home

Soldier Changes Story About Murder

by TChris

It’s a familiar story: facing a stiff sentence, a defendant hopes to gain the government's favor (and “earn” a lesser penalty) by pointing the finger of blame at someone else. When there’s nobody else to blame, the desperate defendant makes something up, perhaps sensing from investigators’ questions that they have a target in mind.

Pvt. Michael Williams, convicted of murdering unarmed Iraqis, told an Army investigator that his platoon leader, 2nd Lt. Erick J. Anderson, gave him the order to kill. Now Williams says he did so only in exchange for a reduction of his life sentence to 25 years.

"I just felt that pressure of getting a life sentence instead of 25 years," Williams said. "It's just a lot of my fear."

In an effort to protect the plea bargain that had given him a sentence of 25 years in prison – he could be eligible for parole in 9 years – rather than life, Williams said he altered his story to incriminate Anderson and please prosecutors.

Williams also says he was unhappy that Anderson was unwilling to testify that he saw an intact weapon near the dead Iraqi -- testimony that would have supported Williams’ initial assertion that he was defending himself.

Williams’ statement led to murder charges against his platoon leader. But Williams recanted at Anderson’s preliminary hearing. He now says the victim was dead before Anderson arrived.

Two contradictory versions. Which is true? That’s the problem with using snitches to build a case. They’re rarely reliable, particularly when the government buys their testimony in exchange for a lesser sentence.

< There's Still Time to Stop Patriot Act Renewal | A Sign of the Times? >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Re: Soldier Changes Story About Murder (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:14 PM EST
    Or, "I was lying then, but I'm telling the truth now. No, really, I am!"