home

DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail Detainee Homicides


The ACLU has released another 9,000 pages of documents it received from the Defense Department pursuant to its Freedom of Information Act request. Check out this document (pdf) charting the detainee deaths prior to May, 2004.

Of 58 deaths, 8 were homicides and several others were unknown or under investigation. It lists each death and a cause. Here are some of them:

"Soldier killed detainee in violation of ROE"; "Soldier killed detainee while handcuffed"; "1 strangulation found outside isolation unit"; "1 blunt force trauma and choking, died during interrogation" (there are three of these); "Soldier drowned detainee, body not found"; and "died sleeping after interrogation."

And that's just one document I happened to click on out of the 9,000 new pages. As to Gen. Sanchez, the ACLU reports:

[A] May 19, 2004 Defense Intelligence Agency document implicating Sanchez in potentially abusive interrogation techniques. In the document, an officer in charge of a team of interrogators stated that there was a 35-page order spelling out the rules of engagement that interrogators were supposed to follow, and that they were encouraged to "go to the outer limits to get information from the detainees by people who wanted the information." When asked to whom the officer was referring, the officer answered "LTG Sanchez." The officer stated that the expectation coming from "Headquarters" was to break the detainees.

The ACLU says these documents prove again that the torture and abuse have not been the work of "a few bad apples":

The ACLU also released an Information Paper entitled "Allegations of Detainee Abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan" dated April 2, 2004, two weeks before the world saw the pictures of torture at Abu Ghraib prison. The paper outlined the status of 62 investigations of detainee abuse and detainee deaths. Cases include assaults, punching, kicking and beatings, mock executions, sexual assault of a female detainee, threatening to kill an Iraqi child to "send a message to other Iraqis," stripping detainees, beating them and shocking them with a blasting device, throwing rocks at handcuffed Iraqi children, choking detainees with knots of their scarves and interrogations at gunpoint.

In other words, two weeks before Abu Ghraib news broke, the Defense Department knew there was widespread abuse and systemic problems.

Of the 62 cases being investigated at the time, at least 26 involved detainee deaths. Some of the cases had already gone through a court-martial proceeding. The abuses went beyond Abu Ghraib, and touched Camp Cropper, Camp Bucca and other detention centers in Mosul, Samarra, Baghdad, Tikrit, as well as Orgun-E in Afghanistan.

In related news, Amnesty International has released its torture report submitted to the UN Committee Against Torture which is meeting May 5 to 8 in Geneva to consider U.S. compliance with the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

The U.S. is sending a 30 person delegation to the meeting to defend its record. From the Amnesty Int'l press release:

The report reviews several cases where detainees held in U.S. custody in Afghanistan and Iraq have died under torture. To this day, no U.S. agent has been prosecuted for "torture" or "war crimes."

"The heaviest sentence imposed on anyone to date for a torture-related death while in U.S. custody is five months -- the same sentence that you might receive in the U.S. for stealing a bicycle. In this case, the five-month sentence was for assaulting a 22-year-old taxi-driver who was hooded and chained to a ceiling while being kicked and beaten until he died," said Goering.

"While the government continues to try to claim that the abuse of detainees in U.S. custody was mainly due to a few 'aberrant' soldiers, there is clear evidence to the contrary. Most of the torture and ill-treatment stemmed directly from officially sanctioned procedures and policies -- including interrogation techniques approved by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld," said Javier Zuniga, Amnesty International's Americas Program Director.

Rumsfeld should be leading the delegation. He has the most explaining to do. I'd bet he's not even going.

< Dems Prepare to Block Terrence Boyle's Nomination | Wednesday Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    War is tough

    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#2)
    by jen on Wed May 03, 2006 at 04:51:02 AM EST
    so how do all these methods that "aren't torture" lead to deaths of those not being tortured? Why do the low ranking people get the longest sentences while the higher ranking people who actualy KILL - more valuable sources of information even (ie the general in the bag) - get nothing?

    Arthur Sibler has written an Extensive series of essays on this subject. The link takes you to an index page where he writes about the different aspects of this shameful practice. In reccomending Arthur's writings again I cannot as I did the last time say "Enjoy"

    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#4)
    by Edger on Wed May 03, 2006 at 05:49:59 AM EST
    This is sick, disgusting, psychotic behavior. So will be any attempted defense or justification of it. This kind of thing can only be done by people who like doing it, who get some kind of twisted kick out of it. In the retail world a happy customer tells no one about you, but a customer treated badly will badmouth you to as many friends as possible. Aim for their hearts and minds? Beat some respect into them? Excuse me... but which country did the attacking here? It will be morbidly interesting to see who will define themselves by supporting or defending this crap.

    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#5)
    by Edger on Wed May 03, 2006 at 05:54:38 AM EST
    Equally morbidly interesting will be to see who here remains silent on this thread...

    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#6)
    by kdog on Wed May 03, 2006 at 05:57:06 AM EST
    The incarcerated persons are not detainees....they are prisoners. Let's not parse words.

    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#7)
    by Edger on Wed May 03, 2006 at 06:06:22 AM EST
    The people who do this need to be tried, convicted, and given the harshest possible punishment for this. As does everyone above them in the chain of command, authority and responsibility above them who condoned it or even turned a blind eye to it. As does everyone who attempts to justify it, or will not condemn it wholeheartedly.

    Tl. Powerful graphic.

    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#9)
    by Al on Wed May 03, 2006 at 06:44:59 AM EST
    A question for the lawyers out there: Is it possible for the victims or the victims' families to launch a civil suit against anyone who had a hand in their torture or their murder? What would it take?

    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#10)
    by legion on Wed May 03, 2006 at 07:38:12 AM EST
    Here's another question - was Sanchez sworn when he was testifying before Congress about Abu Ghraib? Can;t he be hauled back out for lying based on this evidence? Alternatively, I know that _all_ 3 and 4 star officer retirements must be blessed by the Senate. How long until he tries to retire?

    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#11)
    by profmarcus on Wed May 03, 2006 at 08:57:15 AM EST
    we must not forget that general ricardo sanchez appeared before the senate armed services committee on may 19, 2004, and perjured himself when questioned whether or not he authored a memorandum of september 14, 2003, authorizing the use of torture techniques in abu ghraib in contravention of geneva... and, in response to the above commenter, yes, he was sworn... i posted about it this past april along with a transcription of the memorandum... i labored over making the transcription as a public service because the aclu pdf's were difficult to access and read... sanchez has never been charged with perjury for that instance of outright lying... perhaps it's time now to think about it... god knows, it's long overdue... Visit my blog: And, yes, I DO take it personally

    The use of torture on, and the murder of, prisoners under our control is vile and horrifying and the sadists responsible for it must be brought to justice. What bothers me more is wondering what comes next. Violence usually escalates and we've been watching that happen. After torturing and sometimes murdering individuals we've graduated to committing even bigger atrocities such as destroying entire cities such as Fallujah and most of it's male inhabitants. What's next? Saturation bombing of select areas of Iraq and Iran?

    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#13)
    by Sailor on Wed May 03, 2006 at 10:29:40 AM EST
    Re: DOD Documents Implicates Gen. Sanchez, Detail (none / 0) (#14)
    by jondee on Wed May 03, 2006 at 01:06:25 PM EST
    Sailor - If ever there was a song whose time had come - again, its that one. Hopefully there wont be too many Sam Stones coming back in the next few years.