home

Follow the Money ... to DeLay, Blunt, and Abramoff

by TChris

Roy Blunt, who took over as House majority leader for the twice-indicted Tom DeLay, turns out to be DeLay's mini-me.

Tom DeLay deliberately raised more money than he needed to throw parties at the 2000 presidential convention, then diverted some of the excess to longtime ally Roy Blunt through a series of donations that benefited both men's causes.

When the financial carousel stopped, DeLay's private charity, the consulting firm that employed DeLay's wife and the Missouri campaign of Blunt's son all ended up with money, according to campaign documents reviewed by The Associated Press.

Why is this significant?

The government's former chief election enforcement lawyer said the Blunt and DeLay transactions are similar to the Texas case and raise questions that should be investigated regarding whether donors were deceived or the true destination of their money was concealed.

"These people clearly like using middlemen for their transactions," said Lawrence Noble. "It seems to be a pattern with DeLay funneling money to different groups, at least to obscure, if not cover, the original source," said Noble, who was the Federal Election Commission's chief lawyer for 13 years, including in 2000 when the transactions occurred.

Not surprisingly, since the story involves money, the notorious Jack Abramoff enters the picture:

Much of the money -- including one donation to Blunt from an Abramoff client accused of running a "sweatshop" garment factory in the Northern Mariana Islands -- changed hands in the spring of 2000, a period of keen interest to federal prosecutors.

During that same time, Abramoff arranged for DeLay to use a concert skybox for donors and to take a golfing trip to Scotland and England that was partly underwritten by some of the lobbyist's clients. Prosecutors are investigating whether the source of some of the money was disguised, and whether some of DeLay's expenses were originally put on the lobbyist's credit card in violation of House rules.

Both DeLay and Blunt and their aides also met with Abramoff's lobbying team several times in 2000 and 2001 on the Marianas issues, according to law firm billing records obtained by AP under an open records request.

Noble said investigators should examine whether the pattern of disguising the original source of money might have been an effort to hide the leaders' simultaneous financial and legislative dealings with Abramoff and his clients.

< Judith Miller Talks to Lou Dobbs | Rumor: 22 Plame Indictments Imminent >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Follow the Money ... to DeLay, Blunt, and Abra (none / 0) (#5)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 12:52:59 PM EST
    scar-true, but money laundering is the key as it finances all the above.

    What a wicked web we weave when we yet aim to defraud. The fan is really getting clogged with it. Isn't it!

    Re: Follow the Money ... to DeLay, Blunt, and Abra (none / 0) (#2)
    by Sailor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:43 PM EST
    ED, I too see the fecal matter impacting the rotating airfoil. I hope: That the imperfect web they wove will be traced back to rove, When the intent to deceive, coupled with a greed to receive, Traces back, to be blunt, to an illegal money shunt, Then with the help of a snitch, maybe DeLay will be Bubba's new bytch;-)

    Re: Follow the Money ... to DeLay, Blunt, and Abra (none / 0) (#3)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:43 PM EST
    It seems like the Delay method of money laundering is RNC policy. Ohio's reeling in the same sort of thing. All the money ends up as illegal campaign contributions, plus a few lucrative extra commissions for the players. Randy Duke Cunningham comes to mind as well as Bob Ney. Must be a centralized system because so many examples of the same kind of laundering can not be a coincidence.

    Re: Follow the Money ... to DeLay, Blunt, and Abra (none / 0) (#4)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:43 PM EST
    Must be a centralized system because so many examples of the same kind of laundering can not be a coincidence.
    Change "laundering" with "vote fraud" or "ludicrous Halliburton no-bid contracts" or "Orwellian legislation" and you have the Coincidence Administration in a nutshell.

    Re: Follow the Money ... to DeLay, Blunt, and Abra (none / 0) (#6)
    by Sailor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:43 PM EST
    Mother of mercy, is this the end of RICO ?

    Re: Follow the Money ... to DeLay, Blunt, and Abra (none / 0) (#7)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:43 PM EST
    Sailor-No it is Mother of all Rico Indictments. (MOARI)