home

Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves

The Katrina tape showing that President Bush and HSA Chief Michael Chertoff were warned about possible massive death tolls in New Orleans speak for themselves.

Six days of footage and transcripts obtained by The Associated Press show in excruciating detail that while federal officials anticipated the tragedy that unfolded in New Orleans and elsewhere along the Gulf Coast, they were fatally slow to realize they had not mustered enough resources to deal with the unprecedented disaster.

Bush's comment when being told of the likelihood of massive deaths: "We are fully prepared."

As for the "fog of war" defense:

Homeland Security officials have said the "fog of war" blinded them early on to the magnitude of the disaster. But the video and transcripts show federal and local officials discussed threats clearly, reviewed long-made plans and understood Katrina would wreak devastation of historic proportions. "I'm sure it will be the top 10 or 15 when all is said and done,"

Crooks and Liars has some video and a round-up of blogger reactions.

< Vietnam Commutes Australian's Death Sentence | Guantanamo Tribunals: What's Torture? >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#1)
    by desertswine on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 10:38:23 AM EST
    "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees."
    The rotting stench of the Bush Administration continues to befoul the air. Never has such a small man tried to fill such large shoes. He's got to be the worst-president-ever and a continuing insult.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#2)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 12:40:00 PM EST
    et al - What happened to the "massive death numbers?" As phony as the murders, rapes, etc., that didn't happen in the 'dome? This is just another "We hate Bush and want to get him" story.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 12:57:51 PM EST
    Gee, Jim. Are you disappointed that there weren't more deaths? Ya sound like a kid on Christmas who didn't get his favorite toy and had to settle for a snow shovel and a lump of coal when recounting the lack of murders, rapes, etc in the dome. Gee, I thought you'd be happy about the conference call tape surfacing. It sort of vindicates your boy. Compared to shrub and chertoff, brownie really was doin' a heck of a job.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#4)
    by TomStewart on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 01:22:34 PM EST
    Sorry Jim, but you have to admit Bush lied about not knowing the levees could be breached. He was told more than once, and he either wasn't lisening, or didn't care. Lately his defense to almost everything has been 'I didn't know', but it is clear that even when he is told, he still 'didn't know'. Is it that hard to remain engaded and interested in the safety of the very people you pledged to protect?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#5)
    by jondee on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 01:24:25 PM EST
    The hurricane proves that God is just another BHAW. Of course thats just a supposition.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#6)
    by Che's Lounge on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 01:33:15 PM EST
    What happened to the "massive death numbers?" 1300 dead 2300 missing More than WTC Massive enough for you?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#7)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 01:47:42 PM EST
    charliedontsurf1 - My mission in life is but to provide you with some things to think about. One of them is that the press was speaking of massive deaths, and that didn't happen. And if anyone was disappointed I would guess it would all those who were proven wrong. And yes, Brown looks pretty good. So does Bush if you ignore all the dumb comments like, "Why didn't he ask questions?" Why should he? The team was in place. charlie, you may never understand this, but sometimes you just have to let the team play. Check this out.
    MYTH: "The aftermath of Katrina will go down as one of the worst abandonments of Americans on American soil ever in U.S. history."--Aaron Broussard, president, Jefferson Parish, La., Meet the Press, NBC, Sept. 4, 2005 REALITY: Bumbling by top disaster-management officials fueled a perception of general inaction, one that was compounded by impassioned news anchors. In fact, the response to Hurricane Katrina was by far the largest--and fastest-rescue effort in U.S. history, with nearly 100,000 emergency personnel arriving on the scene within three days of the storm's landfall.
    charlie, did you ever think about the difficulty of moving huge amounts of equipment and men over roads that were blocked? Did you ever think about the problems of moving all that equipment through an area that didn't have gasoline and disel fuel available? And which bridges could handle the big pieces of machinery and which couldn't? And this?
    ...reporting that the Red Cross "had prepositioned water, food, blankets and hygiene products for delivery to the Superdome and the Convention Center in the immediate aftermath of the hurricane, but were blocked from delivering those supplies by orders of the Louisiana state government, which did not want to attract people to the Superdome and/or Convention Center."


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#8)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 01:49:21 PM EST
    Che - 1300 dead is not massive. You know it. I know it. Try another talking point.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#9)
    by jondee on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 01:55:57 PM EST
    Did you forget about the 2,300 (low estimate) still missing? Beyond the temp that water boils at, theres little that you "know" that others at this site know.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#10)
    by Slado on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 01:59:29 PM EST
    This is another media driven news story created to slam Bush. That my fellow conservatives even bother to get worked up about this amazes me. Equally amazing that liberals some how see this as justification for blaming natural disasters and systemic government failures on one person who they can't beat in elections. Bush was warned that the levees could be overwhelemed if NO took a direct hit. What happened is the hurricane didn't hit NO directly and eveyrone thought the levees would hold. They did for most of the first day and then because they were not as strong and everyone thought they broke. Ooops. So was Bush warned that "Mr. President, we think that NO will not take a direct hit but only be glanced by the Hurricane. Then it will be fine for the first few hours or so, we will assume that NO has survived, but then the leves will actually break because certain levees are not as strong as we think they are becaue they were never built properly." That's not what he was warned about. This is as lame as the memo about planes and buildings. So be it. Bush is a big boy he can take it.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#11)
    by squeaky on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 02:20:21 PM EST
    ppj-
    Che - 1300 dead is not massive.
    What would you call it then? I know the Stalin quote so I hope that is not your reasoning. Also Balcks were considered 1/6 human at one point so I hope that is not your reasoning either. Most of them were Dems. Am I getting warmer?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#12)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 03:04:42 PM EST
    Squeaky - The media was talking about thousands being dead. Some were even saying 10,000, etc., etc. That would be massive. 1300 is bad. 1300 is too many. But it isn't "massive." For example.
    New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin has warned "it wouldn't be unreasonable to have 10,000" dead in the city, and most of them will end up here.
    jondee - Who knows? Let's say that since the 2300 number was published, 500 have turned up. 800 have decided to just stay vanished.. get out from under debts, court orders, sentenced but not served jail time, child support, etc. That leaves 1000 we'll say have "vanished." Dead? Some. How many? I don't know. You don't know. Squeaky wrote:
    Also Balcks were considered 1/6 human at one point so I hope that is not your reasoning either
    That is a very nasty slur. But then you did write:
    Posted by Squeaky at September 19, 2005 11:19 PM Rove never needed proof for his smear machine, why should I.


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#13)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 03:07:24 PM EST
    yeah, what's 1300? Pffffffft. wait til we get to the 2300 of Iraq. Then PP may have a pang of guilt. That's much more than his hero will have.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#15)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 03:36:23 PM EST
    PPj's flip attitude is classic for wingnuts. Life is cheap for them as long as it's some one elses life. Because some said it could have been 10,000 in no way make 1,300 a pittance. I'll bet PPj would only consider it massive if it was his life that was that at stake. That may be the only time we agree! LOL

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#16)
    by Johnny on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 03:56:36 PM EST
    Jondee, you beat me to it. I might add that Jim, to his credit, said 1300 was "too many". But then followed up insinuating that over 33% of the "missing" were maybe ducking obligations... Nice. Jim, to pull one of your favorite tricks out, got any links to back up your assertions?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#17)
    by jondee on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 03:58:54 PM EST
    The latest Aryan Nations newsletter covers the whole thing.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#18)
    by Lww on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 04:29:12 PM EST
    Agree with slado. This thing started cookin' before the hurricane made landfall. This was a century storm and no matter what Bush did it would've been an unprecedented disaster. God forbid, the BIG ONE hits S Cal, I don't care who's President, it'll be ugly. For the liberals/dems it's a win/win, they care about the victims and everyone else doesn't. Count on the "idiots" to digest it your way.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#19)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 05:25:10 PM EST
    Submitted for your approval. It was just another Bush-Bashing conspiracy. This time by the mostly-black, ungrateful people of the 9th Ward of New Orleans to go and get themselves killed in an effort just to make a popular president look bad and to force a republican congress and a republican white house to undertake and issue reports critical of their own actions and efforts in the run up to and in the wake of Katrina, thereby drowning out a positive article about the Federal response in that well-respected Bible of Public Affairs, Popular Mechanics. Yes, that's right, you guessed it, you've just stepped into the ... twilight zone.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#21)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 05:56:24 PM EST
    Actually, Jim, I've thought quite a bit about how much quicker and more efficient a State and local response could've been in NOLA if the LANG and the NOPD hadn't had so many of their numbers in Iraq. They're the National Guard. The United States being the nation in question. Then, there's the matter of their equipment. Specifically, their HIGH WATER EQUIPMENT being in Iraq when it should be at home where it really would've come in handy. Yet another shrub disaster visited upon his people. Then there's the simple fact that the putz and the reptilian congress has cut funding for the levee construction and maintenance budget every year he's been on the throne. Inspection and enforcement is lax to non-existent as it is with the mines and we've seen the fruits of those labors as well now, haven't we? All in all, quite a harvest for the culture of corruption that is this administration and congress.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#22)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 06:04:14 PM EST
    This was a century storm and no matter what Bush did it would've been an unprecedented disaster.
    Oh, the poor dear. Those people have got a lot of nerve dyin' and makin' king george look bad. After all, shrub's image is the most important thing. Storm of the Century or not, there's no situation that this idiot can't make worse. He's certainly proved that.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#23)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 06:06:51 PM EST
    Ed Beckman - Evidently you can't read, but you can insult. I wrote:
    Squeaky - The media was talking about thousands being dead. Some were even saying 10,000, etc., etc. That would be massive. 1300 is bad. 1300 is too many. But it isn't "massive."
    I hope that concept isn't too hard for you to understand. But let me try again. 1300 is bad. Cancer is bad. Airplane crashes are bad. 10,000 when compared to 1300 is MASSIVE. You know, like much bigger. And in this case, it was wrong. And that is the point. The media and the local politicans didn't have a clue when they kept talking about MASSIVE number of deaths. Johnny - Nope, just common sense. i.e. All that are "missing" aren't missing. It is very common for some people to skip when they have a chance to get out from under. Most come back, sooner or later. Speak to your local police department. jondee - Why do you bring race into this? There is absolutely no reference to race in my comments. Shame on you for your loss of control and your attempt to stereotype people. Johnny - And shame on you for agreeing with him. Neither of you want to debate the point, but I'll try again. You have what, 400,000 poeple evacuated? And after all is said and done, 2300 are unaccounted for? Have you even thought about what a small number that is? .00575% And have you thought about this? How many bodies have been recovered that weren't in the original count? It has been five months.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#24)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 06:13:51 PM EST
    charliedontsurf1 writes:
    Specifically, their HIGH WATER EQUIPMENT being in Iraq when it should be at home where it really would've come in handy
    Charlie, best I can tell that is incorrect. Of course I will give you the point if you can link to some proof. That also goes to the NOPD bit and the NG. BTW - Did you ever think about why they would have HIGH water equipment, whatever that is, in a desert?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#25)
    by jen on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 06:25:23 PM EST
    so, President Bush can lie about anything. And much like muggles passing the Leaky Cauldron, his true believers wont notice. They will go on and on about death rates and whatnot.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#20)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 06:27:44 PM EST
    deleted

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#14)
    by jondee on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 06:29:27 PM EST
    deleted, commenter warned.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#26)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 06:46:39 PM EST
    Jen - What lie did he tell? You are losing the debate in the voter's view by making false claims. BTW - Go back and watch the video and read a bit. The discussions were about overtopping and breaching. That is two distinct actions. Let me help you. If a levee is breached, it has been opened. It must be repaired before it can function again as a levee. i.e. It has a gaping hole. A large gap, etc. If a levee is overtopped, the water level has become higher than the levee and will run over. Now that isn't good, but a well designed levee can be overtopped and function just fine when the water level goes down. Link

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#27)
    by jondee on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 06:50:10 PM EST
    ppj - Shame on you for coming here and expecting to find the same cognitvly impaired demograph that supports your favorite outlets. Of course you werent proffering stereotypes when you speculated that the missing were fleeing child support, debts, and jail sentences. Youre almost becoming laughable.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#28)
    by jondee on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 06:55:38 PM EST
    75% dem 25% rep is allowed to stand though. Lie your a** off, just dont name call. That'll increase the sites credibility.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#29)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 07:50:38 PM EST
    Let's just say Jim uses the truth sparingly. He's only got the one shred left and he plans on outliving Methuselah by a wide margin so he's gotta make it last.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#30)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 07:56:12 PM EST
    jondee - I don't make the rules, but I do try to follow them. And I have had comments deleted when I broke them. But I have never made such a vulgar, despicable attack as you just did. If you choose to see everything as race related that is your right. I don't. And that is my right. Surely you undersatnd that your attack made everyone look bad. I do not expect to be loved by you, or anyone else. As a social liberal I understand that in today's political climate it is not easy to stand alone. The Right bothers me that they might give up our rights too easily and the Left bothers me that they seem to think everyone has rights but no responsibility. As I have said before, I find both of you on the opposite sides of the same coin.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#31)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 07:59:29 PM EST
    charliedontsurf1 - I again invite you to provide proof of any errors in my arguments. Of course to do so you will need to learn how to link rather than just play to the crowd.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#32)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 08:11:20 PM EST
    Jim, I'm still workin' on why they lied about wmd and invaded Iraq in the first place let alone why they took LANG's Highwater equipment to Iraq. It makes as much sense as anything else they've done. We work on the big insanity before we get to the smaller insanity around here. Feel free to prove me wrong. Knock yourself out. Tell me shrub's not at 34 percent, he's at 38 percent. By all means, make yourself happy. He's been hated abroad since day one of his reign of error. He still is. Things have gotten so bad for him here at home now that he goes abroad to get away. Just like he did when he went to Argentina after Katrina. The clown that'd never even been to Canada before he was President suddenly can't wait to get back to the Steppes of Outer Mongolia to hang with the Ghost of Genghis Kahn.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#33)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 08:12:41 PM EST
    charliedontsurf1 - You were talking about high wheel vehicles not being available because of the equipment being in Iraq. A funny thing happened on my to Google:
    More than 3,600 were on duty in Louisiana, primed to support civilian authorities with aviation assets, with security personnel to police and sheriffs departments, and with engineer equipment including high-wheeled vehicles that could plow through flood waters to rescue stranded victims.
    And if you like that one, you'll love this one:
    Even though National Guard forces have been heavily engaged in the Global War on Terrorism, nearly 124,000 troops were available for duty in the 17 states along the storm's projected path, the National Guard Bureau reported. That averages to 78 percent of those states' total Guard strength. Another 6,000 were available in Texas, and a Guard spokesman pointed out that tens of thousands more could be drawn from the rest of the nation.
    Link

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#34)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 08:25:42 PM EST
    The federal government failed in their response to Katrina. Period. We all saw this to be true. Bush is the head of the government thus he failed. He said on the tape that the government was ready to jump in immediately. We saw that it did not. Jim, can spin all he wants, but the nation SAW what happened. Big deal if the authorities and the press lamented that there might be massive deaths because of Katrina. They really thought there might be. It was a huge storm. During the 9/11 attack, the mayor and others lamented that there might be tens of thousand deaths, because they really thought there might be. Good grief in both cases they were making educated guesses. I could debate more on this subject, but I don't feel it is necessary. Look around our country and the world folks. Bush is such a failure that his supporters have absolutely no credibility.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#35)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 08:48:28 PM EST
    Jim, you seem to be still operating under the delusion that you've established some sort of credentials for having a clue as to what you're talking about. You really should see someone about that. You couldn't be further from the truth. Your arguments - such as they are - are wholly without merit factually and legally and totally lacking in foundation. You assume that everyone should just take your word for the validity of your assertions but insist that anyone and everyone provide links when challenging your ludicrous contentions. On the rare occasions when you do provide a link to bolster your "argument", it's invariably something ridiculous like tonights special from Popular Mechanics about the "rapid federal response to Katrina" which only serves to make shrub look more pathetic in the face of the conference call video that exposes yet again for the incompetent liar he is in addition to the two republican reports just released that totally contradict the findings of that article which everyone knows is total nonsense. If it's not Popular Mechanics, it's right wing news or faux or some other wingnut nonsense with no credibility whatsoever. If it's not that, you constantly refer someone to the archives to read your self-described learned opinion on some other issue that's supposed to establish your bona fides as an independent thinking, non-republican. It's laughable. You're a knee-jerk bush leaguer. I don't know who you think you're kiddin'. No matter what the guy does, you're gonna support him. He could turn port security over to saddam as a condition of his parole/community service and you'd be tellin' us how brilliant an idea it was. Nevertheless, the fact that you find the war on drugs as presently conducted an absurd waste of time, lives, money and an abject failure does not automatically bestow credibility upon you with respect to shrub's Iraq strategy. It just means you're havin' a broken clock moment.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#36)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 09:12:08 PM EST
    Jim, explain to me why the republican written congressional and white house reports are so critical of the federal effort? I didn't say all the LANG was in Iraq did I? I didn't say that all the LANG EQUIPMENT was in Iraq did I? That's what I thought. There was enough in both instances so it had an adverse effect. I'm sure that was true In Mississippi. Vermont lost another Green Mountain Boy Yesterday. A 32 year-old with a wife and 4 kids. RPG hit his Humvee. At least he died instantly. And for what? A lie. At one point, we'd lost more per capita than any State in the Union. Just like in the Civil War. I'm not sure if that's still true, but it was. Now they get to do it in their Civil War. Gee, thanks, shrub. There was a guy from the NHNG in the same vehicle. A 32 year-old. Severe head injury. Flown to Wiesbaden then Walter Reed. ICU. He's the Police Chief of a small town on the border. At least he was. Chalk up another one for shrub.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#37)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 06:25:42 AM EST
    debbiehamil - No, the nation did not see what happened. They saw what was on TV. And that included the Mayor of NO saying that 10,000 dead was expected, reporters saying that the water pollution was so bad the area could be uninhabitable for years, reports of multiple murders and rapes within the Superdome, including the rape/murder of a child. That these things did not happen seem to have escaped your notice. Repeat after me. "FEMA is not a first responder." That is a fact. It was not designed to be one. Despite what you may think, there is no spaceship circling the earth ready to beam down tons of equipment and thousands of men at the touch of a button. The first response teams must be local people. And that includes the local officials, especially mayors and governors making prompt and accurate decisions. Is there room for approval? Of course. No one said there wasn't. But like it or not, the Feds set a record getting to Katrina. And if you want to hold Bush responsible, then you are going to have to make him King. That way when he sees things going bad, he can just take over. That way mobile hospitals won't be stopped at the border. Link And perhaps, as King, Bush won't wait until less than 24 hours before the hurricane hits to issue orders for the evacuation of 400,000 plus people.
    New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin declared a state of emergency Sunday and ordered a mandatory evacuation of the city
    Link Do you think maybe that contributed to the problem? BTW - The mayor has since admitted to dithering because he was fearful that if he moved quickly and the hurricane didn't do bog damage the city would be liable for lost tourist spending. Wow. Can you imagine? Where's the outrage, debbiehamil? And do you remember those yellow busses, the ones parked in the flooded parking lots? You know, the more than 600 that could have taken people to safety? Think maybe His Honor screwed up? No! Heavens No! The evil and vile BUSH should have been up there on Air Force One, calling down: "Attention! Attention! This is your President! Would someone please start using those school busses to get people out of the city? Anyone. Please. Yes. Anyplace where they don't drown. Try I 10 West. Yeah you'll be doing the same thing that high school kid figured out and did on his own. Sure. It'll be okay." debbie, in this matter your reactions are like anyone on the Left.. You have a huge amount of bias, perhaps even hatred, for Bush. So you seize upon anything to blame him for, and once you hear something bad, you cease thinking and don't move forward. It doesn't help that the press and many bloggers, don't understand the role of FEMA, and don't have a great deal of technical knowledge. But that they don't take the time to understand the difference between "overtopping and breaching" demonstrates a lack of concern for the facts.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#38)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 06:55:45 AM EST
    chaliedontsurf1 - Never uses a link and complains about mine. And yes charley, I use lots of'em. charliedontsurf1 - Comments about lack of equipment in LA during Katrina due to Iraqi NG deployment and when shown the facts with a quote and a link suddenly starts parsing and claiming he didn't say that. charliedontsurf1 - Has been around for maybe 5 months yet wants to talk about credentials. BTW - Archives are useful for proving what someone said. charliedontsurf1 - I have posted numerous times my political stand. I support a social liberal agenda and a strong national defense. Yes charlie, at one time Demos were for defense. (To all of you too young to know that I apologize for bursting your bubble.) charliedontsurf1 - I again invite you to provide proof of any errors in my arguments. Of course to do so you will need to learn how to link rather than just play to the crowd. But be careful. They cheer when you're on the way up and when you're on the way down.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#39)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 06:58:25 AM EST
    Jim, the world did see what happened. Even Fox showed it. We saw what was needed to respond to Katrina. It took more than 600 buses to respond, more than "first responders", and more than state or local governments. It took the force of the US military and the US government. When the "first responders" are unable to respond because of an overwhelming disaster, then FEMA needs to.
    Jim, according to your man on the tape that was released, the government was ready to "first respond". They did not.
    Your squealing about "fears" that didn't develop - I'm glad they didn't. The storm was huge and people naturally were afraid that horrible things may happen, and they voiced their fears. During the 9/11 attack, the mayor and others lamented that there might be tens of thousand deaths, because they really thought there might be. Good grief in both cases they were making educated guesses. Look at the space your spin took up. What a waste because you have zero credibility. You have bowed down to Bush and you refuse to get up no matter what you see or hear.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#40)
    by jen on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 07:56:42 AM EST
    the mayor failed the governor failed the federal government failed What part of this means George Bush is blameless? What part of this means he should have told us "no one could have forseen the breach of the levees" or any of the other reasuring stuff about the devastating storms that destroyed lives,towns and evenone city in Alabama, Louisiana, Missisipi, and Texas? oh right, I forgot, that depends on what my definition of is is

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#41)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:23:11 AM EST
    debbie - You still don't grasp reality. Remember. There aren't any spaceships circling the earth ready to beam equipment and people to the ground. And since the hurricane will destroy most of what you might preposition, you have to hang back until it has passed and then you deploy. And deploying takes time. So, no matter what anyone tells you, debbie, the first responders must be local people. So Bush said we would be there after the hurricane hit. And FEMA was. It was there faster than ever before. In fact, naval ships off the cost were flying rescue missions the day the hurricane hit. Was there confusion? Yes. Could there have been better coordination? Yes. Should these be fixed? Yes. But quit thinking that the feds can ever be there immediately. Can't happen. It is up to the locals for that. And the locals, at the top, were mostly inept. .

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#42)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:31:41 AM EST
    I have a good grasp of reality. You on the other hand are blinded by the false glow of Bush's "halo".

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#44)
    by desertswine on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:07:14 AM EST
    Remember. There aren't any spaceships circling the earth ready to beam equipment and people to the ground.
    Is there a prize for pinhead statement of the day?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#45)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:35:32 AM EST
    desertswine - Are you volunteering? My comment stands. You can't preposition, so you have to wait until after the hurricance has gone through before you deploy. Dark Avenger - "We?" Do you have a mouse in your pocket. debbiehamil - If you do, why do you continue to act like you think can move millions of pounds of equipment, hundreds of tons of supplies and thousands of people hundreds of miles at the snap of someone's fingers? Oh, did I fail to mention all of this must be done over damaged roads, with no power, no local gas and while the remmants of the hurricane are still pounding you?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#46)
    by squeaky on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:50:28 AM EST
    ppj-
    Dark Avenger - "We?" Do you have a mouse in your pocket.
    Nice attempt to 'divide and conquor', perhaps you forgot what site you were commenting on. Yes Dark Avenger can feel comfortable to use the word "we" especially when it comes to using your pal Rove's name in vain.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#47)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:53:07 AM EST
    Jim, we have a strong and great military and the reality is they did move quickly upon getting the go from Bush. You expected the locals to respond "in a snap" under the conditions you described, but I guess you think our military is weaker than the locals. Why do you hate our troops?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#48)
    by Slado on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:54:15 AM EST
    Jen is right in her assesment of blame. Everyone did a bad job. Bush deserves blame but not for lying. He didn't lie. No one thought the levees would break if NO didn't take a direct hit. They didn't. That's a fact. The tape talks about "overtoping". The president gets an F for not thinking outside the box, cutting throught the red tape, not responding with Bill Clinton like understanding till days later, not realizing he had a mess on his hands etc... But to say he should have known is dishonest and a cheap shot. How can you disagree with that?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#49)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 10:04:23 AM EST
    No. There's no sex but there's plenty of lies and video tape. Shrub lied his tail off. He comes off more incompetent than Brownie. Chertoff is a complete waste of oxygen. They lied. It's all there for everyone to see. There's no getting around it. He is unquestionably, the worst President in US History and I'm sure he'll top it next week.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#50)
    by Sailor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 10:13:37 AM EST
    In recent years, Bush repeatedly sought to slice the Army Corps of Engineers' funding requests to improve the levees holding back Lake Pontchartrain, which Katrina smashed through, flooding New Orleans. In 2005, Bush asked for $3.9 million, a small fraction of the request the corps made in internal administration deliberations. Under pressure from Congress, Bush ultimately agreed to spend $5.7 million. [...] "Flood control has been a priority of this administration from Day One," said White House press secretary Scott McClellan [...] The project, which is supposed to cost $744 million overall, has been shortchanged recently, according to advocates. The corps said it needed $62.5 million next fiscal year; Bush proposed $10.5 million. This provoked howls of protest from the Louisiana congressional delegation. "All of us said, 'Look, build it or you're going to have all of Jefferson Parish under water,' " recalled former senator John Breaux, a Democrat who is a Bush ally. "And they didn't, and now all of Jefferson Parish is under water."


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#51)
    by Sailor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 10:17:12 AM EST
    As levees burst and floods continued to spread across areas hit by Hurricane Katrina yesterday, a former chief of the Army Corps of Engineers disparaged senior White House officials for "not understanding" that key elements of the region's infrastructure needed repair and rebuilding. [...] I said, 'Mitch, it doesn't matter if a terrorist blows the lock up or if it falls down because it disintegrates -- either way it's the same effect, and if we let it fall down, we have only ourselves to blame.' It made no impact on him whatsoever." [...] Parker -- who, along with members of his family, was forced to evacuate his Mississippi farm on Sunday night -- drew media attention (and the White House's ire) in 2002 by telling the Senate Budget Committee that a White House proposal to cut just over $2 billion from the Corps' $6 billion budget request would have a "negative impact" on the national interest. Parker also noted that cuts would mean the end of scores of contracts and the loss of tens of thousands of jobs. After Parker's Capitol Hill appearance, Daniels wrote an angry memo to President Bush, writing that Parker's testimony "reads badly. . . on the printed page," and that "Parker. . . [was] distancing [himself] actively from the administration." Parker, a former Republican congressman from Mississippi, was forced to resign shortly thereafter.


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#52)
    by Sailor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 10:23:41 AM EST
    September 22, 2004: The Times-Picayune reported that a pilot study on raising the height of the levees surrounding New Orleans had been completed and generated enough information for a second study necessary to estimate the cost of doing so. The Bush administration "ordered the New Orleans district office" of the Army Corps of Engineers "not to begin any new studies, and the 2005 budget no longer includes the needed money." [...] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) report from before September 11, 2001 detailed the three most likely catastrophic disasters that could happen in the United States: a terrorist attack in New York, a strong earthquake in San Francisco, and a hurricane strike in New Orleans. In 2002, New Orleans officials held the simulation of what would happen in a category 5 storm. Walter Maestri, the emergency coordinator of Jefferson Parish in New Orleans , recounted the outcome to PBS' NOW With Bill Moyers: Maestri, September 2002: Well, when the exercise was completed it was evidence that we were going to lose a lot of people. We changed the name of the [simulated] storm from Delaney to K-Y-A-G-B... kiss your ass goodbye... because anybody who was here as that category five storm came across... was gone.


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#53)
    by squeaky on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 10:31:49 AM EST
    He is even lying about his Philly Cheesesteak preferences. While previously making a national story about Kerry's traitorous preference for swiss cheese on his philly sandwich he endears himself with Cheesesteak lovers in PA by outright lying. Truth be told: He substitutes American Cheese for the standard Cheeze Wiz. Little things that do not matter, you say? Well they do matter as they show that lying is routine and endemic for our dear leader. fdl gets it right:
    Why lie? Because he could. He and Karl and their malignant spin crew thought no one in the media would do any follow-up, that they'd move right on to the next spin cycle and never bother to look in the bottom of the washer for that one lost sock.


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#54)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 10:52:56 AM EST
    Jim, once again, I don't care what your position on the war on drugs is or whether you like chocolate chip cookies, drink your coffee black or if you're partial to Muddy Waters and Howlin' Wolf and that you know who Hubert Sumlin is. I think I've heard the story about you sitting next to Jimmy Carter on a plane more often than the fact that Jerome Bettis is from Detroit. I'm not interested in your opinions on the merits of canned hunts. Truthfully, I can conceive of no commodity that could interest me less. None of it gives you any credibility on this or any other topic that's come up 'round these parts in my eyes. None. Zip. Nada. Bupkis. Then there's the matter of your bogus links. Frequent or infrequent. That ain't helpin' your cause either. Once again, a republican congressional committee report and the white house's own report contradicts your account of the Federal response. They couldn't whitewash it any more than that 'cause everyone can see that they lied and screwed up they're continuing to lie and screw up so they're just gonna try to minimize the degree. The heady days of "it's been pretty well confirmed that Saddam had direct links to 9/11" and other rovesputin horsebrit being swallowed hook, line and sinker by anyone but the kool-aid swillers are over. I don't do requests and I've got my sheepskin so I don't do homework anymore. Certainly, not for the likes of you. Turn up some wmd and I'll start turnin' up some links. The offer still stands. Feel free to prove me wrong. You're the one who's sittin' at 34 and 18 percent, pal, not me.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#55)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 11:58:31 AM EST
    et al.... Sorry Jim, but you have to admit Bush lied about not knowing the levees could be breached. What's the favorite sentence libs love to throw out there...."Bush lied" Yeah, yeah,...blah, blah, blah.... If you look at those tapes carefully (something none of the liberal bush hating news media did), you'll see very plainly that they discussed the levees being "topped". (IE - water rising above them and thus flowing over) which would bring flood damage to the surrounding area. They did NOT discuss the levees being "breeched", ( IE - breaking open) allowing much more water in and causing far MORE devastation. But, libs aren't concerned with FACTS... just any old excuse to bash GW is at the top of their agenda. Let's let all the local f-ups slide and nail the Feds...it's ALL their fault. Never mind most of them ignored the order to evacuate.. (GW should have seen to all that in person)... Never mind the Mayor left hundreds of buses that could have been used for that, drown (GW should have driven them) .. Never mind the levees (that where never strengthened under years of Dem rule in that state) failed... (GW should have 'made sure' they were strong enough)... Right? C'mon... you all believe that's right! Every intel agency (and most of the Dem party) KNEW Saddam had WMD's.. but ... we'll all ignore that minor little factual detail and just keep yelling "Bush lied".... Quick now.... all of you plug your eyes and scream nah . nah.. nah .... So you won't have top hear the facts! That way you can still scream "bush lied" for any & all things that go wrong in your little 'one sided' worlds!

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#56)
    by Slado on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 12:17:32 PM EST
    Now what? Blanco tells Bush levees just fine So Bush directly asks Blanco post storm if the levees have broken. Blanco (given free pass by TL) says no. Once again the first part of the story bashes Bush, left goes hog wild, then the facts come out and the left has moved onto another issue. However 6months from now I'll read in posts and comments "Bush knew about the levees". The great thing about left wing talking points is that they don't have to be checked vs. facts because in the lefts opinion they just have to be repeated enough to become true.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#57)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 12:38:38 PM EST
    Ah, the shrub shills are parsin' prodigiously today. "He said topped. He never said breached. Who listens to weather reports?" A legitimate, competent President would have legitimate, competent people in position with worst case scenario contingency plans and the authority to proceed accordingly. We just got the worst case scenario president with the worst case scenario team. That's why six months later, it looks like less than six weeks later. Is the Levee System a Federal, State or Local Responsibility? That's what I thought. Have the republicans cut funding for construction and maintenance for the levee system every year since they've been in power? That's what I thought. Has the great pretender cut funding every year since he's been on the throne. It's so depressing, let's change the subject. Let's talk about Iraq or who won the coin toss to manage our ports or who shooter shot in the face today. Oh, I mean yesterday.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#58)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 02:53:02 PM EST
    chaliedontsurf1
    Is the Levee System a Federal, State or Local Responsibility?
    Let me answer you this way. There are calls for investigation of the New Orleans levee board. And actually Bush asked for $20M more than the House wanted to give. Of course the real question becomes this. If you live in an area that is below sea level, and has been flooded before, maybe you should tax yourselves for protection rather than asking Aunt Matilda in Denver to pay for it. BTW - Let me repeat Slado's comment. And he actually used a link to prove it. See how useful the linkie thingie is?
    So Bush directly asks Blanco post storm if the levees have broken. Blanco (given free pass by TL) says no.
    You protest too much. Provide us some links, charlie. Don't let the moon(bats) get in your eyes. And I love your last comment.
    ... and I've got my sheepskin so I don't do homework anymore.
    Shorter. "We don't need no ed u cation..." That pretty well sums it up. Squeaky writes:
    Yes Dark Avenger can feel comfortable to use the word "we" ....
    I am sure he feels blessed to receive your approval for his actions. Do you also mentor his other actions? How sweet.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#59)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 03:11:34 PM EST
    charliedontsurf1 - You were opining about the levees and who controls what:
    Concern about corruption in Louisiana is seen as one reason behind Washington's reluctance to hand over more money to rebuild after Hurricane Katrina. Under the new levee proposal, which residents will consider in a statewide September referendum, there will be two boards on the east and west banks of the Mississippi River with common engineering and ethical rules.
    Took me under 60 seconds to find the above. Link

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#60)
    by Sailor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 05:30:36 PM EST
    Speaking to "Larry King Live" on August 31, in the wake of Katrina, Brown said, "That Category 4 hurricane caused the same kind of damage that we anticipated. So we planned for it two years ago. Last year, we exercised it. And unfortunately this year, we're implementing it." Brown suggested FEMA -- part of the Department of Homeland Security -- was carrying out a prepared plan, rather than having to suddenly create a new one. Chertoff argued that authorities actually had assumed that "there would be overflow from the levee, maybe a small break in the levee. The collapse of a significant portion of the levee leading to the very fast flooding of the city was not envisioned."
    In July 2004, more than 40 federal, state, local and volunteer organizations practiced this very scenario in a five-day simulation code-named "Hurricane Pam", where they had to deal with an imaginary storm that destroyed over half a million buildings in New Orleans and forced the evacuation of a million residents. At the end of the exercise Ron Castleman, regional director for the Federal Emergency Management Agency declared: "We made great progress this week in our preparedness efforts. "Disaster response teams developed action plans in critical areas such as search and rescue, medical care, sheltering, temporary housing, school restoration and debris management. These plans are essential for quick response to a hurricane but will also help in other emergencies," he said. In light of that, said disaster expert Bill Waugh of Georgia State University, "It's inexplicable how unprepared for the flooding they were." He said a slow decline over several years in funding for emergency management was partly to blame.


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#61)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 06:35:15 PM EST
    Gee, This is swell Jim. I almost hate to break it to ya that the River Levees had nothin' to do with the flooding. It was the Lake and the Industrial Canal on the other side of the City. You can look it up. So, it took ya under 60 seconds to find the wrong answer, eh? How'd that work out for ya in school? That's what I thought. You've got some erasers to clap, young man. What do the words FEDERAL FUNDS signify to you? How about the ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS? Does that sound like some Hunter's Rest Tavern Softball Team or Neighborhood Watch to you? That's what I thought. Wash those blackboards while you're at it.
    Took me under 60 seconds to find the above. Reforms, funds seen lifting New Orleans recovery 18 Feb 2006 01:28:10 GMT Source: Reuters By Stuart Grudgings BATON ROUGE, Feb 17 (Reuters) - An expected $4.2 billion in new federal funds and a state agreement to reform New Orleans' levee system have raised hopes for the city's recovery after Hurricane Katrina, Louisiana lawmakers said on


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#62)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 07:00:51 PM EST
    charlie - Hate to tell you this, but they are all part of the same system. How about local contracts let by the engineers per local dictates?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#63)
    by Sailor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 07:38:18 PM EST
    After AP's broadcast this week showing some of the Katrina briefings, the Homeland Security Department refused Thursday to release videos from five other days immediately before and after Katrina hit. The agency insisted last year _ in response to AP's requests under the Freedom of Information Act _ there were no such tapes. Now it acknowledges more tapes exist.


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#64)
    by Sailor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 07:56:38 PM EST
    Let me answer you this way.
    Read: I am about to lie.
    Bush asked for $20M more than the House wanted to give.
    Read: There, you see, I just lied ... again. Because, as posted above, and over and over on other threads "In 2005, Bush asked for $3.9 million, a small fraction of the request the corps made in internal administration deliberations. Under pressure from Congress, Bush ultimately agreed to spend $5.7 million." and "The corps said it needed $62.5 million next fiscal year; Bush proposed $10.5 million." and "White House proposal to cut just over $2 billion from the Corps' $6 billion budget request" Stop lying.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#65)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:11:42 PM EST
    et al - AP changes its story.
    The Army Corps of Engineers considers a breach a hole developing in a levee rather than an overrun. The story should have made clear that Bush was warned about floodwaters overrunning the levees, rather than the levees breaking.
    How about some ham to go with that egg on your faces?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#66)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:14:52 PM EST
    Posted by JimakaPPJ March 3, 2006 03:53 PM chaliedontsurf1 Is the Levee System a Federal, State or Local Responsibility?
    Let me answer you this way. There are calls for investigation of the New Orleans levee board. And actually Bush asked for $20M more than the House wanted to give.
    So, you're gonna stick with inaccurately and incompletely, eh? Fair enough. Why quit when you're losin'. As opposed to the calls for investigations of everything from abramoff to iraq to portcenter to cheneyshotsomebodyinthefacegate. Translation - shrub's criminally negligent. congress is even more criminally negligent.
    Of course the real question becomes this. If you live in an area that is below sea level, and has been flooded before, maybe you should tax yourselves for protection rather than asking Aunt Matilda in Denver to pay for it.
    Hey, if you've got a problem with the Louisiana Purchase take it up with Thomas Jefferson. It's not like it was marketed as the mile high city in the brochure when he was ponderin' the purchase. As for how the Federal Government funds it's infrastructure and just WHO it has manage its ports and how it arrives at that decision, tell your troubles to Jesus, Charlie's gone ashore. BTW - Let me repeat Slado's comment. And he actually used a link to prove it. See how useful the linkie thingie is?
    So Bush directly asks Blanco post storm if the levees have broken. Blanco (given free pass by TL) says no. You protest too much. Provide us some links, charlie. Don't let the moon(bats) get in your eyes.
    Evidently, not very. Garbage in, garbage out. Fancier hammer. Same lousy carpenter.
    That tape does prove Kanye mistaken though. It's not that shrub doesn't care about Black People. He doesn't give a damn about anybody. Blanco and Nagin will have to face the voters soon enough. Bush should have to face a firing squad.
    And I love your last comment.
    ... and I've got my sheepskin so I don't do homework anymore.
    Shorter. "We don't need no ed u cation..."
    Actually, ya do. All in all it'd be nice if you'd skip the brick in the wall bit and be a patch in the levee.
    That pretty well sums it up.
    No, but it's a start. Ya can get crackin' on those wmd later. Funny how ya always leave somethin' out. Like the engine block.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#67)
    by Sailor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:16:31 PM EST
    gotta do better than Drudge if you're going to STOP LYING!

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#68)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:25:52 PM EST
    Jim, ya better tell shrub not to be so hard on himself in his own damned report. C'mon, man! Storm the Gate! Beat Down the Door Perform an Intervention! The fate of the Empire is at stake! He actually thinks he's the slightest bit responsible for his own actions and inactions. Only You can prevent integrity. Never mind the armed guards. If you hurry you'll be there to meet Marine One.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#69)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:27:29 PM EST
    Sailor - I see you are still wanting to call people liars, even when all they are doing is quoting other sources. So let me answer you like this. Shame on you for your behavior. It is rude and I used to think better of you than your recent behavior has demonstrated. The following is a quote from this link.
    The House of Representatives wants to cut the New Orleans district budget 21 percent to $272.4 million in 2006, down from $343.5 million in 2005. The House figure is about $20 million lower than the president's suggested $290.7 million budget.


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#70)
    by Sailor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:27:41 PM EST
    The day before the storm hit, Bush was told there were grave concerns that the levees could be overrun. It wasn't until the next morning, as the storm was hitting, that Michael Brown, then head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said Bush had inquired about reports of breache
    If you're drowning do you care if the water came over the levee or thru it? Recap: Bush knew the city could be flooded (see above). Bush knew the city was flooded (see video). Bush said "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees." even tho repeated warnings and simulations said so (see above.)

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#71)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:37:26 PM EST
    charlie - Just for you. Levee Board told floodgates to bar surge from canals. A 400-foot section of the 17th Street Canal floodwall gave way during Katrina when storm surge from Lake Pontchartrain entered the canal, and two sections of floodwall on the London Avenue Canal also breached under the weight of the surge. Levee Board member Allen Borne Jr. asked during the board's meeting whether the corps has plans to "strengthen" the failed 17th Street floodwall. Young answered in the affirmative, You see charlie, the engineers do the planning and issues some contracts, while the board has oversight. Some of the money is straight grants, some budgeted. Some is targeted specifically at the port, which is exclusively Feds. Some goes to the city. Let me hear you sing it again..."We dont need no ed u cation..."

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#72)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:39:09 PM EST
    excuse me - Par 3 and 4 are direct quotes from the article linked to.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#74)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 08:57:26 PM EST
    Jim, you are priceless. Truly a gift that keeps on giving. Thanks - once again - for pointing out that a project will be built with FEDERAL FUNDS THAT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN OTHERWISE AVAILABLE HAD KATRINA NOT HAPPENED AND WHILE IT IS A NECESSARY AND A WORTHWHILE PROJECT, THESE FUNDS HAVE CLEARLY BEEN MADE AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME ON A CYA BASIS TO STOP THE HEMORAGING OF SHRUB'S POLL NUMBERS AND THE DISMAL FORTUNES OF REPUBLICANS RUNNING FOR REELECTION. IN OTHER WORDS, THEY'RE DOING THE RIGHT THING FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS. THAT'S THE BEST YOU'RE GONNA GET OUTTA THIS BUNCH.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#75)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:04:14 PM EST
    charliedontsurf1 - Aint it heck when someone pops in and catches you rambling on in your wild statements. First you claim the NG was gone, and when I prove otherwise you claim you didn't say it. Then you start asking questions about the levee board I show you a news article that exlains it and you start mumbling about serial liars. Let's face it charlie, you admitted you had a sheep skin and didn't need to know anything else. Since you obviously can't keep up, I recommend you reconsider that position. Or at the least, get your college costs refunded. sailor - I love it when you start to lose an argument and want to change the subject. Over topping of a levee is just water coming over it. When the water level drops, the water stops coming over. i.e. The flood is limted. A breach is a breach and the water doesn't stop. The former is a serious problem, the latter is a very, very serious problem. But outside of trying to find something to complain about, the issue of who knew what when is moot because nothing could be done until FEMA arrived. Which it did in record time.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#73)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:14:02 PM EST
    Sailor, ... If I don't get to the bottom of this it could keep me up all night. Or for at least the next five minutes.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#76)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:15:11 PM EST
    Oy, of course they've got local oversight. Everybody gets local oversight on projects like this. But nothing happens without Federal Dollars. That's the fuel. The Levee Board gets to sit behind the wheel of a Ferrari that might as well be up on cinder blocks WITH NO ENGINE without FEDERAL FUNDS. Actually, you do need an education. And since frankly, I've forgotten more than you'll ever know, why don't you just start by Googling just how much of the US economy goes through the Port of New Orleans before ya start thoughtlessly kvetchin' about Aunt Matilda's tax burden. Learn something useful.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#77)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:26:59 PM EST
    It's a heck of a clown act ya got goin' on there, jim. That's for sure. The only thing you've proved is that you can't grasp the fact that if I mention brake fluid, you interpret that as though I'm saying a car doesn't use gasoline. If I mention motor oil, I've turned my back on brake fluid and if I mention antifreeze, you blow a head gasket. If I give ya the recipe for a cake, you stop listenin' at flour. That's why you're you.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#78)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 03, 2006 at 09:31:43 PM EST
    But outside of trying to find something to complain about, the issue of who knew what when is moot because nothing could be done until FEMA arrived. Which it did in record time.
    For when, the Bronze Age!

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#80)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Mar 04, 2006 at 07:35:21 AM EST
    charliedontsurf1 - Your problem charley is that the response was fast. You know it. The world knows it. All you can do is complain and complain trying to echo a press corp. that is so discredited that its viewer numbers are falling as fast as their viewers are dying off. You write:
    It's a heck of a clown act ya got goin' on there, jim. That's for sure. The only thing you've proved is that you can't grasp the fact that if I mention brake fluid, you interpret that as though I'm saying a car doesn't use gasoline.
    Well, when a person starts to complain about something, I expect them to have just a small bit of knowledge of what they are complaining about. Absent that I just put'em down as complainers. So if you think it could do better, let's see some concrete suggestions. What would you have done different? I mean besides putting brake fluid in the oil. BTW - You seem to love baseball metaphors. You know, every time I think of you I am reminded of the midget who went to bat one time for the old St Louis Browns. Waiting for your concrete suggestions, charlie. Jesurgislac - You have sailor's problem. You complain that I lie, but I post links to show my source. That makes you look ridiculous. Why don't you join charlie in actually making some suggestions about what you would have done? Dark Avenger - How about you? Want to say something about the topic?

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#82)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Mar 04, 2006 at 08:44:26 AM EST
    Jim, its federal.

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#83)
    by Sailor on Sat Mar 04, 2006 at 09:25:03 AM EST
    the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requested $27 million for this fiscal year to pay for hurricane-protection projects around Lake Pontchartrain. The Bush administration countered with $3.9 million, and Congress eventually provided $5.7 million
    ppj, it is dishonest because you cherrypicked a quote from an article that damns the president AND the rethuglican controlled house. Even your cherry picked quote says bush reduced the requested amount by over $50Mil. And nowhere do you list the final amount, just what bush supposedly 'proposed.'
    Chertoff could have turned on the television. On the August 30 broadcast of NBC's Today, NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams reported at 7:05 a.m. ET, "There has been a huge development overnight ... the historic French Quarter, dry last night and it is now filling with water. This is water from nearby Lake Pontchartrain; the levees failed overnight." [...] Just hours after the storm passed on Monday, August 29, FEMA director Brown confirmed that the potential for catastrophic flooding remained. In an interview with Brown, NBC Today co-host Matt Lauer noted, "In New Orleans, in particular, they're worried about the levees giving way or the canals not holding,
    How can brownie know this but bush says on 1 September: "I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees." And a worse lie from the admin:
    Brown: "We've provided food to the people at the Convention Center so that they've gotten at least one, if not two meals, every single day" [...] But on September 1, NBC News photojournalist Tony Zumbado reported on MSNBC Live: "I can't put it into words the amount of destruction that is in this city and how these people are coping. They are just left behind. There is nothing offered to them. No water, no ice, no C-rations, nothing, for the last four days."


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#84)
    by Sailor on Sat Mar 04, 2006 at 10:06:03 AM EST
    One of the hardest-hit areas of the New Orleans district's budget is the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, which was created after the May 1995 flood to improve drainage in Jefferson, Orleans and St. Tammany parishes. SELA's budget is being drained from $36.5 million awarded in 2005 to $10.4 million suggested for 2006 by the House of Representatives and the president.
    Louisiana National Guard Said Before Katrina That It Needed Equipment Back From Iraq If It Is To Respond To A Natural Disaster.[ABC 26 WGNO, 8/1/05]
    [ABC 26 WGNO, 8/1/05]

    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#85)
    by Sailor on Sat Mar 04, 2006 at 10:29:12 AM EST
    SEPT. 9, 7:30 a.m. Walter Maestri, emergency management director, Jefferson Parish: ...We've got resources all over the place that aren't being used where they should be, and nobody knows about it. Let me come to our issues. First and foremost, we have still not received since the storm any of our gasoline and diesel shipments. [...] The second issue: generators for our sewer system. As you recall on the last conference call before the storm hit, we requested the gen. packs. They are still not here. [...] [Col. Jeff Smith, deputy director, state Office of Homeland Security and Emergency: ]: Walter, on the Kansas folks, do you have a FEMA liaison that's there with you joined at the hip? Maestri: I've spoken to him about all of these issues, but we still continue to have these problems. Smith: So the liaison is aware of this, but nothing is happening? Maestri: That's right.[...] Smith: I assume you are talking about the emergency food, the water the MRES and the ice. Has that been requested and turned down, or are you just requesting it now? Maestri: We requested it, have requested it, been requesting it, and nothing's come. [...] Oiler: I can certainly agree with Dr. Maestri, we set up a list of priorities. ... I'd like to know where the generators are. Maestri: They said it's coming, it's coming, but nothing's arrived.... They are supposedly pre-positioned across the country and can be flown in at a moment's notice. They ballyhooed that to us in PAM and all these other exercises. Now when we are on our knees, nothing's available.


    Re: Katrina Tapes Speak for Themselves (none / 0) (#86)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Mar 04, 2006 at 06:30:53 PM EST
    charliedontsurf1 - Your problem charley is that the response was fast. You know it. The world knows it. All you can do is complain and complain trying to echo a press corp. that is so discredited that its viewer numbers are falling as fast as their viewers are dying off.
    Oy vey, and if you could limit yourself to one problem we could be outta here before sundown. Actually, I don't know that. I know just the opposite. So does any thinking person in the rest of the world. That would include such traditionally non-thinking people like a republican congressional committee who drafted a report harshly critical of the CRIMINALLY TORTISE-LIKE FEMA RESPONSE as well as a white house report with SIMILAR FINDINGS THAT WERE ALSO HARSHLY CRITICAL OF FEMA'S RESPONSE TIME. SHRUB HAS FINALLY COME CLEAN TO SOME DEGREE THAT THE FEDERAL RESPONSE WAS MUCH TOO SLOW AND INADEQUATE. SO HAS CHERTOFF. SO HAS BROWNIE. SO HAS EVERYONE BUT YOU AND A FEW DELUSIONAL HOLDOUTS WHO SEEM UNABLE AND UNWILLING TO GRASP THE REALITY THAT YOUR BELOVED FUHRER HAS CONFESSED.
    Well, when a person starts to complain about something, I expect them to have just a small bit of knowledge of what they are complaining about. Absent that I just put'em down as complainers. So if you think it could do better, let's see some concrete suggestions. What would you have done different? I mean besides putting brake fluid in the oil.
    Waiting for your concrete suggestions, charlie.
    Actually, I do have a few thoughts that involve concrete, the administration, republicans in congress, shoes, boats and deep water. Addition by subtraction. Let the lot of 'em resign and get a legitimate, competent Government in place to try and clean up this mess he's left us before it's too late. He waits too much longer, bush could become the English word for Romanov.
    Jesurgislac - You have sailor's problem. You complain that I lie, but I post links to show my source. That makes you look ridiculous.
    Actually, it removes all doubt about their contentions.