home

Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man

“An innocent man is going to be murdered tonight. When my innocence is proven, I hope Americans will realize the injustice of the death penalty as all other civilized countries have.”
- Roger Coleman’s last words before he was executed by the state of Virginia May 20, 1992

Roger Coleman was executed in Virginia in 1992 (background here.) Today, Governor Mark Warner ordered DNA tests in his case. If Coleman is innocent, it will be the first documented case of the execution of an innocent person in the United States. The first, but probably not the only one.

This was not a sudden decision on the part of Gov. Warner. He's been sitting on the request for years. In 2003, Leonard Pitts at the Miami Herald wrote Death Penalty an Error Free Myth :

How could anyone look the other way if it was revealed that Virginia executed an innocent man? How could we do anything except finally face the immorality, unfairness and arbitrariness of capital punishment. And finally admit that it is simply wrong.

In 1984, Coleman was offered the chance to join what was ultimately a successful escape attempt. He declined because, he said, he was innocent and believed his lawyers would be able to make a court see that. To make the system work. It never happened, but to his dying day, Coleman retained his faith that the truth would someday be known. Now it can be.

Ruben Cantu, executed in Texas this year, was 17 at the time of the crime and had no prior convictions. He may be another case of wrongful execution. PBS will be featuring his case tomorrow night. [hat tip to Randy of Beautiful Horizens for the PBS link, and to several TL readers who e-mailed the AP article on Gov. Warner.]

Update: Criminal Appeal writes:

"This is a case about federalism" was the first sentence in Justice O'Conner's majority opinion in Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 (1991), a seminal case on federal habeas review of claims defaulted in state court. Invoking the two F's (federalism and finality) the Court held that Roger Keith Coleman would have no federal habeas corpus review of his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel because he had defaulted on his claims by filing his notice of appeal from the state trial court's denial of his state habeas petition one-day late.

The Court held that untimeliness was an adequate and independent ground for dismissal of the state habeas appeal. The Court also held that a procedural default in state court can be excused on federal habeas review only by a showing of cause and prejudice. Because there is no constitutional right to counsel in state habeas proceedings, state habeas counsel's late filing of the notice of appeal was not sufficient cause to excuse the default. Coleman was executed in 1992.

Yesterday, Virginia Governor Mark Warner ordered DNA testing to confirm whether Coleman raped and murdered his sister-in-law in 1981

< What Direction for Israel After Sharon? | Wal-Mart's Racist Website Error >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jan 05, 2006 at 09:46:21 PM EST
    Some things that I remember wondering about, when I was an adolescent and for the first time questioning in my mind the justness of the death penalty: if an innocent person is executed, is it murder? If not, why not? If it is murder, who is the murderer?

    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#2)
    by Peter G on Thu Jan 05, 2006 at 10:24:35 PM EST
    One of the many sickening aspects of this case is that the U.S. Supreme Court -- at the behest of Virginia authorities, of course -- denied Coleman all federal habeas corpus review. Why? Because his court-appointed lawyer had filed an earlier appeal in state court one day late. According to the Court, this error forfeited all his issues. Coleman v Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 (1991). And because it happened at a stage of the case when he was deemed to no longer have a constitutionally-guaranteed right to counsel, there was nothing that could be done about it.

    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jan 05, 2006 at 10:45:14 PM EST
    if an innocent person is executed, is it murder? If not, why not?
    If it comes out that Coleman was innocent, you can just imagine the most ardent pro-death penalty people's big dance around this issue. "Well, Coleman was convicted of rape earlier, so everyone would have thought he was guilty, and that's his own fault!" To be honest, I can't even come up with what some of their other responses may be (I'm not that evil). But don't worry, even if he's proven 110% innocent, it'll be Coleman's fault, not that of the death penalty or the criminal justice system. The best of luck to Roger Coleman in death, something he didn't have in life.

    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#4)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jan 05, 2006 at 11:02:03 PM EST
    If it comes out that Coleman was innocent, you can just imagine the most ardent pro-death penalty people's big dance around this issue.
    In a death penalty discussion I was in long ago and far away one of the death penalty advocates stated that executing the innocent was acceptable because it would still act to discourage others from committing the same crime, just as would (in his view) the execution of the guilty.

    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#5)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 03:07:08 AM EST
    I wonder if this death penalty advocate would feel the same way if it were their son\relative executed. My guess 90% of all advocates have never done prison time. Fact is death penalty, at least by lethal injection, is showing more compassion than allowing someone to live; at least in this system.

    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#6)
    by cpinva on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 03:22:37 AM EST
    was roger coleman guilty? beats me, i wasn't there, nor was i part of the jury that convicted him. that said, as a citizen of va, i would like to know, for certain, that a guilty man was executed, regardless of my feelings on the death penalty itself. the questions raised over the years, and the adamant position of the commonwealth, in diligently working to avoid analysis of evidence, for a man they were supposedly convinced committed the crime, has always bothered me. why work so hard to prevent definitive scientific analysis of evidence, that, according to you, should support your position? this never made good sense to me, never passed the "smell test", if you will. so let's, hopefully, find out, once and for all, whether va did, indeed, execute a man, for a crime he didn't commit. i am beginning to like warner more and more; not just another pretty, successful, business face in the commonwealth.

    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#7)
    by jen on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 04:22:13 AM EST
    If he is proved innocent, will anyone look for the real murderer?

    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#8)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 10:27:26 AM EST
    If he is proved innocent, and they find the real murderer, will he get to kill the guy who killed Coleman? Wouldn't be unfair if Coleman doesn't get to kill someone?

    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#9)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Jan 06, 2006 at 10:37:11 AM EST
    Aloha! I am so glad about this. I called the Govenor's office in December to request the DNA be tested. I watched Mr. Coleman on Donahue discussing his conviction. He was very convincing and I have never been able to shake the feeling that he was indeed innocent. I am glad we will finally know the truth. Aloha to all.

    punisher, if Coleman is found to be innocent, it means that the State of Virginia is a muderer. In a representative system such as ours, it also means that the people of Virginia are guilty of murder. The logic is inescapable: the death penalty must go. It is barbaric, dangerous to our national psyche, and does not provide one iota of additional security for our communities. Like lynchings in the last century, it merely serves to create murderers out of entire populations.

    BruceH: it also means that the people of Virginia are guilty of murder. The high school aged me would have wondered if that would include all Virginians, or just the one's who support the death penalty. And he would have wondered if it was just Virginians who were guilty, or all US citizens. He also would have wondered how that impacts the "eye-for-an-eye" arguement. If ten million people kill one person, do all ten million need to die? That's not really equal. If one person kills ten million people, you can only kill that guy once, and even if you make it really really painful, you can't make an even exchange.

    Re: Gov. Warner Orders DNA Test for Executed Man (none / 0) (#12)
    by Johnny on Sat Jan 07, 2006 at 11:35:27 AM EST
    Nice non-statement punisher... Any resolution if in fact, this man turns out to have been innocent? In all honesty, I feel that the state is guilty of negligent manslaughter at the least. (Should he turn out to be inocent). What recourse do we have, as a people, when the state murders people?

    Johnny: Nice non-statement punisher... I'm not sure what a non-statement is, or how I've made a nice one. Feel free to elaborate.

    Charlie: Ya talk a lot but ya don't say much. That may be what Johnny means. If it is, then I'll just disagree with him on that. And if you're suggesting that I was being sarcastic by in my last comment or two, I'll just disagree with you on that.

    If it comes out that Coleman was innocent, you can just imagine the most ardent pro-death penalty people's big dance around this issue. "Well, Coleman was convicted of rape earlier, so everyone would have thought he was guilty, and that's his own fault!" Now that Coleman was indeed found guilty -- I wonder how you and other anti-death-penalty advocates will dance around this issue. From the silence -- it looks like you've chosen to ignore it. I was working in Grundy at the time of his execution. I remember how many people came to his defense. How many arguments were made with little or no substance. Where are these people now?