there is a better place to have a protest. I am not sure," said a man holding a sign reading "Stop the War," who declined to be identified.


    Re: Religous Extremists Protest Soldiers' Funerals (none / 0) (#51)
    by Kitt on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:02:56 PM EST
    LOL after escorted by the police? Nice touch that. It was to keep conflict to a minimum in Crawford. Quite necessary because of the redneck style typical of those who came to show support for the troops & the president. The state troopers gathered at our vigil here were not there because of those protesting, but those opposed who were persistent in pushing their way in. You're referencing two different happenings - one in Santa Barbara & the other in Crawford.

    This is such a clean war, ya know.
    NO such thing never has never will be. I think it was Wellington who said
    Nothing except a battle lost can be half as melancholy as a battle won.


    You're referencing two different happenings - one in Santa Barbara & the other in Crawford.
    Why yes I am. I am glad your brought that point to light, this is not an isolated incident it seems. But then her sons name was in BOTH places
    BASTIAN: Because our family had no choice in the matter. My son, Derrick, fully believed that everyone has the right to protest and express their opinion. But our family very much objects to the fact that, you know, after my son's death, that his name be used in this way. He would never have participated in any sort of an antiwar protest. And it's our understanding that there is a name on the cross -- on a cross in Crawford, Texas, as well. It came up on a Web site. My son was very much in favor of President Bush and the Bush administration, and had great respect for him as commander-in-chief. Derrick was a special escort for Mrs. Bush when she made her trip to Iraq and Afghanistan, and for the president and for the U.S. ambassador to Iraq. And it's just inappropriate not to ask the families.


    Dan, the whole point of showing the flag-draped coffins is so that there will be no more of them in the future. Let's cut to the chase, what do YOU think these kids are dying and losing their legs for?

    Posted by Kitt: "Sorry about the double post. I got some weird error posting about curbing malicious posters?!

    Posted by Kitt: "Sorry about the double post. I got some weird error posting about curbing malicious posters?!" That occurs when you accidentally double click on the post button. Haloscan flags the second posting as similar to the first, and has that warning, which applies to spamming of multiple messages all the same. Arlington West has spawned several iterations, so it's not surprising that a soldier's name is one several crosses (or whatever). And they do seem to have evolved a way for family to protest that memorialization if they so please. So what's the beef? Nothing but the sagging attempt to be outraged, while pursuing a course of genocide and lies, underequipping and undermanning the troops for undisclosed corporate purposes that is itself entirely outrageous, and in fact treasonous. As for protesting at Walter Reed, yeah, that's not really where I'd protest, but the intent is probably to protest the military which has, fairly succesfully, hidden these tragedies from the public. Hard on the families and the soldiers? Maybe -- but the person responsible is W.

    Paul, don't blame the preznit, cuz he's a uniter not a divider, after all. Dan, so what do you think of putting the "operation" names on the tombstones at Arlington w/o the approval of the families?