home

Human Rights Watch: Prosecute Officers Responsible For Detainee Abuse

by TChris

Interviews of soldiers conducted by Human Rights Watch confirm that abuse of detainees in Iraq continued to be routine even after the well-publicized mistreatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. Human Rights Watch concludes that military investigations have shielded those in the chain of command who ordered or condoned abuse.

"Soldiers were told that the Geneva Conventions did not apply, and that interrogators could use abusive techniques to get detainees to talk," said John Sifton, the author of the report and the senior researcher on terrorism and counterterrorism at Human Rights Watch. "These accounts rebut U.S. government claims that torture and abuse in Iraq was unauthorized and exceptional - on the contrary, it was condoned and commonly used."

Human Rights Watch said that the new report shows how soldiers who felt abusive practices were wrong or illegal faced significant obstacles at every turn when they attempted to report or expose the abuses. For example, an MP guard at the facility near al-Qaim, who complained to an officer about beatings and other abuse he witnessed, was told, "You need to go ahead and drop this, sergeant."

The guard told Human Rights Watch, "It was repeatedly emphasized to me that this was not a wise course of action to pursue . . . 'You don't want to take this inquiry anywhere else,' kind of thing. 'You should definitely drop this; this is not something you wanna do." ...

Human Rights Watch said that the report showed that criminal investigations of abuses need to follow the military chain of command, rather than focusing on low-level soldiers. To date, not a single military intelligence officer has been court-martialed in connection with abuse allegations in Iraq. Human Rights Watch is unaware of any criminal investigations into wrongdoing by officers overseeing interrogations and detention operations in Iraq.

Human Rights Watch called on the U.S. Congress to appoint an independent, bipartisan commission to investigate the true scope of detainee abuse in Iraq, the complicity of higher-level officials, and the systemic flaws that make it difficult for soldiers to report abuses they witness. Human Rights Watch also called on the president to appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate and prosecute the perpetrators of abuse, including the military and civilian leaders who authorized or condoned abuse.

< Late Nite: Miami Vice Redux | Saddam Hussein Hospitalized, Being Force Fed >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Here's what happens when a government worker mentions Geneva Conventions on a blog:
    Christine Axsmith, a software contractor for the CIA, considered her blog a success within the select circle of people who could actually access it.
    Only people with top-secret security clearances could read her musings, which were posted on Intelink, the intelligence community's classified intranet. Writing as Covert Communications, CC for short, she opined in her online journal on such national security conundrums as stagflation, the war of ideas in the Middle East and -- in her most popular post -- bad food in the CIA cafeteria.
    . . .
    On July 13, after she posted her views on torture and the Geneva Conventions, her blog was taken down and her security badge was revoked. On Monday, Axsmith was terminated by her employer, BAE Systems, which was helping the CIA test software.


    Re: Human Rights Watch: Prosecute Officers Respon (none / 0) (#2)
    by Dadler on Sun Jul 23, 2006 at 02:14:19 PM EST
    SteveAudio, Real freedom is for suckers, I guess.

    Re: Human Rights Watch: Prosecute Officers Respon (none / 0) (#3)
    by jen on Mon Jul 24, 2006 at 05:45:16 AM EST
    G*d forbid our soldiers acually BELIEVE in personal responsibility, the nco creed, their oath, or honor. Orders are orders after all.

    Re: Human Rights Watch: Prosecute Officers Respon (none / 0) (#4)
    by Che's Lounge on Mon Jul 24, 2006 at 06:28:16 AM EST
    Grunts and non-coms get arrested. Officers get re-assigned or a piece of paper gets put in their files. Those ultimately responsible for these crimes are promoted to positions like Secretary of State, or given the Medal of Freedom.

    Re: Human Rights Watch: Prosecute Officers Respon (none / 0) (#5)
    by jen on Mon Jul 24, 2006 at 08:11:48 AM EST
    Only if they go along, Che's