Judging the Duke Lacrosse Players
by TChris
Apart from Jeralyn's informative observations here at TalkLeft, some of the most interesting takes on the Duke lacrosse case have come from sports columnists. In a piece headlined "Justice is getting lost in Duke case," the Kansas City Star's Jason Whitlock argues that it's time for sensationalists to take a step back and look at the evidence:
The fact that one of the arrested suspects seems to have an airtight alibi -- a cabbie, cell phone records, an ATM receipt and record of entrance into his dorm room -- is completely ignored. So is the fact that the other stripper clearly has questionable motives and is interested in seeing if she can "spin" this tragedy to her advantage and possibly make a little cash.
Criminal accusations, Whitlock reminds us, should be judged on their merit, not on preconceptions about the likely behavior of privileged white men and black female college students of significantly lesser means. Deeper societal issues of racial injustice may or may not be showcased in a particular trial, but they can't be remedied in a criminal prosecution. Prosecutions depend on facts, not stereotypes. It is unjust to base opinions about the merits of an accusation on the race or social status of the accuser or accused.
Again, I don't know what happened inside that house. But I do know that Martin Luther King Jr. and many, many others of all races did not die so that the poor, black and oppressed could surrender the moral high ground and attempt to inflict injustice on the privileged. ... We're far better served being on the side of justice at all times and complaining when it doesn't arrive at our doorstep rather than rooting for injustice to befall the privileged.
< Guiding Words | Pandering With Proposed Amendments > |