home

The New Dem "Conservatives": Actually Economic Populists

It is pretty funny that the Media is trying to turn the Democratic Party into the conservative party and I am all for it. But they have run into a tough reality - the common theme of Democrats is economic populism:

[M]any of these freshmen Democrats are hard to pigeonhole ideologically. Even among the most socially conservative, there is a strong streak of economic populism that is a unifying force.

It's as if William Jennings Bryan won. I am a free trader so this is not really good news for my economic views, but facts are facts.

Heath Shuler, for example, the former professional football player and newly elected Democrat from North Carolina, is anti-abortion and pro-gun, but sounds like an old-style Democrat on economic issues.

“I was taught at a very, very young age about faith and personal responsibility, and through that, that responsibility was about helping those who cannot help themselves,” Mr. Shuler said. “If you look at what the Democratic Party stands for, it is about helping others who can’t help themselves.”

Like other Democrats, he supports legislation to increase the minimum wage and make college tuition tax deductible. He also opposes trade agreements that he says have led to a 78 percent loss in textile industry jobs in his state.

Similarly, Ms. Boyda of Kansas, a first-time office holder who relied on lengthy newspaper inserts to make her case to the voters, said, “The rural economy has been left out.” She added: “A lot of my district feels a great deal of insecurity about their jobs, their health care, their business, their family farm. They feel like they’re just kind of hanging out there.”

Carol Shea-Porter, a social worker and new House member from New Hampshire who considers herself a populist, said, “The theme of my campaign was, I’m running for the rest of us.” She added that no matter how much the Bush administration boasted of job growth, her voters “understood those were Wal-Mart jobs.” And, she said, “They understood when they talked about the stock market boom, that half of Americans aren’t even in the stock market.”

Jim Webb, who defeated Senator George Allen of Virginia, campaigned heavily on the idea that the middle class was increasingly at risk in an age of growing inequality. Bob Casey, who overwhelmingly defeated Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, said he looked forward to “a really intensive focus on health care that I hope to be a part of.”

But it gets better:

That economic populism extends, for many candidates, to a new emphasis on expanding health coverage. Congressional Democrats who lived through the Clinton administration’s failed effort to create a national health insurance plan, which many believe was a crucial factor in the Democrats’ losses in 1994, have been wary of broad health legislation for years. (And being in the minority, they were unable to do much about it, regardless.) But the class of ’06 is adamant that something major can, and will, be done.

Dave Loebsack, a political science professor in Iowa who unseated the veteran Republican moderate, Representative Jim Leach, said he intended to sign on to proposed legislation to create a single-payer, national health insurance program “as one of the first things I will do when I get to Congress.”

“I have no idea where it’s going to go next year,” Mr. Loebsack said, “but at least we can give it a fair hearing.”

Steven Kagen, an allergist who won a Wisconsin district that has been represented by a Republican for much of the past 30 years, campaigned on a “No Patient Left Behind” plan. Mr. Kagen won despite doubters who called it “the Hillary hot potato,” a reference to the first lady turned New York senator who was the architect of the Clinton plan.

“This issue has blurred the lines between the two parties,” he said. “You don’t have to be a Republican or a Democrat to be ill, and to understand that the health care system doesn’t work.”

Mr. Kagen is one of several new members urging a renewed commitment to the more than eight million uninsured children in the United States, an issue that will move to the forefront when the State Children’s Health Insurance Program comes up for renewal next year.

Most of these new Democrats said they were also committed to changes in the new Medicare prescription drug program; in fact, giving the government the power to negotiate prices with drug companies is one of the first items of business in the Democrats’ “Six for ’06 Agenda.” (The agenda also includes an increase in the minimum wage and expansion of embryonic stem cell research.)

. . . Representative Sherrod Brown, who is moving to the Senate from the House after beating Senator Mike DeWine of Ohio, argued: “Tell me a whole lot of Republicans won’t work with us on finding a way for middle-class kids to get a college education, to vote for embryonic stem cell research, to raise the minimum wage. John McCain is already out there talking about prescription drug issues.”

Oh these conservative Democrats! Boy the Republicans won the battle of ideas all right. I love it.

< The Myth of The "Values" Voter | The Sillinesss of Broderism's Independent Center >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Same Dems, new name (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by rdandrea on Sat Nov 11, 2006 at 03:36:50 PM EST
    I believe that "economic populists" used to be called "Lunch Box Democrats."

    It's why many of us are Dems.  The party used to represent the working class. Maybe they still do. Let's see how they do this term.

    Geez those Reporters are idiots (none / 0) (#2)
    by Molly Bloom on Sat Nov 11, 2006 at 07:36:11 PM EST
    [M]any of these freshmen Democrats are hard to pigeonhole ideologically. Even among the most socially conservative, there is a strong streak of economic populism that is a unifying force.

    Economic populism is a Democratic party tradition. I mean have they never heard of the New Deal or FDR or Harry Truman or Andrew Jackson and on and on and on...

    And the editors who let this get through ought to be shot at dawn as well. Geez.



    Since the DLC took over... (none / 0) (#3)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 12:25:05 AM EST
    It's been strictly corporate whoring. Time to get back to the roots!

    economic populism has been dormant so long ... (none / 0) (#4)
    by Deconstructionist on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 10:56:21 AM EST
      ...that it has been mostly ignored. to the extent it has received  attention most  has been directed to the exemlars of those who practice eco-terroriam and protest in the streets, and the focus is only on the anti-social means employed by the radical fringe.  There has been almost no debate about a generation of policies that have allowed our domestic manufacturiung base to whither simulataneously with a marginalization of union power and substantial relative  redirection of wealth away from the people most disadvantaged by trade and fiscal policy.

     Otherwise, "Liberal" and Conservative" are defined by most with reference to a handful of divisive social issues.

       It is time to get back to the roots. The Party needs to be one where the common denominators are support for the economic interedts of the middle class and especially the blue collar middle class.

      Those who seek to make the "test" for being an acceptable Democrat  one's positions on abortion, gay rights, etc.,  while allowing the Party to not merely tolerate but often  welcome and champion policies that benefit the rich and connected and ecomically disenfranchise the less fortunate are the primary cause of our problems.

      We are at a crossroads. Are we going to be the Party of FDR through LBJ or we going to be the wing of Republican Party for those  who mock and belittle people who are socially conservative?

    WE can't do both? (none / 0) (#5)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 11:03:14 AM EST
    Serupisly though, you really believe tat mocking people who are ssocially conservative is a Dem plank?

    You actually believe that?  How is that done? by being pro-choice, pro-science, pro-privacy, pro-separation of church and state?

    There is something not true about your spin.

    Parent

    If true, they will be turned out in '08. (none / 0) (#6)
    by ThatLawyerDude on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 11:13:39 AM EST
    Populism is in reality an attempt to redistribute wealth through tax and spend methods. I do not think this describes Tester or Webb. If the Democratic leadership see's this election as a testament to populism, they are a one term leadership.
    Voters in this election switched sides because of the way Republicans have been spending money. They also switched sides because of the way Republicans have been trying to force Bible belt values down the nation's throat. Especially in judicial appointment.
    Populism is where Obama says the democrats are. I would suggest he is wrong. Tester is a better description of what brought the democrats here. I suggest the Democrats grab a Gadsen Flag and wave "it" in front of their candidates if they expect to be winners in '08.

    It's not a plank... (none / 0) (#7)
    by Deconstructionist on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 12:00:02 PM EST
    ... but it is way too prevalent and the unmistakable antipathy for  the values of many  blue collar men has led to a loss of empathy for the needs of the working class and that is reflected in policy positions.

      It's not having differing positions on abortion, gay rights, guns, etc., it's the undeniable attitude among many that those who have differing positions should be mocked and shunned.

      You can respectfully disagree with people on those issues without making them feel unwelcome. More importantly, we must give blue collar voters strong reasons to vote for us even though they disagree with the Party planks on some social issues.

      A situation where blue collar voters perceive little difference on economic policies makes it much easier for Republicans to exploit social issues.

     

    Well (none / 0) (#8)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 12:38:09 PM EST
    You seem determined to think that.

    IT is not true.

    Parent