home

No Decision in Hamden Today

Scotus Blog reports the Supreme Court did not issue a decison in the Hamdan case today. But, it issued two decisions unfavorable to criminal defendants.

In a ruling written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., the Court concluded that states may bar foreign nationals from raising the issue of their treaty rights to talk with a consular officer , if they did not raise that issue at trial. The Court majority said that the outcome was dictated by the Court's 1998 summary decision in Breard v. Greene. The Court did not resolve the issue of whether individuals could sue to enforce the consular rights treaty, the Vienna
Convention.

In a 5-3 ruling, the Court decided that prison officials may deny newspapers, magazines and photographs to their most dangerous inmates. The plurality opinion by Justice Stephen G. Breyer upheld such a ban. Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., took no part. He had dissented when the Third Circuit struck down the ban.

Also, according to Scotus Blog,

The Chief Justice announced that the Court will issue remaining decisions in the Term at 10 a.m. Thursday. The still-undecided cases are the war crimes tribunal case and a test of the right to raise an insanity defense to criminal charges.

< Sticking Up for the New York Times | Guantanamo and Abuse of Presidential Power >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: No Decision in Hamden Today (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Jun 28, 2006 at 08:25:14 AM EST
    Forgive me for asking but what is the significance of the ban on newspapers etc? Possibly a little off topic, but not entirely tangential. Showing on TV here in the UK is a series of programs from the supermax facility at Warbash. I can only describe the conditions in the high security block as hell on earth, for inmate and staff alike. To write further on the subject is not my goal other than to mention how easy it is for us to take for granted, and here I use the term loosely, our talents. That we read, and on occassion contribute to this blog and others like it, is probably something that so very easily we take for granted. Depicted in this program was an inmate living, if it could be called that, under the twenty three hour locked down regime. He was suffering loss of privilages as a punishment, inasmuch that the staff had taken away his TV. The program then went on to mention the guy was illiterate. There is I think little more for me to say other than to thank the faeries for my abillity to read, and given that abillity, the means to escape.

    Re: No Decision in Hamden Today (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Jun 30, 2006 at 03:55:36 AM EST
    My newspaper question should't have been asked, intellectualy I was down another path when I worded it.