Unwed Parents Face Eviction
TChris printable version print page     Bookmark and Share
Wed May 17, 2006 at 01:41:10 PM EST

by TChris

There may be a legitimate public interest in limiting the number of people who are permitted to occupy a single residence, but that interest doesn't justify an ordinance that permits families to live together if the parents are married to each other while prohibiting them from living together if the parents are unmarried. The St. Louis suburb of Black Jack nonetheless thinks it has the right to keep unmarried couples with more than one child from occupying the same home.

The mayor said those who fall into that category could soon face eviction.... Mayor Norman McCourt said starting Wednesday the city will begin trying to evict groups who do not fit into Black Jack's definition of family, reports CBS affiliate KMOV-TV in St. Louis.

Putting aside whether the law is so arbitrary as to violate the constitutional right to equal protection, or whether it invades a couples' personal privacy interest in deciding whether to marry before cohabiting, the ordinance is poor public policy. Does putting families out on the street promote family values?




These people need to get a life. Trite, but true.

by aw on Wed May 17, 2006 at 01:57:21 PM EST

Welcome to Missouri. Indiana Lite. Redheaded stepchild of Arkansas. Utah wanna-be... I'd LOVE it if someone could post a link to a chart/graph of unwed mothers vs. the state they live in. I'm pretty sure MO is way up there. And while we're at it, let's look at meth production vs. state. Yes, MO, you're really setting the moral curves for this country...

by Punchy on Wed May 17, 2006 at 02:01:47 PM EST

Whenever I hear something like this, I think it must have come from too much late night religious TV. Some dumbass is sipping his whiskey and getting all fired up about the decline of our moral standing. They decide they'll do whatever they can in their power to change it. The next morning, with the hangover to make them even more feisty, they draw up the plan's particulars. No thought about the actual people it might effect. At least the televangelists will approve.

by Talkleft Visitor on Wed May 17, 2006 at 02:02:08 PM EST

Does putting families out on the street promote family values?
It depends on what your definition of 'family' is. For some, nothing they do will allow them to enter into the family values super saved club. God does not save the wicked especially when it is the wicked who are doing the counting.

by squeaky on Wed May 17, 2006 at 02:03:44 PM EST

I think this is intended to protect landlords and neighborhoods from letting people, gasp, share housing. First folks share housing, then they form a commune, next thing you know it's Moscow.

by Talkleft Visitor on Wed May 17, 2006 at 02:11:10 PM EST

Nuke-u-lar families are the only families!

by Talkleft Visitor on Wed May 17, 2006 at 02:22:20 PM EST

The christianofascists want to be able to control the government and the lives of everyone. They are a small but rapidly growing extremist group that are one of the parts of Bush's base. Google Dominionism read and be frightened.

by soccerdad on Wed May 17, 2006 at 03:13:20 PM EST

IIRC, the government has a "compelling interest" in encouraging family structure. This policy is compatible with that interest. It's not so different from allowing married couples priviledges related to taxes, Social Security, and so on. This is not an endorsement of the policy, just an attempt at understanding the law.

by roy on Wed May 17, 2006 at 03:42:01 PM EST

It's not so different from allowing married couples priviledges [sic] related to taxes, Social Security, and so on.
The problem is that housing isn't a privilege bestowed by the government, though having a place to live is considered desirable by society, and there are certain laws in place to try to make the process of finding a place to live a fair one. But generally, it's a business contract between the renter and the landlord. So if the government is going to interfere, why should they do anything but try to make sure the process is fair on all sides? Why should they encourage landlords to discriminate against their tenants? What if the unmarried couple and their kids are really good tenants, and the yuppie schmucks who replace them are not so much? And it's one thing to give people incentives and tax breaks to get married, and another thing to force them to do so by kicking them out of their homes. Great. Is Black Jack going to pay for the counseling sessions as well? Do they have any idea how much homeless shelters cost?

by Talkleft Visitor on Wed May 17, 2006 at 03:56:36 PM EST

Strange...in a so-called 'free' country no less. Strange indeed.

by kdog on Wed May 17, 2006 at 04:01:42 PM EST

The current ordinance prohibits more than three people from living together unless they are related by "blood, marriage or adoption." I imagine the details are spelled out better in the actual ordinance? Otherwise it seems quite complicated to me: If the children all belong to the mother and same father, then only two of them are unrelated and that family would seem to be "acceptable". But if any of the kids has a different father (or mother) then the family is in violation and liable for eviction. Gonna be a big problem for divorced couples with kids isn't it? Especially if they are devout Catholics.

by Talkleft Visitor on Wed May 17, 2006 at 04:05:35 PM EST

Google Dominionism read and be frightened.
Well I guess you're not of the body. I submit. I bear myself to the will of Landru. - The Return of the Archons

by desertswine on Wed May 17, 2006 at 04:15:25 PM EST

Devout Catholics don't get divorced, Tortoise, they live unhappily ever after...safe in the knowledge that although they hate each other, at least they have a roof over their heads.

by HK on Wed May 17, 2006 at 04:16:59 PM EST

IIRC, the government has a "compelling interest" in encouraging family structure
Why? And more to the point, the gov't has no business deciding what a 'family structure' is. And further, since the divorce rate among gay married couples is so much lower than among straight married couples, would you want the gov't to mandate homosexuality?

by Sailor on Wed May 17, 2006 at 04:19:27 PM EST

May I suggest that counsel for the couple in question review City of E. Cleveland v. Moore and then quickly file suit.

by Talkleft Visitor on Wed May 17, 2006 at 05:17:09 PM EST

Yes. Moore v. City of East Cleveland, Ohio, 431 U.S. 494 (1977) is directly on point. Rejecting arguments that the ordinance served to prevent overcrowding, minimize traffic, and avoid burdening the public school system, the court held that the provision had but a tenuous relation to the alleviation of these objectives. Nor was the constitutional right to live together as a family limited to the nuclear family, the court ruled, as the extended family traditionally played a role in providing sustenance and security. Cutting off protection of family rights at the first convenient boundary, the nuclear family, was arbitrary and could not be justified.

by txpublicdefender on Wed May 17, 2006 at 06:47:21 PM EST

(religiosity + love of punishing others + lack of publicly stated sentiment to the contrary)P*2 (i.e., squared by major involvement in politics) = major human meanness. this equation isn't new. it was worked out at least 5000 years ago.

by orionATL on Wed May 17, 2006 at 06:53:18 PM EST

The obvious course here is... After you get rid of sinners with children, it will soon be illegal for anyone but white-christian-religionutjobs to live together, under the holy bond of an official gov't religious ceremony... Vile.

by Johnny on Thu May 18, 2006 at 02:33:08 AM EST

After looking at the racial makeup of the city and the city council, I would imagine rainbow-push will not protest this.

by Talkleft Visitor on Thu May 18, 2006 at 02:04:28 PM EST


WWW Talk To Action



Honored to be here, and legalization of pot progress-hurdles
Briefly, I am thrilled to be permitted the "diary" honor, and hope to prove that to be a good decision. To dive right in to a topic, I'd like to share my current thinking......
Lfrieling (0 comments)
Mr. President, the answer is 'No.'
Mr. President, there has been a whole lot of strange and wacky stuff going on. Heck, it looks like your attempt to imitate "W" Bush in foreign policy, except you added steroids. That's only......
jeffinalabama (3 comments)
"The Town"-Not What it's Cracked Up to Be:
Ben Affleck's 3 year old movie, "The Town", starring Ben Affleck himself as the lead character, as well as the director, Jeremy Renner, Owen Burke and "Slaine" i. e. George Carroll, is not all......
mplo (3 comments)
How I Came to Love West Side Story:
After writing a whole diary about how I came to love West Side Story and just about finishing it, only to have it disappear on me just out of the blue (yes, this has......
mplo (4 comments)
Why I'm Against the Death Penalty:
The Death Penalty has always been a controversial topic, but it's become even more controversial nowadays, during the post-9/11 era that we're now going through.  There are people on the Left as well as......
mplo (5 comments)
A short primer on buying and selling guns - part I
The discussion on this site (and others) has been suffering from a lack of accurate information on how people buy and sell guns and the laws and regulations that govern them when they do.......
scribe (7 comments)
Some notes on Health Care reform.
First, it works. The benefits outweigh any amount of problems. The deal is simple. Pass something, then go back and modify it. In reality, the Republicans in congress have no willingness as a party......
jeffinalabama (10 comments)
How did we get here? Part one of an examination
Foreword: This diary is the first in a series examining, inter alia, the political economy of the United States. Much of what you read here will be historical, and general in application.  The drive......
jeffinalabama (2 comments)
Time for analysis, with your help, please
I'm in-between some major treatments, but I woke up today with a clear mind and some energy. I'd like to start adding some analysis from the margins (I remain marginalized, not simply by choice,......
jeffinalabama (8 comments)
The Banks Are Made of Marble
And banks want one thing: profits. It is easier to get a loan at a community bank or a credit union, but either wants their vig. you tube ......
jeffinalabama (13 comments)
'Advanced' Civilization: The Long Party is Over
Crossposted from Antemedius "Our current way of life is unsustainable. We are the first species that will have to self-consciously impose limits on ourselves if we are to survive." -- Robert Jensen In 2010......
Edger (3 comments)
Violence at Occupy Protests Becoming A Serious Problem Across America
Crossposted from Antemedius "Occupy LA has brought needed attention to the growing disparities in our country and I look forward to its ongoing efforts to build an economy that works for everyone," [Los Angeles......
Edger (1 comment)

More Diaries...




All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors. Everything else © 2005 Talk to Action, LLC.