home

Reaction to D.C. Appeals Court Gitmo Decision

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers today issued this press release on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision denying habeas rights to Guantanamo detainees:

The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is extremely disappointed in the decision in which a divided panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that none of the prisoners at Guantanamo Naval Base have any right to challenge their indefinite imprisonment in federal court. The court ruled, in effect, that the United States can imprison people virtually forever without judicial review.

These prisoners were captured by the United States, are confined in prisons built by the United States, are guarded by members of the United States Armed Forces, are subjected to interrogation by the United States intelligence services, and may be imprisoned for the rest of their lives, yet they cannot even petition a court for a writ of habeas corpus for determination whether their imprisonment was the result of a mistake.

Dissenting, Judge Judith W. Rogers reminded the majority that the United States Supreme Court has already stated that “[a]pplication of the habeas statute to persons detained at the [Guantanamo] base is consistent with the historical reach of the writ of habeas corpus." She further wrote that the D.C. court "offers no compelling analysis to compel the contrary conclusion.” The Constitution’s Suspension Clause, she said, acts as a limitation on the powers of Congress.

"The United States Supreme Court has twice ruled that the writ of habeas corpus extends to the prisoners at Guantanamo Navy Base, yet the lower courts and the Congress refuse to get this message,” said NACDL President Martin S. Pinales. “We hope the case proceeds quickly to the Supreme Court and that the court again will vindicate the
historic and fundamental right to habeas corpus and uphold the right of the imprisoned to seek redress in court. Anything less is unthinkable in a democratic society that prides itself on upholding the rule of law and fidelity to the traditional values on which its legal system is based.”

NACDL also urges Congress quickly to rectify the problem it created last year in the Military Commission Act, which, by denying the Guantanamo detainees and others access to the courts, has regrettably returned us to the dark era predating not only the Geneva Conventions,but the Magna Carta.

< Off Again, Open Thread | Lawsuit Challenges Gov't to 'Stop Making False Statements' About Pot >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    where is everone? (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by avidd constitutionalist on Wed Feb 21, 2007 at 08:41:54 PM EST
    i must have expected more than one comment on this entry.  is everone in mass, or glued to whatever is on tonight, or just not interested?

    this ruling chills my blood.  after the revelations of the sneak repeal of posse comitatus and the midnight judicial appointment coup and the warrentless wiretaps and the presidential signing statements, i cannot but believe that our liberty is under assalt by leaders in all branches of our government.  

    many people believe that as americans we're too smart or too manifestly destined to fall for fascism.  but when i think of the enormous power of the religious right and the corporations, and of the suspension of our rights in time of manufactured war,  i cannot help but wonder if pre-fascist italians and germans believed those fantasies too.  

    it is encumbent upon our generation to reiterate our forebears' statement of truth,  to reaffirm that our rights are inborn and cannot be rescinded or removed.  we must demonstrate that we will die before being subject to tyranical rule, and that we will kill, if forced, too.

    the longer we let these fascists rule, the more damage they will sow, and the more violent their overthrow.  if we wait too long to do our duty, we risk permanent harm to our union.  

    (taps)  is this thing on?


    more on it (none / 0) (#5)
    by Edger on Wed Feb 21, 2007 at 08:59:53 PM EST
    US justice (none / 0) (#1)
    by Che's Lounge on Wed Feb 21, 2007 at 05:00:35 PM EST
    The court ruled, in effect, that the United States can imprison people virtually forever without judicial review.

    Not just furriners either. They mean ANYONE.

    Stalin would have been pleased.

    Anyone... (none / 0) (#2)
    by Edger on Wed Feb 21, 2007 at 08:41:13 PM EST
    ...but only if they're "terrists". And if they are "terrists", why would anyone want to bother with judicial review, anyway? Hmmmm? They would never do this to rednecked... sorry, I mean redblooded... patriots. Would they?

    Streamlining. It's the wave of the future.

    Parent

    When I see decisions like this one (none / 0) (#4)
    by kindness on Wed Feb 21, 2007 at 08:58:51 PM EST
    I really have to think that the two Justices who voted to allow this, didn't look at the legal merits nor the historical perspective at all.

    And since both Justices were appointed by Ronnie Raygun & GB41, I am inclined to assume they think their job is to play politics with a nations laws and morality.

    I only wish I had more confidence that when the SCOTUS hears the appeal, they will kick this law to the curb as plainly unconstitutional.  I mean, I think they will do that, but I'm not confident enough.  Another 5-4 decision probably.