home

Election 2006: The Pre-Mortem

The Washington Monthly has an interesting series of articles providing a pre-mortem on the elections. The idea is to take the two outcomes, generally Dems win and/or GOP wins, and give advice. A lot of the articles are good but I really like my friend Ed Kilgore's piece, and am taking it to heart:

First, share the credit and forget about blame. Inevitably, some in the party will interpret the victory as a vindication or repudiation of one theory or another about how to win elections. . . There’s never one path to political success, and there’s no guarantee that the political landscape in two years will look anything like it does today. . . .

Second, share the spotlight. There’s been a lot of agonizing in recent years about the absence of any single voice for the Democratic Party. . . [L]et’s hope the new congressional poobahs can magnify their voices through cooperation, and it would also be nice if they coordinated with state and local Democrats, not to mention the Democratic National Committee as well.

Third, make it instantly clear that this will be a very different Congress. Democrats were able to seize the mantle of change in this election because it was impossible for Republicans to avoid accountability for the status quo. That’s over. Right off the bat, Democrats should take bold steps to clean up both houses of Congress, enacting ethics and lobbying reform legislation (preferably tougher than what the Democratic caucuses agreed on earlier this year). Hearings on public financing of elections would be helpful. . . And yes, Congress should finally begin exercising the oversight and investigations responsibilities the GOP abandoned—especially with respect to the Iraq disaster—with one major caveat: The congressional leadership should quietly make it clear that its own committee and subcommittee chairs (most of whom will become very energized by the unfamiliar feel of the gavel) will be equally subject to oversight, and that caucus discipline will be applied to those who go far off message in order to watch themselves on television each night.

Fourth and finally, reject the false choice between “getting something done” and “throwing anvils to the GOP.” Whenever possible, do both. . .

I can't think of a thing I disagree with in Ed's prescriptions. Let's hope they are relevant tomorrow night.

< Misleading Robo Calls Target WI Race | Pundit Silliness >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    generally......................... (none / 0) (#1)
    by cpinva on Mon Nov 06, 2006 at 11:53:13 PM EST
    Dems win and/or GOP wins

    aren't those pretty much the only two possible outcomes? is satan and his evil hoard running a third party slate, and i missed it? this possibly explains the horned shadows on the walls, to the left of the dem & rep candidates, that i've noticed in so many pictures recently.

    of course, there are two other possible outcomes: dems lose and/or repubs lose. as well, there's also a less likely outcome: everyone loses, and we don't have a next congress.

    hmmmmmm, come to think of it....................:)

    Well (none / 0) (#4)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Nov 07, 2006 at 09:55:10 AM EST
    I was thinking along the lines of Dems win big, Dems win small, etc.

    Parent
    nuts....................... (none / 0) (#2)
    by cpinva on Mon Nov 06, 2006 at 11:54:23 PM EST
    that should be "horde", not hoard. although, as i think about it, satan could be hoarding his horde.................

    Re: Pre-Mortem (none / 0) (#3)
    by Edger on Tue Nov 07, 2006 at 06:23:12 AM EST
       
    You must leave now, take what you need, you think will last.
    But whatever you wish to keep, you better grab it fast.
    Yonder stands your orphan with his gun,
    Crying like a fire in the sun.
    Look out the saints are comin' through
    And it's all over now, Baby Blue.