home

Did Abu Gonzo perjure himself?

We all remember the kabuki hearings Specter's Judiciary Committee held, when it came out that the Administration had decided to wiretap Americans, regardless of what the FISA and Constitution say.

The Attorney General of the United States, the Hon. Alberto Gonzales, known here by his nickname Abu Gonzo, dragged his feet on the way up to the Senate, much like a plainly guilty fourth-grader on his way to principal's office.  The miracle of this was that The Hon. Arlen Specter, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, even entertained the idea of hearings, let alone caused them to be held.  Specter, we should remember, was fresh off winning re-election, having barely prevailed in the face of a White House-encouraged primary challenge from his right by the carpetbagging Chris Toomey (R-Club for Growth) when the NSA wiretap scandal broke.  That, and he had to deal, no doubt, with the fear of being beeyotch-slapped by Deadeye Dick and his Blackmail book.

When Gonzales arrived, he devoted most of his answers to not answering the few direct questions he received, intoning the need to fight terrorists and to have the tools to do so, and to soaking up the encomia showered upon his personage by the Administration's toadies on the Committee - Cormyn, Graham, and others.

Unfortunately, his prearranged script was, well, not fully accurate and, in this author's opinion, he perjured himself.

Last week, the New York Daily News broke the story that the President had asserted the right to open first-class mail, without a warrant, in another of those things he calls signing statements.  It's noteworthy it only took about 3 weeks (the statement slid under the door after the December 20 signing) for the press to catch up.

Today, it comes out that Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin has written The Unit, demanding an answer to a very simple question:

 has your administration authorized any government agency to read Americans' first-class mail without obtaining a search warrant, complying with the applicable court order requirements of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or satisfying Postal Service regulations?

Abu Gonzo, sweatin' the testimony, went through the following as recounted by Feingold:

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in February 2006 on the National Security Agency warrantless wiretapping program, Senator Leahy asked Attorney General Alberto Gonzales whether the executive branch was relying in other contexts on the theory that the Authorization for the Use of Military Force gave it the authority to violate the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and other statutes. Specifically, Senator Leahy asked: "Did it [the Executive Branch] authorize the opening of first-class mail of U.S. citizens?" The Attorney General attempted to avoid answering the question, but ultimately stated: "Senator, I think that, again, that is not what is going on here. We are only focused on communications, international communications, where one party to the communication is al Qaeda. That is what this program is all about."

If talking about going to Busch Gardens on a picnic is enough to justify turning Jose Padilla into furniture, Abu Gonzo deserves to go to prison for perjuring himself.

< comment claim report | Feeding the Ravening Tempest (of Iraq) >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    I have to agree with your conclusion (none / 0) (#1)
    by Edger on Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 09:37:32 AM EST
    here scribe, but with one small change.

    Abu Gonzo certainly deserves to go to prison allright.

    For just being himself.

    His entire career as AG has been a crime-in-progress.

    thing is (5.00 / 2) (#2)
    by scribe on Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 10:13:53 AM EST
    if this were a Democratic administration, the howling hell-hounds of the right (led by worthies such as, for example, Barbara Comstock and Mark Corallo, but it's a big barrel-full to pick from) would be making the rounds of all the TV shows:
    (a) demanding immediate investigation, indictment, resignation and replacement;
    (b) sobbing over the "lack of honor" and "dishonoring the high office" inherent* in the allegedly perjured testimony;
    (c) opining that It Will Be The End Of Civilization As We Or Anyone Else Know It Because The Kids Will Take Away A Bad Example From These Dishonest Administration Official(s);  and
    (d) More.

    Of course, how do we deal with teaching our kids that, uh, mass murder, torture, kidnapping, and starting aggressive wars for fun and profit are bad things, when they have a President getting away with all of them?  Just bend over and shut up?

    -

    * You do remember how many otherwise-sane people of Republican prediliction nearly wept - or actually did - over the assertion that one or another Clinton administration official (and I'm not even referring to Bill or Hillary here)  may have been a little less than absolutely, forthrightly, self- and office-abnegatingly open to their inquisitors asking bullsh*t trick 'em "when did you stop beating your wife" questions.  At a Christmas party during those benighted times, an older man - a dentist and father of a friend - stood before me literally sobbing over The Dishonor Janet Reno's Something Or Other had brought on the Republic.

    Parent

    I still think John Dean has (none / 0) (#3)
    by Edger on Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 10:28:30 AM EST
    the best idea, and one that could take care of Abu Gonzo, and also maybe help Leahys' problems with Justice, as well as root out a few other vermin infestations.

    Here is Dean talking with Keith Olbermann about the possibility of a Democratic Congress moving to impeach members of President Bush's Cabinet as an alternative to actually impeaching the President or Vice President:

    Dean: "Keith, I think we're in for two years of struggle to get information, the likes of which we haven't seen since Nixon was in the White House. I think this administration is going to try to build a stone wall that is going to make the [Great] Wall of China look like a stepping stone. They're going to really build a fortress to protect themselves. Cheney has determined this is the whole way to determine the strength of a presidency is by their ability to keep their secrets, and so they're going to go to the mat on this. And I think we'll, impeachment is one way you can do it. But, of course, even Nixon himself refused to cooperate with the impeachment committee, and he would have been impeached, one of the articles, the third article, was to impeach him for failure to cooperate with the impeachment committee. So that isn't the solution either."

    LINK



    Parent