Questioning the Insanity Defense
by TChris
Asking mental health professionals whether a delusional woman who drowned her children knew the difference between right and wrong invites speculation.
My own belief is that no forensic psychiatrist can objectively answer the law's narrow question yes or no. There is no "truth" of the matter. Our science cannot yet map the psychotic experience of reality or measure its correspondence to the reality of the law's simplifying assumptions. The narrow right-from-wrong question may seem clear and obvious, but it is premised on assumptions that neither science nor philosophy can verify.
In a commentary published in the Psychiatric Times, Dr. Alan Stone argues that this common touchstone of the “insanity defense” asks the wrong question -- and suggests that no “right question” can easily be formulated.
< The Cost of the Iraq War Diminished Hurricane Funds | NYCLU Releases Report on Republican Nat'l Convention > |