home

Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to Begin

Tomorrow's Christian Science Monitor has an excellent article on the battles that will erupt during Congressional hearings this year. The Democrats finally are about to make some noise. Alito is the only a small part of it.

Even better, with GOP moderates joining Dems on key issues, and bucking the White House over secret prisons and eavesdropping, the fights could help the Democrats re-take Congress in 2006.

Here's some of what we're in for:

GOP moderates are teaming up with Democrats to push for a second investigation by the Select Committee on Intelligence. In a Dec. 20 letter, GOP Sens. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Olympia Snowe of Maine joined Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein of California, Carl Levin of Michigan, and Ron Wyden of Oregon in calling for an "immediate inquiry" on whether the president exceeded his authority by authorizing wiretapping without a warrant.

Behind the scenes, a battle is also raging on how aggressively to push the White House on reports of secret CIA prisons abroad. Before breaking for the holidays, both the Senate and House called for the director of national intelligence to submit a classified report to the intelligence committees on secret prisons. At the 11th hour, the provision was stripped out of the FY 2006 Defense Authorization bill, with the understanding that the issue would be taken up directly by the intelligence panels.

There's more:

As Congress wound down last month, an unidentified Republican senator blocked the intelligence authorization bill that included the amendment on secret prisons. It also included an amendment by Sen. Edward Kennedy (D) of Massachusetts requiring the Bush administration to turn over prewar intelligence.

A long-stalled item on the investigative agenda is Phase II of a probe by the intelligence committee into whether the Bush administration manipulated prewar intelligence. After Democrats called the Senate into a rare secret session over this issue, insiders say the committee is now "fully engaged" on this issue, which is also expected to surface early in the new year.

The biggest investigation of all could be that involving Jack Abramoff.

In the run-up to Mr. Abramoff's expected trial date on Jan. 9, members in both parties are returning campaign contributions associated with his name. Since 1999, at least 250 members of Congress have accepted campaign funds from Abramoff or his American Indian clients, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

During Bush's first term, Congress just did his bidding. Now, it appears, our elected representatives may show some spunk. Urge them on, every chance you get.

< Bush's Latest Slam on Detainees and Torture | Bush's NSA Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Re: Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to (none / 0) (#1)
    by aw on Mon Jan 02, 2006 at 05:20:19 PM EST
    Oh, geez. I'm never going to get anything done. I can't wait for Bush to leave so I can get away from the internet more; maybe go back to reading for pleasure again.

    Re: Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to (none / 0) (#2)
    by Edger on Mon Jan 02, 2006 at 06:16:05 PM EST
    AW: I can't wait for Bush to leave so I can get away from the internet This stuff is getting addictive isn't it?

    Yes, it is. I can't wait for Abramoff to sing.

    It is getting very addictive. I never paid too much attention to politics until around 1992, now I can't stop. I'm not allowed to discuss politics anymore with the family wingnut, FIL, a man I used to have a lot of respect for. And I catch the eyerolls from the wife a lot.

    I mostly keep my mouth shut about politics. FOX News is on 24/7 at work and I live in the midst of a subdivision in Northern VA that houses families at three military bases. My closest neighbors are 1. FBI 2. CIA 3. Marines 4. Marines 5. Marines 6. Navy 7. ATF 8. A Starbucks Manager from Jersey :) If I were to fart too loud, I'd be on a watchlist.

    Re: Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to (none / 0) (#6)
    by swingvote on Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 07:23:29 AM EST
    I've got no complaint with hearings (although it would be nice if they did the parts of their job actually required by law first, for a change), but I sincerely hope that there is some small amount of substance to go with all the drama. Charles Schumer and Dick Durbin preening before the cameras isn't going to help resolve anything. Question number one should be who in the Congress was informed about the spying program and when they were informed. No more free denials from people who knew what was going on the whole time and only now find it objectionable.

    Re: Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to (none / 0) (#7)
    by Dadler on Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 07:48:01 AM EST
    justpaul, i agree, but i have to say, what makes you believe the administration was honest with ANYONE across the aisle? and the day congress really stands up and raises hell in a worthwhile manner, i'll be the first to say "well, you surprised ME." I'm not holding my breath. This process will require politicians willing to risk their positions entirely. Half-passionate attacks aren't going to cut it. It's time for all-out imaginative assault or why waste the time? Hope I'm wrong.

    Re: Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to (none / 0) (#8)
    by Lora on Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 08:00:22 AM EST
    I don't think the repubs (and their republocrat friends) will give up power just because the voters want them to.

    Re: Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to (none / 0) (#9)
    by swingvote on Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 08:02:17 AM EST
    Dadler, What makes YOU believe the administration was honest with anyone on their own side of the aisle? Fact is, it would be very strange for any administration to have done something like this without having told anyone. Which is not to say that they didn't do just that, but, problem is, they claim they did inform Congress. If so, there should be a record of it. And if there is, I would like to know who is was they informed, and what they were told. And those people should be called as the first "witnesses" and asked to testify under oath about what they knew and when they knew it. This isn't a partisan issue for me. If the administration broke the law in a way that has not be condoned in the past, they should be held accountable. If members of Congress sat by and allowed it to happen when they knew what was going on, they too should be held accountable. And if any of those now screaming [self-]righteous indignation were informed about it in advance, they should be held accountable for that as well. Not that any of this is going to happen, mind you. Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Orin Hatch, and Arlen Specter are going to get up, make some stupid remarks, the "witnesses" called will all be people those Senators have an axe to grind with, and 6 weeks, 6 months, or 6 years from now we still won't know what really happened. None of these people is serious about anything more than positioning for the next news cycle.

    Re: Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to (none / 0) (#10)
    by soccerdad on Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 08:17:33 AM EST
    JustPaul-agree with you. I have little hope of anything substantive coming out of this. Who knows maybe we'll be surprised, but I'm not holding my breath either. I do think this admin is capable of having presented an incomplete picture of what they were doing to Congress. But we'll see

    Re: Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to (none / 0) (#11)
    by Dadler on Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 10:11:49 AM EST
    I agree with both of you about the probable results of this, but i hope we're wrong. justpaul, Even if they did "inform" congress, like soccerdad I doubt instinctively (and perhaps incorrectly) that they did so in a forthright or even marginally forthright manner. Even by the crappy, biased in their favor rules we have, they still can't play by them. I mean, the ONLY reason i can figure the administration didn't RETROACTIVELY get their FISA warrants, for example, is that they were doing things they knew NO ONE besides their paranoid, power corrupted selves would understand. We can't handle the truth, that's their bottom line mentality. Keep shopping, children, we'll take care of it. Now, if there WERE any in congress who knew in full and still did nothing, well, you won't see me defending them, whatever their party affiliation. The larger point will be ignored completely. That the entire idea of a secret intelligence court is antithetical to genuine democracy and freedom.

    Re: Congressional Hearings: The Drama is About to (none / 0) (#12)
    by swingvote on Tue Jan 03, 2006 at 10:17:15 AM EST
    Dadler, I would suggest that if anyone in Congress was told about any sort of surveillance and failed to follow up on it or has since denied knowing about it, they are equally guilty. The exact details may or may not further damage the administration but they won't exxonerate those in Congress who knew.